+1 The scores go done sometimes over the year which makes it look like the kid is at a negative learning loss since the summer. No one can explain this to the parents. It makes the teachers look bad. So, they hoard the test results for months and months. When they finally post it there is another test result allegedly coming so they tell the parents not to worry and to wait for the next result. The test is flawed. The process is flawed. It was a huge flop and waste of money. This company made out big time while our kids suffered taking the same exact reading passages again and again.Anonymous wrote:The vibe I get from my kid's school is they want to use the scores internally. They do NOT want to have to deal with parents questioning why their kids bombed it, excelled at it, or had scores that are wildly different from the last time they took it. Honestly, I understand that perspective. But it's also frustrating to feel locked out from results or dismissed when you bring scores up. I wish they would just drop the test.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Speaking of un-timely results . . . has anyone see their kids scores from the spring iReady test? It's the last day of elementary school, so I guess parents won't have the opportunity to raise any concerns at this point.
No, but my kid just took it last week. I think the testing window ended last Friday.
Wow! I think my kid took it in March.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Speaking of un-timely results . . . has anyone see their kids scores from the spring iReady test? It's the last day of elementary school, so I guess parents won't have the opportunity to raise any concerns at this point.
No, but my kid just took it last week. I think the testing window ended last Friday.
Anonymous wrote:Speaking of un-timely results . . . has anyone see their kids scores from the spring iReady test? It's the last day of elementary school, so I guess parents won't have the opportunity to raise any concerns at this point.
Anonymous wrote:+1 Kids would all joke about the same poems and passsges time after time. They wouldn’t even re-read the passages because they felt that they recalled it from 3 months ago.Anonymous wrote:I’m ready to get rid of iReady. What a waste of resources! The teachers hated it. The students hated it. And the parents didn’t get the results timely nor ever know what was being done about the results. Sometimes the score would go down from September to January. Kids made fun of the software and how it used the same reading passages every time. Its adaptive capability had flaws. If a student confused rows and columns in a matrix, it would bottom out at that grade. It was just majorly flawed.
Anonymous wrote:Speaking of un-timely results . . . has anyone see their kids scores from the spring iReady test? It's the last day of elementary school, so I guess parents won't have the opportunity to raise any concerns at this point.
+1 Kids would all joke about the same poems and passsges time after time. They wouldn’t even re-read the passages because they felt that they recalled it from 3 months ago.Anonymous wrote:I’m ready to get rid of iReady. What a waste of resources! The teachers hated it. The students hated it. And the parents didn’t get the results timely nor ever know what was being done about the results. Sometimes the score would go down from September to January. Kids made fun of the software and how it used the same reading passages every time. Its adaptive capability had flaws. If a student confused rows and columns in a matrix, it would bottom out at that grade. It was just majorly flawed.
Anonymous wrote:It seems to be a good test for identifying kids who are really having problems/at risk, but at my kid’s school they take it 3x a year in K-2, 2x a year at least in 3rd and 4th (the spring iready seems to be supplanted by the SOL’s by that point), and each test takes a large chunk of the day and is “like 100 questions” according to my kid. It seems like there’s a better use of class time for many kids.