Anonymous
05/16/2025 07:29
Subject: Georgia's anti-abortion law forcing brain-dead woman to remain on life support
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Another horrific consequence of abortion bans. Plus this poor fetus will not likely survive. This is truly disgusting.
https://apnews.com/article/pregnant-woman-brain-dead-abortion-ban-georgia-a85a5906e5b2c4889525f2300c441745
This isn’t about abortion, it is about activist healthcare professionals abusing this poor woman’s body to make a political statement.
And it is gross.
Smith’s family says Emory doctors have told them they are not allowed to stop or remove the devices that are keeping her breathing because state law bans abortion after cardiac activity can be detected — generally around six weeks into pregnancy.
There is no law saying they have to keep this woman’s body alive. This is awful, unethical and public use of women’s bodies to make political points.
Uh no, healthcare professionals do not do this. JFC you are insane.
To think that healthcare professionals are incapable of activism is being naive.
We have seen the same activists healthcare providers maim children to “affirm” gender.
Healthcare providers have been part of eugenics.
This woman’s body is being used as a public display of activism to say: See what you made us do!
Absolute effing BS. I am an RN. The hospital is sustaining the patient for the fetus because their lawyers are telling them to. Because of the way the law is written, they are legally tied at the moment. Typically there might be a team ethics consult but because it is a legal matter, the law trumps even the ethics consult.
That you think ab entire team of doctors and nurses (who likely change daily if not weekly), nursing managers, hospital administrators, social workers, and more, are all collaboratively scheming to keep her alive (at hospital expense, taking up a needed bed) as a form of activism or to make a statement, is tin foil hat level absurd.
Identify the law that requires a woman's body to be maintained in a state of artificial or mechanical life after brain death to prevent the entire system from failing to protect a pregnancy.
There isn’t one. They aren’t performing an abortion by pulling the plug.
They are proving a point by using this woman’s body.
They are following the law and protecting an unborn baby- why do you not support that? The baby will be a gift to the grieving family.
I’m sure a go fund me will take care of the hospital bills.
The baby if it survives will be born gravely disabled. Who is going to pay for a lifetime of support?
Anonymous
05/16/2025 07:28
Subject: Georgia's anti-abortion law forcing brain-dead woman to remain on life support
Anonymous wrote:It is apprently impossible for MAGA to wrap their heads around the fact that these laws have had crippling and detrimental effects on women's healthcare. No matter what comes out of Texas (women dying of sepsis--must be medical activism!) or Georgia or any other states, they will continue to deny deny deny.
Exactly. This is the world you all wanted to live in, and now that it's here, it's "medical activism." We warned you repeatedly, that abortion is healthcare and playing with access to it would result in more women and babies dying. But you wanted this. You all did this, now own it.
She was 9 weeks pregnant. 9 weeks. Her corpse has been used as an incubator for longer than she had been pregnant.
I keep waffling over whether or not to have a baby of my own, and I see stuff like this, and I'm brought back to reality. If I choose to become pregnant in this country, my life ceases to matter. My rights cease to exist. I will not be having children for this reason, and I know I'm not alone in this choice.
Anonymous
05/16/2025 07:04
Subject: Georgia's anti-abortion law forcing brain-dead woman to remain on life support
It is apprently impossible for MAGA to wrap their heads around the fact that these laws have had crippling and detrimental effects on women's healthcare. No matter what comes out of Texas (women dying of sepsis--must be medical activism!) or Georgia or any other states, they will continue to deny deny deny.
Anonymous
05/16/2025 06:52
Subject: Georgia's anti-abortion law forcing brain-dead woman to remain on life support
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Another horrific consequence of abortion bans. Plus this poor fetus will not likely survive. This is truly disgusting.
https://apnews.com/article/pregnant-woman-brain-dead-abortion-ban-georgia-a85a5906e5b2c4889525f2300c441745
This isn’t about abortion, it is about activist healthcare professionals abusing this poor woman’s body to make a political statement.
And it is gross.
Smith’s family says Emory doctors have told them they are not allowed to stop or remove the devices that are keeping her breathing because state law bans abortion after cardiac activity can be detected — generally around six weeks into pregnancy.
There is no law saying they have to keep this woman’s body alive. This is awful, unethical and public use of women’s bodies to make political points.
Uh no, healthcare professionals do not do this. JFC you are insane.
To think that healthcare professionals are incapable of activism is being naive.
We have seen the same activists healthcare providers maim children to “affirm” gender.
Healthcare providers have been part of eugenics.
This woman’s body is being used as a public display of activism to say: See what you made us do!
