It's pretty reasonable to assume it's for undergrad, as grad students can talk to professors rather then DCUM.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That's at the graduate level, though. I don't see any evidence of their undergraduate program being particularly rigorous.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Take NyU off and add some ivies and uchicago
Really? Ever hear of Courant? NYU is very good at math.
Who said this is just about undergrad? Why do you make the rules?
And how do you determine if an undergrad program is rigorous? One of the smartest mathematicians I have ever met went to a completely random school for undergrad, mainly for financial reasons. They were highly motivated and did the work to get into an elite PhD program and went from there.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Although I'm not a particular fan of this site, it may offer you some ideas:
https://www.collegetransitions.com/blog/best-colleges-for-mathematics/
As a suggestion on LACs, if you have an interest in applied math, consider those with an available major in data science.
Applied math isn't data science. Statistics isn't data science either. They're different fields.
This is what the University of Washington, for example, says about its data science track:
"The Data Science option in Applied Mathematics provides students with training in data science methods and practices through the study of statistical modeling, machine learning, artificial intelligence, and optimization, among other aspects of applied mathematics. "
Note that the term applied mathematics appears twice.
It's all 'applied' mathematics obviously. Historically, universities didn't quite know where to put the AI/ML/Statistical learning. Some put them with stats, CS, or math. Ultimately unless you're gunning for a PhD these days 'Data Scientist' to future employers means 'scripting things in Python' or 'building a dashboard'.
Anonymous wrote:NYU
Johns Hopkins
Rice
Harvey Mudd
UMich - I heard their Math Honors track is good?
Williams
Swarthmore
CMU
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Although I'm not a particular fan of this site, it may offer you some ideas:
https://www.collegetransitions.com/blog/best-colleges-for-mathematics/
As a suggestion on LACs, if you have an interest in applied math, consider those with an available major in data science.
Applied math isn't data science. Statistics isn't data science either. They're different fields.
This is what the University of Washington, for example, says about its data science track:
"The Data Science option in Applied Mathematics provides students with training in data science methods and practices through the study of statistical modeling, machine learning, artificial intelligence, and optimization, among other aspects of applied mathematics. "
Note that the term applied mathematics appears twice.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Although I'm not a particular fan of this site, it may offer you some ideas:
https://www.collegetransitions.com/blog/best-colleges-for-mathematics/
As a suggestion on LACs, if you have an interest in applied math, consider those with an available major in data science.
Applied math isn't data science. Statistics isn't data science either. They're different fields.
This is what the University of Washington, for example, says about its data science track:
"The Data Science option in Applied Mathematics provides students with training in data science methods and practices through the study of statistical modeling, machine learning, artificial intelligence, and optimization, among other aspects of applied mathematics. "
Note that the term applied mathematics appears twice.
Cool. Different fields.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Although I'm not a particular fan of this site, it may offer you some ideas:
https://www.collegetransitions.com/blog/best-colleges-for-mathematics/
As a suggestion on LACs, if you have an interest in applied math, consider those with an available major in data science.
Applied math isn't data science. Statistics isn't data science either. They're different fields.
This is what the University of Washington, for example, says about its data science track:
"The Data Science option in Applied Mathematics provides students with training in data science methods and practices through the study of statistical modeling, machine learning, artificial intelligence, and optimization, among other aspects of applied mathematics. "
Note that the term applied mathematics appears twice.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Although I'm not a particular fan of this site, it may offer you some ideas:
https://www.collegetransitions.com/blog/best-colleges-for-mathematics/
As a suggestion on LACs, if you have an interest in applied math, consider those with an available major in data science.
Applied math isn't data science. Statistics isn't data science either. They're different fields.
Anonymous wrote:Although I'm not a particular fan of this site, it may offer you some ideas:
https://www.collegetransitions.com/blog/best-colleges-for-mathematics/
As a suggestion on LACs, if you have an interest in applied math, consider those with an available major in data science.
Anonymous wrote:NYU
Johns Hopkins
Rice
Harvey Mudd
UMich - I heard their Math Honors track is good?
Williams
Swarthmore
CMU
Silly thread. Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That's at the graduate level, though. I don't see any evidence of their undergraduate program being particularly rigorous.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Take NyU off and add some ivies and uchicago
Really? Ever hear of Courant? NYU is very good at math.
Who said this is just about undergrad? Why do you make the rules?
And how do you determine if an undergrad program is rigorous? One of the smartest mathematicians I have ever met went to a completely random school for undergrad, mainly for financial reasons. They were highly motivated and did the work to get into an elite PhD program and went from there.
So we should just conclude that every college has a good math program since there’s always going to be an incredibly intelligent student who can make it work? What a useless comment.
I'm saying that it is very hard to differentiate between these schools at such a granular level and most people who are capable of doing so are likely doing better things with their lives than posting here. And that most people doing so might be doing it based on one or two data points, so I am pre-emptively shooting all of that down by providing a contrarian data point.
There are a handful of kids in America for whom the nuanced differences between different math departments truly matter. These kids are off the charts. You know them when you meet them (and you probably haven't met them). Skippy or Sanjay or Hong taking Calculus at TJ or Stuy as a freshman or sophomore does not qualify him in this group.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That's at the graduate level, though. I don't see any evidence of their undergraduate program being particularly rigorous.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Take NyU off and add some ivies and uchicago
Really? Ever hear of Courant? NYU is very good at math.
Who said this is just about undergrad? Why do you make the rules?
And how do you determine if an undergrad program is rigorous? One of the smartest mathematicians I have ever met went to a completely random school for undergrad, mainly for financial reasons. They were highly motivated and did the work to get into an elite PhD program and went from there.
So we should just conclude that every college has a good math program since there’s always going to be an incredibly intelligent student who can make it work? What a useless comment.
I'm saying that it is very hard to differentiate between these schools at such a granular level and most people who are capable of doing so are likely doing better things with their lives than posting here. And that most people doing so might be doing it based on one or two data points, so I am pre-emptively shooting all of that down by providing a contrarian data point.
There are a handful of kids in America for whom the nuanced differences between different math departments truly matter. These kids are off the charts. You know them when you meet them (and you probably haven't met them). Skippy or Sanjay or Hong taking Calculus at TJ or Stuy as a freshman or sophomore does not qualify him in this group.