Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
That is incorrect. Read the precedent below. Hopefully the lawyers that Harvard is producing know their case law, unlike DCUM.
Bob Jones University (BJU) had its tax-exempt status revoked by the IRS in the 1970s due to its racially discriminatory admissions policies. This action was upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court in Bob Jones University v. United States (1983), which established that tax-exempt status can be denied to organizations that violate public policy, including racial discrimination. However, the university later regained its tax-exempt status after dropping the ban on interracial dating in 2000.
Please identify the Harvard policy that, under Bob Jones, justifies revoking Harvard's tax-exempt status.
Anonymous wrote:Did you even read Harvard's own report on anti-Semitism on campus? That report is littered with smoking guns.
Anonymous wrote:
🫨 that was waay after I graduated from college.
I'm in a biracial marriage with kids. I guess they also did not allow multiracial children up until 2000? Wow. That's pointedly obvious discrimination.
Back to Harvard: but, what public policy is Harvard violating exactly? DEI is just "equal opportunity" badged in a different. How is that against public policy? Is Trump saying that they don't want EO anymore? Is allowing pro Palestinian protests against public policy? That would be against 1A, no?
Anonymous wrote:Dow, Nasdaq, and S&P up big good data. Priceless watching CNN reporting good economic news. Looks like liberals are going to have wait another month.
Anonymous wrote:
That is incorrect. Read the precedent below. Hopefully the lawyers that Harvard is producing know their case law, unlike DCUM.
Bob Jones University (BJU) had its tax-exempt status revoked by the IRS in the 1970s due to its racially discriminatory admissions policies. This action was upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court in Bob Jones University v. United States (1983), which established that tax-exempt status can be denied to organizations that violate public policy, including racial discrimination. However, the university later regained its tax-exempt status after dropping the ban on interracial dating in 2000.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If they revoke Harvard's tax exempt status, they will have to take Hillsdale's and all the rest.
Trump also can't revoke tax exempt status based on an Executive Order. There are laws governing who pays taxes, so any action would be years of litigation.
Also, he's firing all of the agents who enforce the rules. You can either control everybody, or you can have a small government. You can't have both.
That is incorrect. Read the precedent below. Hopefully the lawyers that Harvard is producing know their case law, unlike DCUM.
Bob Jones University (BJU) had its tax-exempt status revoked by the IRS in the 1970s due to its racially discriminatory admissions policies. This action was upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court in Bob Jones University v. United States (1983), which established that tax-exempt status can be denied to organizations that violate public policy, including racial discrimination. However, the university later regained its tax-exempt status after dropping the ban on interracial dating in 2000.
Anonymous wrote:If they revoke Harvard's tax exempt status, they will have to take Hillsdale's and all the rest.
Trump also can't revoke tax exempt status based on an Executive Order. There are laws governing who pays taxes, so any action would be years of litigation.
Also, he's firing all of the agents who enforce the rules. You can either control everybody, or you can have a small government. You can't have both.
Anonymous wrote:Very good economic news keep it coming!
Anonymous wrote:Very good economic news keep it coming!