Anonymous wrote:Great time to switch to soy. Itβs actually very healthy and great tasting if you buy the unsweetened version.
The way cows are separated from their calfs for our milk obsession breaks my heart. That milk is for them, not for us!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Raw is better for you anyways drink that instead.
Please stop. Somebody could die if they read that and think itβs true. Not a joke.
Who is so stupid that they would just believe something an anonymous person wrote on the internet?! And if they would, maybe β¦.?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hey maybe this is how we get rid of a bunch of morons in this country. I hope they all drink raw milk and natural consequences just take care of them.
Sadly, without testing none of us are safe. Not sure how this meshes with Jr.βs health kick nonsense. Guess we should take up menthol cigarette smoking instead. Idiots.
Yeah I realize that. I'm just saying those who think drinking raw milk is fine and we don't need testing in the first place could take care of themselves.![]()
![]()
Anonymous wrote:Raw is better for you anyways drink that instead.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hey maybe this is how we get rid of a bunch of morons in this country. I hope they all drink raw milk and natural consequences just take care of them.
Sadly, without testing none of us are safe. Not sure how this meshes with Jr.βs health kick nonsense. Guess we should take up menthol cigarette smoking instead. Idiots.
Anonymous wrote:Hey maybe this is how we get rid of a bunch of morons in this country. I hope they all drink raw milk and natural consequences just take care of them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Raw is better for you anyways drink that instead.
The benefit of not raw was the whole "it won't kill you!" thing.
If they're getting rid of that...
Raw milk: 0β2 deaths since 2000.
Pasteurized milk: 3β17 deaths since 2000.
Anonymous wrote:Why do people think pasteurization is bad? Just insane whack a doodle nonsense. It is just gentle, slow heating, that's about it. They're not adding any chemicals or anything. America is full of morons. Give em raw milk and watch em die or get sick because they think some minor heating is bad.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Raw is better for you anyways drink that instead.
The benefit of not raw was the whole "it won't kill you!" thing.
If they're getting rid of that...
Raw milk: 0β2 deaths since 2000.
Pasteurized milk: 3β17 deaths since 2000.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Raw is better for you anyways drink that instead.
Only if you have your own cow in your backyard. Otherwise, no.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Raw is better for you anyways drink that instead.
The benefit of not raw was the whole "it won't kill you!" thing.
If they're getting rid of that...
Raw milk: 0β2 deaths since 2000.
Pasteurized milk: 3β17 deaths since 2000.
Now do it with deaths per 1000 people or 1000 glasses or something like that. Since the numbers of people willing to risk drinking raw milk is extremely small vs the (hundreds of ?) millions who regularly drink pasteurized milk, just reporting numbers of deaths known or assumed to be related to pasteurized vs raw milk like that is deliberately deceptive.