Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Amalyn in North Bethesda. 4,000-6,000 sq foot modern houses plopped in an established neighborhood of 1960s homes. Yes, I live in one of them
Curious what's bad about it? Just that the rest of bethesda is 1960s?
It seems to me what PP wrote is self explanatory.
New big modern houses don’t fit harmoniously with established 1960s homes in the same neighborhood.
Isn't the whole neighborhood big modern? My 1960s bethesds neighborhood is sprinkled with out of place new builds that don't fit in
Anonymous wrote:National Harbor in Maryland. There's one way in and out, it's always a traffic nightmare.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Amalyn in North Bethesda. 4,000-6,000 sq foot modern houses plopped in an established neighborhood of 1960s homes. Yes, I live in one of them
Curious what's bad about it? Just that the rest of bethesda is 1960s?
It seems to me what PP wrote is self explanatory.
New big modern houses don’t fit harmoniously with established 1960s homes in the same neighborhood.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Tysons
Many years ago, I worked for an ad agency in LA. Our clients were luxury brands like Tiffany and Cartier. While developing advertising plans to support their retail stores, “Tyson’s” was always a key market for the client. Since I had never lived in the DC area, I envisioned a super luxurious Beverly Hills / Rodeo Drive type shopping area, our perhaps an outdoor shopping center like Fashion Island. When I moved to DC five years ago, I was so excited to finally see Tysons! I drove around and around, thinking there was some hidden gem of a high street/shopping area that I kept missing. Nope, Tysons is just a convergence of highways, strip malls and parking lots. I just couldn’t believe the disconnect between my perception and the reality of Tyson’s.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Amalyn in North Bethesda. 4,000-6,000 sq foot modern houses plopped in an established neighborhood of 1960s homes. Yes, I live in one of them
Curious what's bad about it? Just that the rest of bethesda is 1960s?
It seems to me what PP wrote is self explanatory.
New big modern houses don’t fit harmoniously with established 1960s homes in the same neighborhood.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Amalyn in North Bethesda. 4,000-6,000 sq foot modern houses plopped in an established neighborhood of 1960s homes. Yes, I live in one of them
Curious what's bad about it? Just that the rest of bethesda is 1960s?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Tysons
Many years ago, I worked for an ad agency in LA. Our clients were luxury brands like Tiffany and Cartier. While developing advertising plans to support their retail stores, “Tyson’s” was always a key market for the client. Since I had never lived in the DC area, I envisioned a super luxurious Beverly Hills / Rodeo Drive type shopping area, our perhaps an outdoor shopping center like Fashion Island. When I moved to DC five years ago, I was so excited to finally see Tysons! I drove around and around, thinking there was some hidden gem of a high street/shopping area that I kept missing. Nope, Tysons is just a convergence of highways, strip malls and parking lots. I just couldn’t believe the disconnect between my perception and the reality of Tyson’s.
Harsh but so warranted. I live in another state and our luxury mall where celebrities and pro athletes shop is in an ugly area just like Tysons.
I think malls from the 70s looked fresher architecturally when everything new was brutalist concrete architecture.
I see the same effect on college campuses. The 1960s-1980s buildings are usually the hideous ones. Before and after usually look like buildings you won't hate the look of in 50 more years.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Tysons
Many years ago, I worked for an ad agency in LA. Our clients were luxury brands like Tiffany and Cartier. While developing advertising plans to support their retail stores, “Tyson’s” was always a key market for the client. Since I had never lived in the DC area, I envisioned a super luxurious Beverly Hills / Rodeo Drive type shopping area, our perhaps an outdoor shopping center like Fashion Island. When I moved to DC five years ago, I was so excited to finally see Tysons! I drove around and around, thinking there was some hidden gem of a high street/shopping area that I kept missing. Nope, Tysons is just a convergence of highways, strip malls and parking lots. I just couldn’t believe the disconnect between my perception and the reality of Tyson’s.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Tysons
Many years ago, I worked for an ad agency in LA. Our clients were luxury brands like Tiffany and Cartier. While developing advertising plans to support their retail stores, “Tyson’s” was always a key market for the client. Since I had never lived in the DC area, I envisioned a super luxurious Beverly Hills / Rodeo Drive type shopping area, our perhaps an outdoor shopping center like Fashion Island. When I moved to DC five years ago, I was so excited to finally see Tysons! I drove around and around, thinking there was some hidden gem of a high street/shopping area that I kept missing. Nope, Tysons is just a convergence of highways, strip malls and parking lots. I just couldn’t believe the disconnect between my perception and the reality of Tyson’s.
Anonymous wrote:Amalyn in North Bethesda. 4,000-6,000 sq foot modern houses plopped in an established neighborhood of 1960s homes. Yes, I live in one of them
Anonymous wrote:I think it's Georgetown, or rather how they have NOT planned getting in and out of there.
Key bridge dump at bottom of M street gives me nightmares. That weird exit off key bridge to whitehurst that is like a side highway sidearm is super creepy. A beautiful riverfront area that's now in the shadow of the creepy freeway. I've said creepy a few times, so that's how I feel. Not sure why. I never go there anymore.
![]()