Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I refuse to give group projects. It means I have to grade 4x as many submissions, but I don't feel right allowing any student to get marks for another student's ability/knowledge.
Any assessment is individual, completed in class only so that mom/dad can't do it and Johnny can't have Jimmy do his work.
In English, collaborative work is in the SOL framework. It’s a standard they’re supposed to cover. We do all the group work in class because they’re not large projects and this way we know the parents didn’t do and the kids have to have accountability for how they participated and showed up in their group. But it’s an important skill for them to learn.
It’s not. It’s really not. I know someone somewhere in the school admin org chart thinks this, but it’s not true. Kids need to learn how to produce good work on their own. Group projects teaches slackers how to slack. That’s all that comes out of it, and that isn’t good for anyone. It’s not good for the slacker, and it’s not good for the kid who has to pick up their slack. It doesn’t teach them how to function in the real world. It teaches them behaviors that will get them fired.
It does reduce the amount of grading that teachers have to do, and I get that our teachers are over worked, but forcing kids to do group projects is not the solution to that problem.
Anonymous wrote:My kid who is studious and conscientious really dislikes group projects. He usually ends up doing most of the project. He especially despises when the teacher groups him with 1-2 students who do nothing to very little instead of having the students who are hard working grouped together.
Teachers almost always tell the class they can see who is doing the work and who isn't and they are going to grade accordingly. It never seems to happen. If anyone in my son's group ever complains to the teacher the teacher says some BS about in the real world you have to learn to work together so they have to deal with it. At times my son has lost points because he asked the teacher what to do if someone says they are going to turn in their part but then never does after the group members beg the student to complete the work.
How do I know the slacker kids get the grade as the student who has put in all the hours? I have another child who is the slacker. He is a bright but does the minimal. He often seem to find a group to join with a Type A girl. From the get go he goes up and tells her he is willing to relinquish all control to her and she can do the whole thing and he will stay out of her way. He is good at presenting so he says he will present whatever she writes up for him if there is a presentation.
Slacker son also chooses a student whose parents with advanced degrees do the work for the student so they get the best grade. Those parents really like my slacker kid because he is willing to go along with not doing anything but is smart enough to be able to answer questions if asked and not tell anyone the parents are really doing the work. So he ends up getting A's for doing absolutely nothing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I refuse to give group projects. It means I have to grade 4x as many submissions, but I don't feel right allowing any student to get marks for another student's ability/knowledge.
Any assessment is individual, completed in class only so that mom/dad can't do it and Johnny can't have Jimmy do his work.
In English, collaborative work is in the SOL framework. It’s a standard they’re supposed to cover. We do all the group work in class because they’re not large projects and this way we know the parents didn’t do and the kids have to have accountability for how they participated and showed up in their group. But it’s an important skill for them to learn.
It’s not. It’s really not. I know someone somewhere in the school admin org chart thinks this, but it’s not true. Kids need to learn how to produce good work on their own. Group projects teaches slackers how to slack. That’s all that comes out of it, and that isn’t good for anyone. It’s not good for the slacker, and it’s not good for the kid who has to pick up their slack. It doesn’t teach them how to function in the real world. It teaches them behaviors that will get them fired.
It does reduce the amount of grading that teachers have to do, and I get that our teachers are over worked, but forcing kids to do group projects is not the solution to that problem.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I refuse to give group projects. It means I have to grade 4x as many submissions, but I don't feel right allowing any student to get marks for another student's ability/knowledge.
Any assessment is individual, completed in class only so that mom/dad can't do it and Johnny can't have Jimmy do his work.
In English, collaborative work is in the SOL framework. It’s a standard they’re supposed to cover. We do all the group work in class because they’re not large projects and this way we know the parents didn’t do and the kids have to have accountability for how they participated and showed up in their group. But it’s an important skill for them to learn.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I refuse to give group projects. It means I have to grade 4x as many submissions, but I don't feel right allowing any student to get marks for another student's ability/knowledge.
Any assessment is individual, completed in class only so that mom/dad can't do it and Johnny can't have Jimmy do his work.
In English, collaborative work is in the SOL framework. It’s a standard they’re supposed to cover. We do all the group work in class because they’re not large projects and this way we know the parents didn’t do and the kids have to have accountability for how they participated and showed up in their group. But it’s an important skill for them to learn.
I hope the poster who thinks it's about "kind" or "unkind" teachers reads this.
A lot of people would be shocked by how little autonomy teachers in certain grades/subjects/districts have.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I refuse to give group projects. It means I have to grade 4x as many submissions, but I don't feel right allowing any student to get marks for another student's ability/knowledge.
Any assessment is individual, completed in class only so that mom/dad can't do it and Johnny can't have Jimmy do his work.
In English, collaborative work is in the SOL framework. It’s a standard they’re supposed to cover. We do all the group work in class because they’re not large projects and this way we know the parents didn’t do and the kids have to have accountability for how they participated and showed up in their group. But it’s an important skill for them to learn.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A kind HS teachers gives kids the option to work in a group or alone. My son always chooses alone. It's the same effort either way, why boost up some other kid and stress.
When they get to college, they may run into trouble if they don;t know how to handle group projects (depending on their major).
Anonymous wrote:A kind HS teachers gives kids the option to work in a group or alone. My son always chooses alone. It's the same effort either way, why boost up some other kid and stress.
Anonymous wrote:Most teachers know. when they assign a group project, who is going to do all of the work and who isn’t. It’s a big deal to the parent and the kid who have to see this all play out over the course of the project. But in 90% of the groups, the teacher already knows who is doing the heavy lifting and who is on a smoke break.
Anonymous wrote:Most teachers know. when they assign a group project, who is going to do all of the work and who isn’t. It’s a big deal to the parent and the kid who have to see this all play out over the course of the project. But in 90% of the groups, the teacher already knows who is doing the heavy lifting and who is on a smoke break.
Anonymous wrote:I refuse to give group projects. It means I have to grade 4x as many submissions, but I don't feel right allowing any student to get marks for another student's ability/knowledge.
Any assessment is individual, completed in class only so that mom/dad can't do it and Johnny can't have Jimmy do his work.