Absolute effing BS. I am an RN. The hospital is sustaining the patient for the fetus because their lawyers are telling them to. Because of the way the law is written, they are legally tied at the moment. Typically there might be a team ethics consult but because it is a legal matter, the law trumps even the ethics consult.
That you think ab entire team of doctors and nurses (who likely change daily if not weekly), nursing managers, hospital administrators, social workers, and more, are all collaboratively scheming to keep her alive (at hospital expense, taking up a needed bed) as a form of activism or to make a statement, is tin foil hat level absurd.
Identify the law that requires a woman's body to be maintained in a state of artificial or mechanical life after brain death to prevent the entire system from failing to protect a pregnancy.
There isn’t one. They aren’t performing an abortion by pulling the plug.
They are proving a point by using this woman’s body.
They are following the law and protecting an unborn baby- why do you not support that? The baby will be a gift to the grieving family.
I’m sure a go fund me will take care of the hospital bills.
The grieving family already lost their daughter when she was declared brain dead 3 months ago at 9 weeks pregnant. They wanted her removed from life support. The state of Georgia has decided this women must be kept alive at all costs as an incubator until the fetus is viable at which time they will slice her open to deliver the infant then the family can remove her from life support so she can finally rest in peace. The fetus has fluid on its brain and is hardly a gift to the grieving family. You are disgusting.
Anonymous
05/16/2025 05:49
Subject: Georgia's anti-abortion law forcing brain-dead woman to remain on life support
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Another horrific consequence of abortion bans. Plus this poor fetus will not likely survive. This is truly disgusting.
https://apnews.com/article/pregnant-woman-brain-dead-abortion-ban-georgia-a85a5906e5b2c4889525f2300c441745
This isn’t about abortion, it is about activist healthcare professionals abusing this poor woman’s body to make a political statement.
And it is gross.
Smith’s family says Emory doctors have told them they are not allowed to stop or remove the devices that are keeping her breathing because state law bans abortion after cardiac activity can be detected — generally around six weeks into pregnancy.
There is no law saying they have to keep this woman’s body alive. This is awful, unethical and public use of women’s bodies to make political points.
Uh no, healthcare professionals do not do this. JFC you are insane.
To think that healthcare professionals are incapable of activism is being naive.
We have seen the same activists healthcare providers maim children to “affirm” gender.
Healthcare providers have been part of eugenics.
This woman’s body is being used as a public display of activism to say: See what you made us do!
Absolute effing BS. I am an RN. The hospital is sustaining the patient for the fetus because their lawyers are telling them to. Because of the way the law is written, they are legally tied at the moment. Typically there might be a team ethics consult but because it is a legal matter, the law trumps even the ethics consult.
That you think ab entire team of doctors and nurses (who likely change daily if not weekly), nursing managers, hospital administrators, social workers, and more, are all collaboratively scheming to keep her alive (at hospital expense, taking up a needed bed) as a form of activism or to make a statement, is tin foil hat level absurd.
Identify the law that requires a woman's body to be maintained in a state of artificial or mechanical life after brain death to prevent the entire system from failing to protect a pregnancy.
There isn’t one. They aren’t performing an abortion by pulling the plug.
They are proving a point by using this woman’s body.
They are following the law and protecting an unborn baby- why do you not support that? The baby will be a gift to the grieving family.
I’m sure a go fund me will take care of the hospital bills.
Anonymous
05/16/2025 03:29
Subject: Georgia's anti-abortion law forcing brain-dead woman to remain on life support
Georgia gives personhood to the fetus legally. This likely means the hospital must separately consider the fetus' health before removing the mother from the ventilator. While the mother is "braindead" if the fetus is otherwise healthy, cannot be removed.
Anonymous
05/16/2025 01:42
Subject: Re:Georgia's anti-abortion law forcing brain-dead woman to remain on life support
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Here's the text of Georgia's law:
“‘Abortion’ means the act of using, prescribing, or administering any instrument, substance, device, or other means with the purpose to terminate a pregnancy with
knowledge that termination will, with reasonable likelihood, cause the death of an unborn child.”
I suppose you could argue that the doctors aren't removing life support *in order to* terminate the pregnancy, but they certainly wouldn't be doing it for the benefit of the mother, right? She's dead. And they certainly have knowledge that removing life support ("any other means") will be reasonably likely to cause the death of an unborn child.
For SURE there is someone out there, some right to lifer, willing to sue the doctor who removes life support. So since the law doesn't specifically say they can do this - they can't do it.
They are not terminating a pregnancy. They are allowing the body of the woman to die naturally.
This is 100% activism on the medical professional level.
