Anonymous wrote:If you are fat and your spouse is height/weight proportionate, then you are the likely cause for them to be non-physical
Anonymous wrote:In our 50s, I want sex much more than DH. We’re at like 1-2x a week, but when life gets in the way it can be zero. I wish he’d try harder to make it happen more often, but it’s just not important to him the way it is to me. Also, when it does happen, it just doesn’t feel like he has the passion or energy, and isn’t super concerned about my enjoyment the way that he used to be. It is a source of disappointment and resentment for me, but I’ll take what I can get, and appreciate when we actually get our two times a week (although I prefer more). If we stopped completely, there is no way we could be best friends or any sort of friends because I would be so angry.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How common is for middle-age women to be reasonably happily married to a man who is not "physical" (and where there is no longer a particularly fantastic emotional fulfillment either) and where the dynamics is mainly that of best friends? Is it because the man is financially stable, a good father, an overall decent person? Is it mainly due to mutual respect, common history, and common goals especially involving kids?
If anyone has any answers to this I would really love to know. In my case my wife is the non-physical one. It's cheaper to keep her than to let her go.
Anonymous wrote:Could they have low testosterone?
Anonymous wrote:In our 50s, I want sex much more than DH. We’re at like 1-2x a week, but when life gets in the way it can be zero. I wish he’d try harder to make it happen more often, but it’s just not important to him the way it is to me. Also, when it does happen, it just doesn’t feel like he has the passion or energy, and isn’t super concerned about my enjoyment the way that he used to be. It is a source of disappointment and resentment for me, but I’ll take what I can get, and appreciate when we actually get our two times a week (although I prefer more). If we stopped completely, there is no way we could be best friends or any sort of friends because I would be so angry.
Anonymous wrote:This is common. As people age, they generally have sex less often than when they were young until it eventually dwindles to hardly ever.
But, maybe they exchange a kiss or a pat or a hug or cuddle. In other words, no sex is not marriage ending.
Anonymous wrote:How common is for middle-age women to be reasonably happily married to a man who is not "physical" (and where there is no longer a particularly fantastic emotional fulfillment either) and where the dynamics is mainly that of best friends? Is it because the man is financially stable, a good father, an overall decent person? Is it mainly due to mutual respect, common history, and common goals especially involving kids?
Anonymous wrote:This is common. As people age, they generally have sex less often than when they were young until it eventually dwindles to hardly ever.
But, maybe they exchange a kiss or a pat or a hug or cuddle. In other words, no sex is not marriage ending.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Generally, we find that the spouse who is no longer interested is actually still interested but not in their spouse.
Sadly, this is true. I thought my husband was asexual until he caught an STD.
Anonymous wrote:Generally, we find that the spouse who is no longer interested is actually still interested but not in their spouse.
Anonymous wrote:If you are fat and your spouse is height/weight proportionate, then you are the likely cause for them to be non-physical