Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Supremes are likely to tear down the separation between church and state. While charter schools are considered public bodies, the Supremes seemingly will allow religious organizations to sponsor charter schools. Presumably, charter schools sponsored by religious organizations will promote or at least teach their own doctrines. So, are we okay with a child attending a Catholic sponsored charter school hearing about the evils of being gay or being a Protestant? Are we okay with a child of Catholic parents attending a school sponsored by strict Protestants hearing about the evils of Catholicism or even the Reformation? Can these religious based schools discriminate against those of other religions? What about rural America where few, if any, options exist? Are we okay with a child of Jewish parents in rural America having no option other than to attend an evangelical sponsored school? The fact is that religious based charter schools break down the separation of church and state and are contrary to the First Amendment. This country was founded in large part by those fleeing the religious wars in Europe.

I'm a Catholic school teacher who is very strongly opposed to religious charter schools, because I believe in the separation of church and state.

But I am confused by the bolded. Existing Catholic schools don't teach what is bolded. Why would you think that a Catholic charter school would?

My kids go to Catholic school and they absolutely taught that gay people were going to hell.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As someone who was discriminated against on the basis of my sexual orientation in a religious setting, I hope that we as a society will fully explore the choice we are making when we make religious charter schools possible. Are we making it basically impossible to outlaw discrimination in the public sector on the basis of sexual orientation?

Most if not all Catholic seminarians are gay.

Anonymous wrote:As someone who was discriminated against on the basis of my sexual orientation in a religious setting, I hope that we as a society will fully explore the choice we are making when we make religious charter schools possible. Are we making it basically impossible to outlaw discrimination in the public sector on the basis of sexual orientation?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Supremes are likely to tear down the separation between church and state. While charter schools are considered public bodies, the Supremes seemingly will allow religious organizations to sponsor charter schools. Presumably, charter schools sponsored by religious organizations will promote or at least teach their own doctrines. So, are we okay with a child attending a Catholic sponsored charter school hearing about the evils of being gay or being a Protestant? Are we okay with a child of Catholic parents attending a school sponsored by strict Protestants hearing about the evils of Catholicism or even the Reformation? Can these religious based schools discriminate against those of other religions? What about rural America where few, if any, options exist? Are we okay with a child of Jewish parents in rural America having no option other than to attend an evangelical sponsored school? The fact is that religious based charter schools break down the separation of church and state and are contrary to the First Amendment. This country was founded in large part by those fleeing the religious wars in Europe.

I'm a Catholic school teacher who is very strongly opposed to religious charter schools, because I believe in the separation of church and state.

But I am confused by the bolded. Existing Catholic schools don't teach what is bolded. Why would you think that a Catholic charter school would?

SO the catholic Church doesn't think it's bad to be gay anymore? that's good, especially considering that most of their clergy is gay.

The church views sex that is not procreative as sinful. But you knew that. No one is supposed to have sex unless you are trying to have a baby. It's a stupid doctrine in the vast majority of people's opinions and almost no one follows that doctrine, and the church knows it because they hear confessions every day.

Do you mean that bored housewives talk about their sex lives to priests in private confessions? Creepy!! Do they do that for kicks???

Or is it the men who do?

Housewives? Sexist outdated language alert.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Supremes are likely to tear down the separation between church and state. While charter schools are considered public bodies, the Supremes seemingly will allow religious organizations to sponsor charter schools. Presumably, charter schools sponsored by religious organizations will promote or at least teach their own doctrines. So, are we okay with a child attending a Catholic sponsored charter school hearing about the evils of being gay or being a Protestant? Are we okay with a child of Catholic parents attending a school sponsored by strict Protestants hearing about the evils of Catholicism or even the Reformation? Can these religious based schools discriminate against those of other religions? What about rural America where few, if any, options exist? Are we okay with a child of Jewish parents in rural America having no option other than to attend an evangelical sponsored school? The fact is that religious based charter schools break down the separation of church and state and are contrary to the First Amendment. This country was founded in large part by those fleeing the religious wars in Europe.

I'm a Catholic school teacher who is very strongly opposed to religious charter schools, because I believe in the separation of church and state.

But I am confused by the bolded. Existing Catholic schools don't teach what is bolded. Why would you think that a Catholic charter school would?

SO the catholic Church doesn't think it's bad to be gay anymore? that's good, especially considering that most of their clergy is gay.

The church views sex that is not procreative as sinful. But you knew that. No one is supposed to have sex unless you are trying to have a baby. It's a stupid doctrine in the vast majority of people's opinions and almost no one follows that doctrine, and the church knows it because they hear confessions every day.

Do you mean that bored housewives talk about their sex lives to priests in private confessions? Creepy!! Do they do that for kicks???

