Trump (praise and peace be upon him), is doing exactly what he said he would concerning the border, which is why he was elected. He is doing the will of the American people.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Stop using logic and common sense. You are supposed to only feel about the issue. Do not use your mind so that you can be triggered to protest against our great nation enforcing its laws.Anonymous wrote:It’s just semantics. If you want us to say no human is illegal, that’s fine. But humans can be illegal immigrants, right? Humans can do illegal things, right?
If a human enters the US illegally, that’s a criminal action. Would you prefer we can them “criminals”. That would be accurate, no?
"Great nation"
You seemed to have missed the bus
No one wants your pathetic feelings
There are clear historical reasons not to refer to other human beings in a inhumane way.
Trump regime knows what they are doing
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:First you have to make them seem not human...
Hitler playbook
+ 1,000%!
Dehumanizing your enemy is vitally important to set up the conditions that will allow them to slaughtered on an industrial scale when you attain enough political power to start the process.
It all starts with isolating language and labeling them, to allow for cutting them off from “normal” people. Use words and labels that eliminate their humanity, and make it easier to allow them to be thought of as non-human.
Things like:
Irredeemables
Deplorables
Fascists
MAGAs
Zionists
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s just semantics. If you want us to say no human is illegal, that’s fine. But humans can be illegal immigrants, right? Humans can do illegal things, right?
If a human enters the US illegally, that’s a criminal action. Would you prefer we can them “criminals”. That would be accurate, no?
How about saying "undocumented" instead? When you get down to it the distinction is whether or not they have a birth certificate.
Most people from Oregon and New Hampshire use the term Sans-doc when referring to undocumented immigrants. I think it's appropriate.
My uncle grew up in NYC, speaking Italian (dialect); the child of immigrants from Italy. The bigoted slur he endured was similar: “WOP,” which was a derisive acronym slung at Italian immigrants, and which stood for “with out papers.”
Not going to use “Sans-doc.” Ever.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:First you have to make them seem not human...
Hitler playbook
+ 1,000%!
Dehumanizing your enemy is vitally important to set up the conditions that will allow them to slaughtered on an industrial scale when you attain enough political power to start the process.
It all starts with isolating language and labeling them, to allow for cutting them off from “normal” people. Use words and labels that eliminate their humanity, and make it easier to allow them to be thought of as non-human.
Things like:
Irredeemables
Deplorables
Fascists
MAGAs
Zionists
Is some one actually coming after these people or did they just hurt your feelings?
There is a difference, deplorable
And the fact that you threw Zionist in there!![]()
Let me tell you, I live in MAGA land and no one here would have included Zionist on that list. They don't care thst much though Trump cares.
That tells me who you are and what agenda you are pushing for Netanyahu lover
OP, what is your agenda in starting this thread?
What is your agenda in using the word "deplorables", considering that messaging has been hurting the Democrats for nearly a decade now?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:First you have to make them seem not human...
Hitler playbook
+ 1,000%!
Dehumanizing your enemy is vitally important to set up the conditions that will allow them to slaughtered on an industrial scale when you attain enough political power to start the process.
It all starts with isolating language and labeling them, to allow for cutting them off from “normal” people. Use words and labels that eliminate their humanity, and make it easier to allow them to be thought of as non-human.
Things like:
Irredeemables
Deplorables
Fascists
MAGAs
Zionists
Is some one actually coming after these people or did they just hurt your feelings?
There is a difference, deplorable
And the fact that you threw Zionist in there!![]()
Let me tell you, I live in MAGA land and no one here would have included Zionist on that list. They don't care thst much though Trump cares.
That tells me who you are and what agenda you are pushing for Netanyahu lover
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:First you have to make them seem not human...
Hitler playbook
+ 1,000%!
Dehumanizing your enemy is vitally important to set up the conditions that will allow them to slaughtered on an industrial scale when you attain enough political power to start the process.
It all starts with isolating language and labeling them, to allow for cutting them off from “normal” people. Use words and labels that eliminate their humanity, and make it easier to allow them to be thought of as non-human.
Things like:
Irredeemables
Deplorables
Fascists
MAGAs
Zionists
Anonymous wrote:Why is this basic message getting lost in the current news?
Anonymous wrote:First you have to make them seem not human...
Hitler playbook
Anonymous wrote:Obey laws and your actions won't be illegal.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s just semantics. If you want us to say no human is illegal, that’s fine. But humans can be illegal immigrants, right? Humans can do illegal things, right?
If a human enters the US illegally, that’s a criminal action. Would you prefer we can them “criminals”. That would be accurate, no?
How about saying "undocumented" instead? When you get down to it the distinction is whether or not they have a birth certificate.
Most people from Oregon and New Hampshire use the term Sans-doc when referring to undocumented immigrants. I think it's appropriate.
Anonymous wrote:Stop using logic and common sense. You are supposed to only feel about the issue. Do not use your mind so that you can be triggered to protest against our great nation enforcing its laws.Anonymous wrote:It’s just semantics. If you want us to say no human is illegal, that’s fine. But humans can be illegal immigrants, right? Humans can do illegal things, right?
If a human enters the US illegally, that’s a criminal action. Would you prefer we can them “criminals”. That would be accurate, no?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s just semantics. If you want us to say no human is illegal, that’s fine. But humans can be illegal immigrants, right? Humans can do illegal things, right?
If a human enters the US illegally, that’s a criminal action. Would you prefer we can them “criminals”. That would be accurate, no?
Semantics matter
Never read dystopian literature?
Never studied history?
Here comes liberal arts barista who failed algebra class.