Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I talk to parents who know their kids are kind of mean and really just shrug it off. They tell themselves not everyone can be friends, kids are kids, what are they supposed to do when little Larla doesn't want to hang around with Larlette anymore. And they don't care because their kid is usually doing fine socially.
If they are confronted about specific behavior by another parent, they don't respond well and they tell everyone they know too and paint it like the other parent is a lunatic. This is why my go to advice is never say anything to the parents. Even if you think it went well, it didn't.
Well, part of that is true- if Larla has a number of good friends, and has had some disagreements with Larlette or they no longer share the same interests, why should they be forced to hang out together? It is true, not everyone can be friends. I don't think Larla should be mean to Larlette but it doesn't mean she has to invite her to her birthday, or choose her as a partner in class, or actively seek her out at recess, if she prefers different friends right now. It is not Larla's job to fix Larlette's social struggles. And yeah, if you confront Larla's mom about Larlette not being invited to something, you do kind of look like a lunatic, unless the "something" is a full class party and Larlette was the only one excluded (if that happens, i'm totally on Larlette's side, don't worry)
Anonymous wrote:I talk to parents who know their kids are kind of mean and really just shrug it off. They tell themselves not everyone can be friends, kids are kids, what are they supposed to do when little Larla doesn't want to hang around with Larlette anymore. And they don't care because their kid is usually doing fine socially.
If they are confronted about specific behavior by another parent, they don't respond well and they tell everyone they know too and paint it like the other parent is a lunatic. This is why my go to advice is never say anything to the parents. Even if you think it went well, it didn't.
Anonymous wrote:Oldest 2 boys are probably mean. They exclude other boys and hold weak ones in semi-open disdain. We didn’t teach them to be this way but it came to them naturally.
They’re not cruel, though. The funny thing is they’re rewarded for their behavior by the other boys and girls.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Oldest 2 boys are probably mean. They exclude other boys and hold weak ones in semi-open disdain. We didn’t teach them to be this way but it came to them naturally.
They’re not cruel, though. The funny thing is they’re rewarded for their behavior by the other boys and girls.
And you know you have to rein it in, instead of writing that out as if you were proud of them?
Disagree. They’re not cruel and it helps them socially. They were raised to be strong, so not sure why I’d try to teach them something different after all these years.
I am proud of their strength, and I should be. DH and I made choices to raise good men, and we got what we wanted.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Oldest 2 boys are probably mean. They exclude other boys and hold weak ones in semi-open disdain. We didn’t teach them to be this way but it came to them naturally.
They’re not cruel, though. The funny thing is they’re rewarded for their behavior by the other boys and girls.
I have a "weak", sensitive son (anxious, not very athletic) and if your son holds him in "semi open disdain" and actively excludes him, that sounds pretty cruel to me.
Anonymous wrote:Oldest 2 boys are probably mean. They exclude other boys and hold weak ones in semi-open disdain. We didn’t teach them to be this way but it came to them naturally.
They’re not cruel, though. The funny thing is they’re rewarded for their behavior by the other boys and girls.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Oldest 2 boys are probably mean. They exclude other boys and hold weak ones in semi-open disdain. We didn’t teach them to be this way but it came to them naturally.
They’re not cruel, though. The funny thing is they’re rewarded for their behavior by the other boys and girls.
And you know you have to rein it in, instead of writing that out as if you were proud of them?
Disagree. They’re not cruel and it helps them socially. They were raised to be strong, so not sure why I’d try to teach them something different after all these years.
I am proud of their strength, and I should be. DH and I made choices to raise good men, and we got what we wanted.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Oldest 2 boys are probably mean. They exclude other boys and hold weak ones in semi-open disdain. We didn’t teach them to be this way but it came to them naturally.
They’re not cruel, though. The funny thing is they’re rewarded for their behavior by the other boys and girls.
And you know you have to rein it in, instead of writing that out as if you were proud of them?
Disagree. They’re not cruel and it helps them socially. They were raised to be strong, so not sure why I’d try to teach them something different after all these years.
I am proud of their strength, and I should be. DH and I made choices to raise good men, and we got what we wanted.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Oldest 2 boys are probably mean. They exclude other boys and hold weak ones in semi-open disdain. We didn’t teach them to be this way but it came to them naturally.
They’re not cruel, though. The funny thing is they’re rewarded for their behavior by the other boys and girls.
And you know you have to rein it in, instead of writing that out as if you were proud of them?
Anonymous wrote:Oldest 2 boys are probably mean. They exclude other boys and hold weak ones in semi-open disdain. We didn’t teach them to be this way but it came to them naturally.
They’re not cruel, though. The funny thing is they’re rewarded for their behavior by the other boys and girls.