Only if by activism, you mean refusing to puttheir medical license, and freedom, on the line by taking an action that will end a pregnancy without ironclad guarantee that their actions will be protected from criminal prosecution, I guess you are right.
It used to be that abortions were legal, and doctors therefore had the freedom to make medical decisions in the best interest of their patients.
Now in Georgia they are not legal unless the meet certain strict guidelines. brain death of mother needs to be one of them.
Anonymous
05/16/2025 01:38
Subject: Georgia's anti-abortion law forcing brain-dead woman to remain on life support
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Another horrific consequence of abortion bans. Plus this poor fetus will not likely survive. This is truly disgusting.
https://apnews.com/article/pregnant-woman-brain-dead-abortion-ban-georgia-a85a5906e5b2c4889525f2300c441745
This isn’t about abortion, it is about activist healthcare professionals abusing this poor woman’s body to make a political statement.
And it is gross.
Smith’s family says Emory doctors have told them they are not allowed to stop or remove the devices that are keeping her breathing because state law bans abortion after cardiac activity can be detected — generally around six weeks into pregnancy.
There is no law saying they have to keep this woman’s body alive. This is awful, unethical and public use of women’s bodies to make political points.
Uh no, healthcare professionals do not do this. JFC you are insane.
To think that healthcare professionals are incapable of activism is being naive.
We have seen the same activists healthcare providers maim children to “affirm” gender.
Healthcare providers have been part of eugenics.
This woman’s body is being used as a public display of activism to say: See what you made us do!
Absolute effing BS. I am an RN. The hospital is sustaining the patient for the fetus because their lawyers are telling them to. Because of the way the law is written, they are legally tied at the moment. Typically there might be a team ethics consult but because it is a legal matter, the law trumps even the ethics consult.
That you think ab entire team of doctors and nurses (who likely change daily if not weekly), nursing managers, hospital administrators, social workers, and more, are all collaboratively scheming to keep her alive (at hospital expense, taking up a needed bed) as a form of activism or to make a statement, is tin foil hat level absurd.
Identify the law that requires a woman's body to be maintained in a state of artificial or mechanical life after brain death to prevent the entire system from failing to protect a pregnancy.
There isn’t one. They aren’t performing an abortion by pulling the plug.
They are proving a point by using this woman’s body.
That's a subjective statement, though, and open to interpretation by the courts.
They are definitely ending a pregnancy by pulling the plug.
The law says a procedure is illegal if its purpose is to end a pregnancy.
Now the court case is going to hinge on, "what was in your mind when you decided to end life support? Were you intending to end a pregnancy?"
Even if you state that these doctors will be in no legal danger, you can't promise that.
Anonymous
05/15/2025 23:20
Subject: Georgia's anti-abortion law forcing brain-dead woman to remain on life support
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Another horrific consequence of abortion bans. Plus this poor fetus will not likely survive. This is truly disgusting.
https://apnews.com/article/pregnant-woman-brain-dead-abortion-ban-georgia-a85a5906e5b2c4889525f2300c441745
This isn’t about abortion, it is about activist healthcare professionals abusing this poor woman’s body to make a political statement.
And it is gross.
Smith’s family says Emory doctors have told them they are not allowed to stop or remove the devices that are keeping her breathing because state law bans abortion after cardiac activity can be detected — generally around six weeks into pregnancy.
There is no law saying they have to keep this woman’s body alive. This is awful, unethical and public use of women’s bodies to make political points.
Uh no, healthcare professionals do not do this. JFC you are insane.
To think that healthcare professionals are incapable of activism is being naive.
We have seen the same activists healthcare providers maim children to “affirm” gender.
Healthcare providers have been part of eugenics.
This woman’s body is being used as a public display of activism to say: See what you made us do!
Absolute effing BS. I am an RN. The hospital is sustaining the patient for the fetus because their lawyers are telling them to. Because of the way the law is written, they are legally tied at the moment. Typically there might be a team ethics consult but because it is a legal matter, the law trumps even the ethics consult.
That you think ab entire team of doctors and nurses (who likely change daily if not weekly), nursing managers, hospital administrators, social workers, and more, are all collaboratively scheming to keep her alive (at hospital expense, taking up a needed bed) as a form of activism or to make a statement, is tin foil hat level absurd.
Identify the law that requires a woman's body to be maintained in a state of artificial or mechanical life after brain death to prevent the entire system from failing to protect a pregnancy.
There isn’t one. They aren’t performing an abortion by pulling the plug.
They are proving a point by using this woman’s body.
The bolded is exactly the point that keeps going over your head. The laws do not define every possible circumstance and what’s acceptable treatment under the law. Politicians with no medical background issued vague and partial guidelines and will enforce them by their own interpretation too.
Anonymous
05/15/2025 23:16
Subject: Georgia's anti-abortion law forcing brain-dead woman to remain on life support
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Another horrific consequence of abortion bans. Plus this poor fetus will not likely survive. This is truly disgusting.
https://apnews.com/article/pregnant-woman-brain-dead-abortion-ban-georgia-a85a5906e5b2c4889525f2300c441745
This isn’t about abortion, it is about activist healthcare professionals abusing this poor woman’s body to make a political statement.
And it is gross.
Smith’s family says Emory doctors have told them they are not allowed to stop or remove the devices that are keeping her breathing because state law bans abortion after cardiac activity can be detected — generally around six weeks into pregnancy.
There is no law saying they have to keep this woman’s body alive. This is awful, unethical and public use of women’s bodies to make political points.
Uh no, healthcare professionals do not do this. JFC you are insane.
To think that healthcare professionals are incapable of activism is being naive.
We have seen the same activists healthcare providers maim children to “affirm” gender.
Healthcare providers have been part of eugenics.
This woman’s body is being used as a public display of activism to say: See what you made us do!
Absolute effing BS. I am an RN. The hospital is sustaining the patient for the fetus because their lawyers are telling them to. Because of the way the law is written, they are legally tied at the moment. Typically there might be a team ethics consult but because it is a legal matter, the law trumps even the ethics consult.
That you think ab entire team of doctors and nurses (who likely change daily if not weekly), nursing managers, hospital administrators, social workers, and more, are all collaboratively scheming to keep her alive (at hospital expense, taking up a needed bed) as a form of activism or to make a statement, is tin foil hat level absurd.
Identify the law that requires a woman's body to be maintained in a state of artificial or mechanical life after brain death to prevent the entire system from failing to protect a pregnancy.
There isn’t one. They aren’t performing an abortion by pulling the plug.
They are proving a point by using this woman’s body.
You are missing the real and serious issue in favor of a bizarre fantasy about professionals.
Are you trolling?
Anonymous
05/15/2025 22:15
Subject: Georgia's anti-abortion law forcing brain-dead woman to remain on life support
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Another horrific consequence of abortion bans. Plus this poor fetus will not likely survive. This is truly disgusting.
https://apnews.com/article/pregnant-woman-brain-dead-abortion-ban-georgia-a85a5906e5b2c4889525f2300c441745
This isn’t about abortion, it is about activist healthcare professionals abusing this poor woman’s body to make a political statement.
And it is gross.
Smith’s family says Emory doctors have told them they are not allowed to stop or remove the devices that are keeping her breathing because state law bans abortion after cardiac activity can be detected — generally around six weeks into pregnancy.
There is no law saying they have to keep this woman’s body alive. This is awful, unethical and public use of women’s bodies to make political points.
Uh no, healthcare professionals do not do this. JFC you are insane.
To think that healthcare professionals are incapable of activism is being naive.
We have seen the same activists healthcare providers maim children to “affirm” gender.
Healthcare providers have been part of eugenics.
This woman’s body is being used as a public display of activism to say: See what you made us do!
Absolute effing BS. I am an RN. The hospital is sustaining the patient for the fetus because their lawyers are telling them to. Because of the way the law is written, they are legally tied at the moment. Typically there might be a team ethics consult but because it is a legal matter, the law trumps even the ethics consult.
That you think ab entire team of doctors and nurses (who likely change daily if not weekly), nursing managers, hospital administrators, social workers, and more, are all collaboratively scheming to keep her alive (at hospital expense, taking up a needed bed) as a form of activism or to make a statement, is tin foil hat level absurd.
Identify the law that requires a woman's body to be maintained in a state of artificial or mechanical life after brain death to prevent the entire system from failing to protect a pregnancy.
There isn’t one. They aren’t performing an abortion by pulling the plug.
They are proving a point by using this woman’s body.
Stick a fork in your tin foil hat. "They" including a massive amount of people who change by the day. It is a hospital following their legal input to protect themselves and staff from legal action from their local pro life nut jobs.
Anonymous
05/15/2025 22:12
Subject: Georgia's anti-abortion law forcing brain-dead woman to remain on life support
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Another horrific consequence of abortion bans. Plus this poor fetus will not likely survive. This is truly disgusting.
https://apnews.com/article/pregnant-woman-brain-dead-abortion-ban-georgia-a85a5906e5b2c4889525f2300c441745
This isn’t about abortion, it is about activist healthcare professionals abusing this poor woman’s body to make a political statement.
And it is gross.
