Anonymous wrote:In all fairness, Powell is known for being late to the party as he waits for "what the data shows", he's often 2-6 behind as "the data" lags what's actually happening quite a bit.
Anonymous wrote:In all fairness, Powell is known for being late to the party as he waits for "what the data shows", he's often 2-6 behind as "the data" lags what's actually happening quite a bit.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:With the Trump administration running roughshod over the Constitution, I do not think that the SC will overturn Humphrey's Executor. Between that and the cases involving injunctions, I think even the right wing of the Court will act to reign him in . . . not because the right is particularly principled, but they do like their power and won't rule themselves into irrelevancy.
It's "rein him in." Like a horse's rein.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Trump would pick someone who will try to revert to the gold standard. Someone from the Austrian School or a hard core libertarian.
You say that like it's a bad thing...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Trump would pick someone who will try to revert to the gold standard. Someone from the Austrian School or a hard core libertarian.
You say that like it's a bad thing...
Sure, while the rest of the world is in the 21st century, we are going back to 1930. Make that make sense.
Is that when America was great?
The dollar certainly was.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Trump would pick someone who will try to revert to the gold standard. Someone from the Austrian School or a hard core libertarian.
You say that like it's a bad thing...
Sure, while the rest of the world is in the 21st century, we are going back to 1930. Make that make sense.
Is that when America was great?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Trump would pick someone who will try to revert to the gold standard. Someone from the Austrian School or a hard core libertarian.
You say that like it's a bad thing...
Sure, while the rest of the world is in the 21st century, we are going back to 1930. Make that make sense.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Trump would pick someone who will try to revert to the gold standard. Someone from the Austrian School or a hard core libertarian.
You say that like it's a bad thing...
Anonymous wrote:Trump is Captain of his own Titantic. May he go down with the ship he is dragging us all down with.
Anonymous wrote:Trump would pick someone who will try to revert to the gold standard. Someone from the Austrian School or a hard core libertarian.
Anonymous wrote:With the Trump administration running roughshod over the Constitution, I do not think that the SC will overturn Humphrey's Executor. Between that and the cases involving injunctions, I think even the right wing of the Court will act to reign him in . . . not because the right is particularly principled, but they do like their power and won't rule themselves into irrelevancy.