Or is it the men who do?

Anonymous wrote:Charter schools already discriminate without existence of a religious theme.

Anonymous wrote:The Supremes are likely to tear down the separation between church and state. While charter schools are considered public bodies, the Supremes seemingly will allow religious organizations to sponsor charter schools. Presumably, charter schools sponsored by religious organizations will promote or at least teach their own doctrines. So, are we okay with a child attending a Catholic sponsored charter school hearing about the evils of being gay or being a Protestant? Are we okay with a child of Catholic parents attending a school sponsored by strict Protestants hearing about the evils of Catholicism or even the Reformation? Can these religious based schools discriminate against those of other religions? What about rural America where few, if any, options exist? Are we okay with a child of Jewish parents in rural America having no option other than to attend an evangelical sponsored school? The fact is that religious based charter schools break down the separation of church and state and are contrary to the First Amendment. This country was founded in large part by those fleeing the religious wars in Europe.




No we are not
Given Maga s stupidity this is what will be there is no going back now
Americans are dumb hence this takeover of the religious right is here to stay I can not wait fir maga to suffer

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Supremes are likely to tear down the separation between church and state. While charter schools are considered public bodies, the Supremes seemingly will allow religious organizations to sponsor charter schools. Presumably, charter schools sponsored by religious organizations will promote or at least teach their own doctrines. So, are we okay with a child attending a Catholic sponsored charter school hearing about the evils of being gay or being a Protestant? Are we okay with a child of Catholic parents attending a school sponsored by strict Protestants hearing about the evils of Catholicism or even the Reformation? Can these religious based schools discriminate against those of other religions? What about rural America where few, if any, options exist? Are we okay with a child of Jewish parents in rural America having no option other than to attend an evangelical sponsored school? The fact is that religious based charter schools break down the separation of church and state and are contrary to the First Amendment. This country was founded in large part by those fleeing the religious wars in Europe.

I'm a Catholic school teacher who is very strongly opposed to religious charter schools, because I believe in the separation of church and state.

But I am confused by the bolded. Existing Catholic schools don't teach what is bolded. Why would you think that a Catholic charter school would?

SO the catholic Church doesn't think it's bad to be gay anymore? that's good, especially considering that most of their clergy is gay.

The church views sex that is not procreative as sinful. But you knew that. No one is supposed to have sex unless you are trying to have a baby. It's a stupid doctrine in the vast majority of people's opinions and almost no one follows that doctrine, and the church knows it because they hear confessions every day.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Supremes are likely to tear down the separation between church and state. While charter schools are considered public bodies, the Supremes seemingly will allow religious organizations to sponsor charter schools. Presumably, charter schools sponsored by religious organizations will promote or at least teach their own doctrines. So, are we okay with a child attending a Catholic sponsored charter school hearing about the evils of being gay or being a Protestant? Are we okay with a child of Catholic parents attending a school sponsored by strict Protestants hearing about the evils of Catholicism or even the Reformation? Can these religious based schools discriminate against those of other religions? What about rural America where few, if any, options exist? Are we okay with a child of Jewish parents in rural America having no option other than to attend an evangelical sponsored school? The fact is that religious based charter schools break down the separation of church and state and are contrary to the First Amendment. This country was founded in large part by those fleeing the religious wars in Europe.

I'm a Catholic school teacher who is very strongly opposed to religious charter schools, because I believe in the separation of church and state.

But I am confused by the bolded. Existing Catholic schools don't teach what is bolded. Why would you think that a Catholic charter school would?

SO the catholic Church doesn't think it's bad to be gay anymore? that's good, especially considering that most of their clergy is gay.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Supremes are likely to tear down the separation between church and state. While charter schools are considered public bodies, the Supremes seemingly will allow religious organizations to sponsor charter schools. Presumably, charter schools sponsored by religious organizations will promote or at least teach their own doctrines. So, are we okay with a child attending a Catholic sponsored charter school hearing about the evils of being gay or being a Protestant? Are we okay with a child of Catholic parents attending a school sponsored by strict Protestants hearing about the evils of Catholicism or even the Reformation? Can these religious based schools discriminate against those of other religions? What about rural America where few, if any, options exist? Are we okay with a child of Jewish parents in rural America having no option other than to attend an evangelical sponsored school? The fact is that religious based charter schools break down the separation of church and state and are contrary to the First Amendment. This country was founded in large part by those fleeing the religious wars in Europe.

I'm a Catholic school teacher who is very strongly opposed to religious charter schools, because I believe in the separation of church and state.

But I am confused by the bolded. Existing Catholic schools don't teach what is bolded. Why would you think that a Catholic charter school would?