Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:But that is exactly what the program is encouraging. There is no major transaction. It's just recognizing good from students of actions already completed voluntarily. The transaction is the recognition. Have you never heard of positive encouragement to get more of what you'd like to see from children? Maybe if you remove the program you can have kids doing nasty things to each other and spending more time talking about those interactions. Sounds like a DCUM dream school.
DP, but I’d just prefer that the school teach good citizenship and behavior as part of a traditional civics class rather than come up with a contrived program like this. And OP sounds absolutely nutty in her effusiveness.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Welcome to DCUM, principal of Kilmer Middle School.
No reason to think it has to be a school employee.
Anyway, positive goings on at local schools is welcome news.
According to this forum, anytime anyone has anything positive or even non-negative to say, it’s due to a representative, etc pretending to be a real person. Disagree with SB bashing? You are in the SB or a SB bootlicker! Like IB? You work for the IBO! Proud of your kid’s school for something? You are an employee!! Defend a teacher? Ah! You probably work for Gatehouse!
It’s freaking hilarious at this point.
You have a point but, c'mon, read the OP. It's weirdly over-the-top. A more honest assessment would be "Kilmer doesn't suck any longer, and they encourage kids to be nice to one another."
Anonymous wrote:But that is exactly what the program is encouraging. There is no major transaction. It's just recognizing good from students of actions already completed voluntarily. The transaction is the recognition. Have you never heard of positive encouragement to get more of what you'd like to see from children? Maybe if you remove the program you can have kids doing nasty things to each other and spending more time talking about those interactions. Sounds like a DCUM dream school.
Anonymous wrote:The problem is that they are making kindness a transaction. The kid gets a free snack for performing kindness.
Anonymous wrote:OP here. My experience was that Kilmer was the best of all the schools my kids attended, public and private. The staff was the most attentive to my children. I'm sorry you had a bad experience but it sounds like it was several years ago. I didn't and had several children go through the school. I really like the staff and principal and wanted to spread some good news for FCPS and for them. I didn't think the program was in other schools and thought my post might help to get the word out that its a program that admin, teachers, students and parents all seem to like. Article came out this week. No other agenda.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Welcome to DCUM, principal of Kilmer Middle School.
No reason to think it has to be a school employee.
Anyway, positive goings on at local schools is welcome news.
According to this forum, anytime anyone has anything positive or even non-negative to say, it’s due to a representative, etc pretending to be a real person. Disagree with SB bashing? You are in the SB or a SB bootlicker! Like IB? You work for the IBO! Proud of your kid’s school for something? You are an employee!! Defend a teacher? Ah! You probably work for Gatehouse!
It’s freaking hilarious at this point.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Welcome to DCUM, principal of Kilmer Middle School.
No reason to think it has to be a school employee.
Anyway, positive goings on at local schools is welcome news.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No one likes Kilmer. lol.
I’ve had two kids go through it and we don’t have complaints. My youngest is in 8th now. It’s middle school and only 2 years.
Personally, I don’t like how they put the kid’s names for the positive referrals in the weekly newsletter but that’s my personal opinion. There are so many kids there and we don’t need to the small write up about Jack and Jane every week or whoever.
Anonymous wrote:No one likes Kilmer. lol.
Anonymous wrote:The problem is that they are making kindness a transaction. The kid gets a free snack for performing kindness.
Anonymous wrote:The problem is that they are making kindness a transaction. The kid gets a free snack for performing kindness.