Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think you are missing a piece.
Often the pressure for UMC families to stay in public education comes from middle class families or even UMC families who for whatever reason cannot afford or don't want to go private.
And the reason is not because they want the UMC kids to "share space" with poor kids. It's because middle class families who can't afford private want to have well-resourced peers with educated parents. They don't want to be left alone to struggle through a public education system where they are the minority and where the entire system pretty much has to focus on the neediest students at the expense of middle class kids who, in that environment, are considered privileged.
Thus educated middle class families where the parents are teachers, government workers, nurses, administrators, etc., don't want the kids of doctors and lawyers to abandon public school for private. They know their kids will greatly benefit from a system where they are still "in the middle" in terms of SES.
I also think that among low income families and the people who are focused on helping low income kids, there's little pressure on UMC families to stay in the system. Instead, I think there is resentment towards these families and a sense of relief when they leave, because if you are focused on the needs of low income families in public education, the interests and demands of UMC families can be seen as a distraction and detraction.
I have seen this dynamic first hand at a Title 1 school that was openly hostile to UMC parents who wanted things common in UMC suburban schools.
By grouping middle and UMC families together (where UMC families *can* afford private, sometimes with some sacrifice, and middle class families cannot) you are missing the truth of the dynamic.
Agree with this entirely. Have experience in the same environment.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm super bummed when people peel off for privates, when I thought their values aligned more with ours in being part of public school and the wider community. Whether they're super wealthy or not. We could afford private (it would be a stretch, but...) trying hard to put my money where my mouth is and keep my kids in public - and invest in public.
Oh please. I know your type. As soon as the balances tip you will pull your kid for private or an affluent public and then be crowing all about how the private is just a “better fit for our family.”
education is about education. Pretending it is some venue to prove your virtue and values does nothing to help anyone, least of all the kids without the privilege to up and move.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That’s a liberal mindset that you have to sacrifice yourself and your children for the benefit of others. Sorry, but I “noped” out of that way of thinking years ago.
I went to public schools all my life and they were wonderful, but I had to send my kids to Catholic school to get a similar education for them.
We still pay taxes so the system gets money for schools we don’t use. That’s enough sacrifice from me.
Is it a liberal mindset though? Wouldn't a true liberal want mixed-income schools (as opposed to very wealthy/very poor schools), more resources for everyone, and the like? I consider myself somewhat progressive and the segregated schools in our district don't align with my values.
I was referring to the notion that parents have an obligation to send their kids to public schools, regardless of the current state of those schools, and should feel shame if they don’t.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That’s a liberal mindset that you have to sacrifice yourself and your children for the benefit of others. Sorry, but I “noped” out of that way of thinking years ago.
I went to public schools all my life and they were wonderful, but I had to send my kids to Catholic school to get a similar education for them.
We still pay taxes so the system gets money for schools we don’t use. That’s enough sacrifice from me.
Is it a liberal mindset though? Wouldn't a true liberal want mixed-income schools (as opposed to very wealthy/very poor schools), more resources for everyone, and the like? I consider myself somewhat progressive and the segregated schools in our district don't align with my values.
I was referring to the notion that parents have an obligation to send their kids to public schools, regardless of the current state of those schools, and should feel shame if they don’t.
I don’t believe anyone other than a very very small group of true believers actually thinks that let alone actually makes decisions based on it. I happen to believe public is better for my particular kid but that’s not because my “values” demand it. I do get annoyed when parents peel off for charters and privates but not so much due to values but because it seemed like they were just chasing the latest trend, especially with charters.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That’s a liberal mindset that you have to sacrifice yourself and your children for the benefit of others. Sorry, but I “noped” out of that way of thinking years ago.
I went to public schools all my life and they were wonderful, but I had to send my kids to Catholic school to get a similar education for them.
We still pay taxes so the system gets money for schools we don’t use. That’s enough sacrifice from me.
Is it a liberal mindset though? Wouldn't a true liberal want mixed-income schools (as opposed to very wealthy/very poor schools), more resources for everyone, and the like? I consider myself somewhat progressive and the segregated schools in our district don't align with my values.
I was referring to the notion that parents have an obligation to send their kids to public schools, regardless of the current state of those schools, and should feel shame if they don’t.
Anonymous wrote:I'm super bummed when people peel off for privates, when I thought their values aligned more with ours in being part of public school and the wider community. Whether they're super wealthy or not. We could afford private (it would be a stretch, but...) trying hard to put my money where my mouth is and keep my kids in public - and invest in public.
Anonymous wrote:I'm super bummed when people peel off for privates, when I thought their values aligned more with ours in being part of public school and the wider community. Whether they're super wealthy or not. We could afford private (it would be a stretch, but...) trying hard to put my money where my mouth is and keep my kids in public - and invest in public.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That’s a liberal mindset that you have to sacrifice yourself and your children for the benefit of others. Sorry, but I “noped” out of that way of thinking years ago.
I went to public schools all my life and they were wonderful, but I had to send my kids to Catholic school to get a similar education for them.
We still pay taxes so the system gets money for schools we don’t use. That’s enough sacrifice from me.
Is it a liberal mindset though? Wouldn't a true liberal want mixed-income schools (as opposed to very wealthy/very poor schools), more resources for everyone, and the like? I consider myself somewhat progressive and the segregated schools in our district don't align with my values.
Anonymous wrote:That’s a liberal mindset that you have to sacrifice yourself and your children for the benefit of others. Sorry, but I “noped” out of that way of thinking years ago.
I went to public schools all my life and they were wonderful, but I had to send my kids to Catholic school to get a similar education for them.
We still pay taxes so the system gets money for schools we don’t use. That’s enough sacrifice from me.
Anonymous wrote:That’s a liberal mindset that you have to sacrifice yourself and your children for the benefit of others. Sorry, but I “noped” out of that way of thinking years ago.
I went to public schools all my life and they were wonderful, but I had to send my kids to Catholic school to get a similar education for them.
We still pay taxes so the system gets money for schools we don’t use. That’s enough sacrifice from me.