Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If they’re paid by the cruise ship they should be employed by the cruise ship.
You really do not understand how things work so you’d best sit this one out.
No, for real. Why shouldn't businesses just take care of themselves? If the business is paying for it, why not hire the people themselves? Nobody will answer the question. You all just keep calling people asking it names. Go ahead, answer the question.
Anonymous wrote:If they’re paid by the cruise ship they should be employed by the cruise ship.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This isn’t true.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/travel/cruises/2025/04/11/no-cuts-to-poop-patrol-cruise-sanitation-program-survives-hhs-shakeup/83051232007/
Newer news on this:
Perhaps this is true. But as a federal employee I can also say there are some blatant lies being said from this administration about what is going on at my agency. They like to play games with semantics (e.g. oh we’re not closing things, we’re consolidating them). Yes through layoffs and building closures but ok 🙄.
So sorry if I have a hard time believing a word out of any of the cabinet members’ mouths.
And the thing is we’ll never really know what they’re telling the truth about or not, so I just have to err on the side of thinking this whole administration is full of $h!t.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If they’re paid by the cruise ship they should be employed by the cruise ship.
You really do not understand how things work so you’d best sit this one out.
No, for real. Why shouldn't businesses just take care of themselves? If the business is paying for it, why not hire the people themselves? Nobody will answer the question. You all just keep calling people asking it names. Go ahead, answer the question.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If they’re paid by the cruise ship they should be employed by the cruise ship.
You really do not understand how things work so you’d best sit this one out.
No, for real. Why shouldn't businesses just take care of themselves? If the business is paying for it, why not hire the people themselves? Nobody will answer the question. You all just keep calling people asking it names. Go ahead, answer the question.
Anonymous wrote:Yup. No more cruises. Gross.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If they’re paid by the cruise ship they should be employed by the cruise ship.
And this is the type of brilliant mind making decisions for America right now.
Instead of hacks working for the government? Both systems are rotten. We need new ideas.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If they’re paid by the cruise ship they should be employed by the cruise ship.
And this is the type of brilliant mind making decisions for America right now.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If they’re paid by the cruise ship they should be employed by the cruise ship.
You really do not understand how things work so you’d best sit this one out.
Anonymous wrote:If they’re paid by the cruise ship they should be employed by the cruise ship.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This isn’t true.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/travel/cruises/2025/04/11/no-cuts-to-poop-patrol-cruise-sanitation-program-survives-hhs-shakeup/83051232007/
Newer news on this: