Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If only 2 out of 100 applicants has what you are expecting for the level job you are advertising, perhaps the problem is your requirements.
Are you one of those companies that requires 2 years experience for an unpaid entry level internship too?
No, we have a very specialized piece of technology that requires experience as its a senior level role not entry level. We have paid internships and they require that you are in the last 2 years of your college and a related degree .
Anonymous wrote:I have the same issue as OP. 99% of the resumes I get are junk and completely unrelated to my field. The big problem is that my field doesn't have a college major associated with it and it's more skill based. There's a burnout factor at my job and a lot of the hires will never gain the skills needed. Pay is great. Our job is more research and critically analyzing. I've hired so many people who were extremely slow readers, unable to critically analyze things, poor writers, or just very slow workers (none of those things can be trained). I have asked for writing samples, but those can be fudged. I ask detailed questions in interviews to see how well people can think on their feet, but that weeds out people like me. I'm shy and bad at interviewing. I can think and write very quickly, but I cannot often say it out loud. The best thing I can do is hire persons who have done this job before and are looking for a promotion.
Skills can be learned on the job- yes but not at the salary I'm hiring at. Those people need a lot lower salary.
Anonymous wrote:we are using both that's why most get filtered. I want to start flagging all these people and recording them down for fraud or something. Why would you hire people who lie about their background?Anonymous wrote:USE AI or ATS
Anonymous wrote:I have the same issue as OP. 99% of the resumes I get are junk and completely unrelated to my field. The big problem is that my field doesn't have a college major associated with it and it's more skill based. There's a burnout factor at my job and a lot of the hires will never gain the skills needed. Pay is great. Our job is more research and critically analyzing. I've hired so many people who were extremely slow readers, unable to critically analyze things, poor writers, or just very slow workers (none of those things can be trained). I have asked for writing samples, but those can be fudged. I ask detailed questions in interviews to see how well people can think on their feet, but that weeds out people like me. I'm shy and bad at interviewing. I can think and write very quickly, but I cannot often say it out loud. The best thing I can do is hire persons who have done this job before and are looking for a promotion.
Skills can be learned on the job- yes but not at the salary I'm hiring at. Those people need a lot lower salary.
Anonymous wrote:If only 2 out of 100 applicants has what you are expecting for the level job you are advertising, perhaps the problem is your requirements.
Are you one of those companies that requires 2 years experience for an unpaid entry level internship too?
we are using both that's why most get filtered. I want to start flagging all these people and recording them down for fraud or something. Why would you hire people who lie about their background?Anonymous wrote:USE AI or ATS