Anonymous wrote:People think acceleration means superior math knowledge. There is plenty of resesrch that shows acceleration isn’t best practice for most students and leads to gaps. Private schools take math slow and steady so the students understand the concepts and move on ready for the next math class. Don’t compare that with over accelerated and inflated grades from public
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:it depends on which private?Anonymous wrote:Math is t weak in private schools, it just isn’t as accelerated. Most schools top out at Calc BC, maybe multivar. If you have a kid who needs to go farther, you need public or outside enrichment. But the quality of the classes offered is generally very strong.
The top. I do see in Thomas Jefferson math is great. But not sure about private. I do see most kids in private supplementing it with tutors.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We live on the west coast in an area that is quite Asian (I am also Asian) and parents are intense about school and math. Nevertheless, our 50% Asian private school sucks at teaching math.
We have ~40 kids per grade. It’s just not enough kids to have good math until middle school, when math is leveled and improves in quality. We have some kind of weird curriculum that claims that heterogenous math groups are best for learning before 6th grade. The reality is that most private schools don’t have gifted pull-outs or leveled math groups, and all but the most talented teachers can’t teach to multiple levels at the same time. So one group in each room gets all the attention each year, and everyone else is on their own. One year my dC benefited from this arrangement because the math teacher really focused on their level, but most years DC ends up helping friends figure out the work.
80% of my child’s classmates have tutors this year. We don’t, but one of my DC’s classmates’ parents felt worried about my kid being at a disadvantage and so they copy all of the study guides from their tutor to give to our family.
That seems odd. My kids are in a private K-8 with about 50 kids in each grade and they start levelled math in 2nd grade. There are 5 math classes per grade. I assume this is the same in most privates in DC.
Anonymous wrote:We live on the west coast in an area that is quite Asian (I am also Asian) and parents are intense about school and math. Nevertheless, our 50% Asian private school sucks at teaching math.
We have ~40 kids per grade. It’s just not enough kids to have good math until middle school, when math is leveled and improves in quality. We have some kind of weird curriculum that claims that heterogenous math groups are best for learning before 6th grade. The reality is that most private schools don’t have gifted pull-outs or leveled math groups, and all but the most talented teachers can’t teach to multiple levels at the same time. So one group in each room gets all the attention each year, and everyone else is on their own. One year my dC benefited from this arrangement because the math teacher really focused on their level, but most years DC ends up helping friends figure out the work.
80% of my child’s classmates have tutors this year. We don’t, but one of my DC’s classmates’ parents felt worried about my kid being at a disadvantage and so they copy all of the study guides from their tutor to give to our family.
Anonymous wrote:Private schools in DC are not mainly for purposes of education. They are designed to eliminate misbehaved children, SN children, low SES status (with a few exceptions to make sure it’s “inclusive”), etc. while the parent screams “my child goes to an inclusive private”. They are there to make the parents feel better. A bragging right if you will. Education is secondary.
Anonymous wrote:Really rich people don’t need to be advanced in math. Competent, yes, but they don’t need to take calculus as a 10th grader. They don’t become engineers or god forbid computer scientists. If they run a hedge fund, they hire quant nerds to do the hard work while they ski and deal-make with the other lacrosse bros from Dartmouth.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:it depends on which private?Anonymous wrote:Math is t weak in private schools, it just isn’t as accelerated. Most schools top out at Calc BC, maybe multivar. If you have a kid who needs to go farther, you need public or outside enrichment. But the quality of the classes offered is generally very strong.
The top. I do see in Thomas Jefferson math is great. But not sure about private. I do see most kids in private supplementing it with tutors.
It really depends on the school. Which private are you talking about?
Top privates in dc.
My kids were in « top privates » in DC and we were very happy with the math education they received. They are no at a top 10 and an Ivy renowned for its economics nobel laureates and Math department. Not sure what mis information you are trying to spread here.
Anonymous wrote:The honest answer is there are less Asians in the private schools. The dc area public schools are so highly ranked not because they are great schools, but because there are so many Asian kids performing at a high level.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:it depends on which private?Anonymous wrote:Math is t weak in private schools, it just isn’t as accelerated. Most schools top out at Calc BC, maybe multivar. If you have a kid who needs to go farther, you need public or outside enrichment. But the quality of the classes offered is generally very strong.
The top. I do see in Thomas Jefferson math is great. But not sure about private. I do see most kids in private supplementing it with tutors.
It really depends on the school. Which private are you talking about?
Top privates in dc.
Anonymous wrote:The honest answer is there are less Asians in the private schools. The dc area public schools are so highly ranked not because they are great schools, but because there are so many Asian kids performing at a high level.
Anonymous wrote:Math has generally gotten weaker in the US over the last number of decades. This over time leads to smaller pool of teachers that are actually strong enough in math to allow deeper knowledge and love of the subject. Parents are largely in the same boat, so they don’t demand deeper math knowledge from the school. There is the argument that accelerated doesn’t mean they have better math knowledge, but for kids actually strong in math that isn’t true at all. Parents like that argument because it makes them feel that their kid is getting something as good, but in reality they just don’t know what they are missing. And don’t forget that most parents of kids in most expensive privates have strong preconceptions of quality of education in publics. We supplement at one of these schools to keep kids ahead of what school offers in math. Also I think it’s important for them to see teacher that are actually strong at math.