Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sorry but if attending make-up time trials vs the regular time trials is the difference between your swimmer making their A meet or not, then LC meets really don't matter for your swimmer.
Sadly, this isn’t true at some pools. While there’s no risk in swimmers making A Meets, there is risk in getting left of the relay. Will be very possible that a LC Champs qualifying swimmer won’t make the relay at our summer pool this year.
Wouldn’t this just be in an issue for the first A meet relay? Swimmer could swim it for time in the first B meet and earn spot on relay for subsequent meets and relay carnival.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sorry but if attending make-up time trials vs the regular time trials is the difference between your swimmer making their A meet or not, then LC meets really don't matter for your swimmer.
Sadly, this isn’t true at some pools. While there’s no risk in swimmers making A Meets, there is risk in getting left of the relay. Will be very possible that a LC Champs qualifying swimmer won’t make the relay at our summer pool this year.
Wouldn’t this just be in an issue for the first A meet relay? Swimmer could swim it for time in the first B meet and earn spot on relay for subsequent meets and relay carnival.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sorry but if attending make-up time trials vs the regular time trials is the difference between your swimmer making their A meet or not, then LC meets really don't matter for your swimmer.
Sadly, this isn’t true at some pools. While there’s no risk in swimmers making A Meets, there is risk in getting left of the relay. Will be very possible that a LC Champs qualifying swimmer won’t make the relay at our summer pool this year.
Anonymous wrote:Sorry but if attending make-up time trials vs the regular time trials is the difference between your swimmer making their A meet or not, then LC meets really don't matter for your swimmer.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sorry but if attending make-up time trials vs the regular time trials is the difference between your swimmer making their A meet or not, then LC meets really don't matter for your swimmer.
Our team doesn’t do make up time trials, it seems that some do, most don’t.
Our team also will not let you use last year’s time. So, no time trials or B meet 2 days later, no first A meet.
Anonymous wrote:It’s possible FISH can’t get the St James on Friday, but flipping the 13&O with 12&U (or 10&U) would solve the problem. Of course, it will become over-subscribed if they do that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DMV summer swim culture is so insufferable. To paraphrase the great Allen Iverson, “we’re talkin’ about rec swim time trials man, not a high level meet, rec swim time trials”.
😂😂😂👏👏👏
Anonymous wrote:Sorry but if attending make-up time trials vs the regular time trials is the difference between your swimmer making their A meet or not, then LC meets really don't matter for your swimmer.
Anonymous wrote:DMV summer swim culture is so insufferable. To paraphrase the great Allen Iverson, “we’re talkin’ about rec swim time trials man, not a high level meet, rec swim time trials”.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s possible FISH can’t get the St James on Friday, but flipping the 13&O with 12&U (or 10&U) would solve the problem. Of course, it will become over-subscribed if they do that.
I disagree with this. It is more important for 13&O to make this meet than 12&U or 10&U. It is LC and really it does not matter if a 12&U is even swimming LC. But, it does very much matter to the 13&O who are trying to make futures cut and swim in college.
LC should be something fun to try. Too many parents around here are nuts. Your kid is 12 and it is one meet, who cares. They might quit swimming at 16, then what? Wow, they want better cut times for champs and they are 11, why? Seriously. I now know what coaches just roll their eyes at families around here.
If these 12&U are still swimming (because somehow their parents did not burn them out) they will be complaining if their 13&O can't swim because of Time Trial conflicts.
As the parent of a 13 and over swimmer I can tell you that the older club kids really don’t care about time trials. They either use their time from last season or do the make-up time trial. It’s really not as big of a deal as the parents of the 12 and unders make it out to be.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s possible FISH can’t get the St James on Friday, but flipping the 13&O with 12&U (or 10&U) would solve the problem. Of course, it will become over-subscribed if they do that.
I disagree with this. It is more important for 13&O to make this meet than 12&U or 10&U. It is LC and really it does not matter if a 12&U is even swimming LC. But, it does very much matter to the 13&O who are trying to make futures cut and swim in college.
LC should be something fun to try. Too many parents around here are nuts. Your kid is 12 and it is one meet, who cares. They might quit swimming at 16, then what? Wow, they want better cut times for champs and they are 11, why? Seriously. I now know what coaches just roll their eyes at families around here.
If these 12&U are still swimming (because somehow their parents did not burn them out) they will be complaining if their 13&O can't swim because of Time Trial conflicts.