President Clinton places the blame squarely on Hindu militants, not
on the so-called Kashmiri Muslims that the Indian government tried to
blame for the massacre. In 2002, the Washington Times reported that the
government finally admitted its responsibility and admitted that the
evidence that it used to pin the blame on Kashmiris was false.
Reporter Barry Bearak of the New York Times also placed the blame
squarely on the Indian government, as did two independent
investigations, one by the International Human Rights Organization,
which is based in Ludhiana, and the other conducted jointly by the
Punjab Human Rights Organization and the Movement Against State
Repression. The evidence is overwhelming, yet Indian sycophants
continue to deny the government's responsibility.
Unfortunately, this massacre would have been swept under the rug if
not for the outstanding efforts of the organizations mentioned above
and of the Council of Khalistan, which has painstakingly documented any
new developments. I am indebted to them for bringing this to my
attention.
The massacre was part of a pattern of repression of minorities that
has brought about the murders of over 250,000 Sikhs, more than 300,000
Christians in Nagaland alone, over 90,000 Muslims in Kashmir alone, and
Christians and Muslims throughout the country, as well as tens of
thousands of Assamese, Bodos, Dalits, Manipuris, Tamils, and other
minorities. This is one reason that it is essential to cut off our aid
and trade to India and to demand a free and fair plebiscite in Punjab,
Khalistan, in Kashmir, in Nagalim, and wherever people are seeking
their freedom. This is the only way to bring freedom, peace, stability,
and dignity to all the people of south Asia.
I would like to introduce the press release from the Council of
Khalistan on Secretary Albright's book into the Record at this time.

Here are the receipts for Bill Clinton’s observations:

https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CRECB-2006-pt8/html/CRECB-2006-pt8-Pg10183.htm

India’s intelligence services planned this. They planned a similar attack during Clinton’s visit. Gives them a pretext for their War machine as America tilts to them for cheap labor/ manufacturing purposes.

Pakistan has been having a lot of financial issues for several years now. They would not engage in these tactics because no moolah.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Am I the only one who thinks this is an appropriate response to the Kashmir attack?

How do you think this is appropriate?

This is crazy. And dangerous.

1) Pakistan has a long history of being a safe haven for terrorists.

2) Slaughtering tourists is not okay.

Killing civilians in a mosque is also not okay.

FAFO

Exactly. I admire India for not rolling over.

Agreed. Pakistan is a haven for terrorists (Bin Laden was found in Pakistan).!

Anonymous wrote:In this thread OP may learn that main stream media is driven by clicks. Until today, there were not enough clicks to be given in response to a story on tensions between these two.

Or OP won’t learn and is still an idiot.

How can people click on the story when the media hadn't even meaningfully been running the story to begin with?

Anonymous wrote:We have seen this movie multiple times, the moment things get to normal in Kashmir, something similar happens. Every time it’s Pakistan playing similar games. This time they got what they have been begging for a long time.

Movie is right.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008_Mumbai_attacks

Anonymous wrote:Yes, I thought it was strange how little reporting the 4/22 attack on Kashmir received in the US. I really only saw it on twitter.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cze10y59j91o.amp

India kicked out all the Pakistanis from the country. That was a huge step, that again, got little coverage.

And I guess the fighting has escalated now? Not good.

Are people surprised Modi is a nationalist?

We have seen this movie multiple times, the moment things get to normal in Kashmir, something similar happens. Every time it’s Pakistan playing similar games. This time they got what they have been begging for a long time.

In this thread OP may learn that main stream media is driven by clicks. Until today, there were not enough clicks to be given in response to a story on tensions between these two.

Or OP won’t learn and is still an idiot.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Am I the only one who thinks this is an appropriate response to the Kashmir attack?

How do you think this is appropriate?

This is crazy. And dangerous.

1) Pakistan has a long history of being a safe haven for terrorists.

2) Slaughtering tourists is not okay.

Killing civilians in a mosque is also not okay.

FAFO

Exactly. I admire India for not rolling over.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Am I the only one who thinks this is an appropriate response to the Kashmir attack?

How do you think this is appropriate?

This is crazy. And dangerous.

1) Pakistan has a long history of being a safe haven for terrorists.

2) Slaughtering tourists is not okay.

Killing civilians in a mosque is also not okay.

FAFO

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Am I the only one who thinks this is an appropriate response to the Kashmir attack?

How do you think this is appropriate?

This is crazy. And dangerous.

So was the Kashmir attack.

The question was not whether the Kashmir attack was ok. It was how is this appropriate?

Unless you think crazy and dangerous attacks are appropriate?

It is an officially declared attack within the non disputed borders of Pakistan by the Indian military.

Countries have a right to self-defense. If nothing was done in response, attacks on India would continue.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Am I the only one who thinks this is an appropriate response to the Kashmir attack?

How do you think this is appropriate?

This is crazy. And dangerous.

1) Pakistan has a long history of being a safe haven for terrorists.

2) Slaughtering tourists is not okay.

Killing civilians in a mosque is also not okay.

A child was killed when one of the Indian missiles struck a mosque.
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/india-fires-missiles-across-the-frontier-with-pakistan

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Am I the only one who thinks this is an appropriate response to the Kashmir attack?

How do you think this is appropriate?

This is crazy. And dangerous.

1) Pakistan has a long history of being a safe haven for terrorists.

2) Slaughtering tourists is not okay.

Killing civilians in a mosque is also not okay.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Am I the only one who thinks this is an appropriate response to the Kashmir attack?

How do you think this is appropriate?

This is crazy. And dangerous.

So was the Kashmir attack.

The question was not whether the Kashmir attack was ok. It was how is this appropriate?

Unless you think crazy and dangerous attacks are appropriate?

It is an officially declared attack within the non disputed borders of Pakistan by the Indian military.