Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hate to say it as a county resident, but I think it’s over for that development. You just can’t be a hub for crowds of teens and also attract shoppers.

It's not that hard:
1. No more face masks
2. Curfews for teens
3. Aggressive use of stop and frisk
4. Aggressive use of pretextual traffic stops

All of these are perfectly legal. If you polled county residents, probably 90% would support these things. Why do we let the thugs control policy?

"No more face masks" how ignorant are you? My doctor still advises me to wear a mask.

Because you refuse to get COVID booster vaccines annually. More common in certain demographics

What? They just shot him for fun? That’s it, it’s time for a riot.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Was he armed?

With a knife?

That he used to stab two people?

Who were the real victims?

What? The story says he had a gun, but it doesn’t say anything about a stabbing?

The story is incoherent, but it does mention stabbing and arson.

https://www.wusa9.com/article/news/live_breaking/officer-involved-shooting-prompts-major-police-response-road-closures-in-national-harbor-oxon-hill-easter-weekend/65-28ef36da-d92f-4858-9302-53f4663aafad

Anonymous wrote:OP your title should have read: "A man armed with a gun was shot and killed by police Sunday afternoon," but you knew this. I see you. Nice try though.

The cops were also armed with guns. So we can shoot them?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hate to say it as a county resident, but I think it’s over for that development. You just can’t be a hub for crowds of teens and also attract shoppers.

It's not that hard:
1. No more face masks
2. Curfews for teens
3. Aggressive use of stop and frisk
4. Aggressive use of pretextual traffic stops

All of these are perfectly legal. If you polled county residents, probably 90% would support these things. Why do we let the thugs control policy?

Umm no, not aggressive use of stop and frisk.
I agree with face masks and teen curfew.

Face masks are necessary to protect us from COVID.

Even Fauci admitted there’s no evidence.

There is plenty of evidence for airborne diseases not crossing N95 or KF94 barriers. The cloth masks aren’t recommended and those were a mistake.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hate to say it as a county resident, but I think it’s over for that development. You just can’t be a hub for crowds of teens and also attract shoppers.

It's not that hard:
1. No more face masks
2. Curfews for teens
3. Aggressive use of stop and frisk
4. Aggressive use of pretextual traffic stops

All of these are perfectly legal. If you polled county residents, probably 90% would support these things. Why do we let the thugs control policy?

Those of us with health issues NEED to wear masks. As a parent, you give your kid a curfew and monitor them. Not ok to use aggressive tactics.

Agree with keeping face masks. My daughter is immunocompromised. Sometimes she needs to wear a mask.

All that’s needed is a visibly armed police presence patrolling around. It’s a huge deterrent.

Anonymous wrote:OP your title should have read: "A man armed with a gun was shot and killed by police Sunday afternoon," but you knew this. I see you. Nice try though.

OP probably would have preferred cops didn’t take down the perp, because a massacre would kill innocent people.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hate to say it as a county resident, but I think it’s over for that development. You just can’t be a hub for crowds of teens and also attract shoppers.

It's not that hard:
1. No more face masks
2. Curfews for teens
3. Aggressive use of stop and frisk
4. Aggressive use of pretextual traffic stops

All of these are perfectly legal. If you polled county residents, probably 90% would support these things. Why do we let the thugs control policy?

Umm no, not aggressive use of stop and frisk.
I agree with face masks and teen curfew.

Face masks are necessary to protect us from COVID.

Even Fauci admitted there’s no evidence.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hate to say it as a county resident, but I think it’s over for that development. You just can’t be a hub for crowds of teens and also attract shoppers.

It's not that hard:
1. No more face masks
2. Curfews for teens
3. Aggressive use of stop and frisk
4. Aggressive use of pretextual traffic stops

All of these are perfectly legal. If you polled county residents, probably 90% would support these things. Why do we let the thugs control policy?

"No more face masks" how ignorant are you? My doctor still advises me to wear a mask.

That's 'cuz you fugly.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hate to say it as a county resident, but I think it’s over for that development. You just can’t be a hub for crowds of teens and also attract shoppers.

It's not that hard:
1. No more face masks
2. Curfews for teens
3. Aggressive use of stop and frisk
4. Aggressive use of pretextual traffic stops

All of these are perfectly legal. If you polled county residents, probably 90% would support these things. Why do we let the thugs control policy?

"No more face masks" how ignorant are you? My doctor still advises me to wear a mask.

I truly find it difficult to believe that any doctor advocates wearing a mask outdoors in 2025. It wasn't even the advice in 2021. Probably the advice is more like, "It's not necessary but you can wear one if you want to be very cautious." Honestly, if I see someone wearing one and they're not involved in a protest, my guess is that they are a criminal. And if there's a group of teens wearing them, I cross the street.

Anonymous wrote:Misleading thread topic much?

+10000 SHAMEFUL OP SHAMEFUL

OP your title should have read: "A man armed with a gun was shot and killed by police Sunday afternoon," but you knew this. I see you. Nice try though.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hate to say it as a county resident, but I think it’s over for that development. You just can’t be a hub for crowds of teens and also attract shoppers.

It's not that hard:
1. No more face masks
2. Curfews for teens
3. Aggressive use of stop and frisk
4. Aggressive use of pretextual traffic stops

All of these are perfectly legal. If you polled county residents, probably 90% would support these things. Why do we let the thugs control policy?

Umm no, not aggressive use of stop and frisk.
I agree with face masks and teen curfew.

Face masks are necessary to protect us from COVID.

It's 2025 and you sound insane.

Sounds like I need to start double masking.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hate to say it as a county resident, but I think it’s over for that development. You just can’t be a hub for crowds of teens and also attract shoppers.

It's not that hard:
1. No more face masks
2. Curfews for teens
3. Aggressive use of stop and frisk
4. Aggressive use of pretextual traffic stops

All of these are perfectly legal. If you polled county residents, probably 90% would support these things. Why do we let the thugs control policy?

"No more face masks" how ignorant are you? My doctor still advises me to wear a mask.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hate to say it as a county resident, but I think it’s over for that development. You just can’t be a hub for crowds of teens and also attract shoppers.

It's not that hard:
1. No more face masks
2. Curfews for teens
3. Aggressive use of stop and frisk
4. Aggressive use of pretextual traffic stops

All of these are perfectly legal. If you polled county residents, probably 90% would support these things. Why do we let the thugs control policy?

Umm no, not aggressive use of stop and frisk.
I agree with face masks and teen curfew.

Face masks are necessary to protect us from COVID.

It's 2025 and you sound insane.