Smith’s family says Emory doctors have told them they are not allowed to stop or remove the devices that are keeping her breathing because state law bans abortion after cardiac activity can be detected — generally around six weeks into pregnancy.
There is no law saying they have to keep this woman’s body alive. This is awful, unethical and public use of women’s bodies to make political points.
Uh no, healthcare professionals do not do this. JFC you are insane.
To think that healthcare professionals are incapable of activism is being naive.
We have seen the same activists healthcare providers maim children to “affirm” gender.
Healthcare providers have been part of eugenics.
This woman’s body is being used as a public display of activism to say: See what you made us do!
Absolute effing BS. I am an RN. The hospital is sustaining the patient for the fetus because their lawyers are telling them to. Because of the way the law is written, they are legally tied at the moment. Typically there might be a team ethics consult but because it is a legal matter, the law trumps even the ethics consult.
That you think ab entire team of doctors and nurses (who likely change daily if not weekly), nursing managers, hospital administrators, social workers, and more, are all collaboratively scheming to keep her alive (at hospital expense, taking up a needed bed) as a form of activism or to make a statement, is tin foil hat level absurd.
Identify the law that requires a woman's body to be maintained in a state of artificial or mechanical life after brain death to prevent the entire system from failing to protect a pregnancy.
There isn’t one. They aren’t performing an abortion by pulling the plug.
They are proving a point by using this woman’s body.
Anonymous
05/15/2025 22:10
Subject: Georgia's anti-abortion law forcing brain-dead woman to remain on life support
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Another horrific consequence of abortion bans. Plus this poor fetus will not likely survive. This is truly disgusting.
https://apnews.com/article/pregnant-woman-brain-dead-abortion-ban-georgia-a85a5906e5b2c4889525f2300c441745
This isn’t about abortion, it is about activist healthcare professionals abusing this poor woman’s body to make a political statement.
And it is gross.
Smith’s family says Emory doctors have told them they are not allowed to stop or remove the devices that are keeping her breathing because state law bans abortion after cardiac activity can be detected — generally around six weeks into pregnancy.
There is no law saying they have to keep this woman’s body alive. This is awful, unethical and public use of women’s bodies to make political points.
This is what happens when doctors fear a politician’s interpretation will end up costing them their license and freedom.
This isn’t fear, it’s activism.
I suppose there are lunatics everywhere, but most people who go to school for 12 years, take on $400,000 worth of debt, and have a license to practice controlled by the state are not going to risk losing their license and career over “activism”. Their hands are tied by stupid politicians and lawyers.
Anonymous
05/15/2025 22:10
Subject: Re:Georgia's anti-abortion law forcing brain-dead woman to remain on life support
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Here's the text of Georgia's law:
“‘Abortion’ means the act of using, prescribing, or administering any instrument, substance, device, or other means with the purpose to terminate a pregnancy with
knowledge that termination will, with reasonable likelihood, cause the death of an unborn child.”
I suppose you could argue that the doctors aren't removing life support *in order to* terminate the pregnancy, but they certainly wouldn't be doing it for the benefit of the mother, right? She's dead. And they certainly have knowledge that removing life support ("any other means") will be reasonably likely to cause the death of an unborn child.
For SURE there is someone out there, some right to lifer, willing to sue the doctor who removes life support. So since the law doesn't specifically say they can do this - they can't do it.
They are not terminating a pregnancy. They are allowing the body of the woman to die naturally.
This is 100% activism on the medical professional level.
No, it isn't. You are delusional. A large team of hospital administrators, nurses, doctors, social workers, and more, are not conspiring. It is the hospital following the input of their legal team, that is it.
You are a tin foil hat conspiracy nut job.
Anonymous
05/15/2025 22:03
Subject: Re:Georgia's anti-abortion law forcing brain-dead woman to remain on life support
Anonymous wrote:Here's the text of Georgia's law:
“‘Abortion’ means the act of using, prescribing, or administering any instrument, substance, device, or other means with the purpose to terminate a pregnancy with
knowledge that termination will, with reasonable likelihood, cause the death of an unborn child.”
I suppose you could argue that the doctors aren't removing life support *in order to* terminate the pregnancy, but they certainly wouldn't be doing it for the benefit of the mother, right? She's dead. And they certainly have knowledge that removing life support ("any other means") will be reasonably likely to cause the death of an unborn child.
For SURE there is someone out there, some right to lifer, willing to sue the doctor who removes life support. So since the law doesn't specifically say they can do this - they can't do it.
They are not terminating a pregnancy. They are allowing the body of the woman to die naturally.
This is 100% activism on the medical professional level.