Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why would it be included? No, $75 is not crazy high.
I'm sorry - this is something I don't say in my public life. But people are such cheapskates when it comes to their animals. Yes, there should be systems to make things more affordable - we should have a PA level of vet care, like we have with humans; we should have vet nurses who can do more; etc. But come on - these are the furry creates who make every day of our lives better. Stop being a miser about them!
+1 It's crazy to me that people complain about a $75 once a year medical test for a pet when they happily spend twice that on their hairstyle every couple months.
I have long hair on purpose so I can cut my own hair. Vet bills that cost over $100 is too much.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why would it be included? No, $75 is not crazy high.
I'm sorry - this is something I don't say in my public life. But people are such cheapskates when it comes to their animals. Yes, there should be systems to make things more affordable - we should have a PA level of vet care, like we have with humans; we should have vet nurses who can do more; etc. But come on - these are the furry creates who make every day of our lives better. Stop being a miser about them!
+1 It's crazy to me that people complain about a $75 once a year medical test for a pet when they happily spend twice that on their hairstyle every couple months.
Anonymous wrote:Why would it be included? No, $75 is not crazy high.
I'm sorry - this is something I don't say in my public life. But people are such cheapskates when it comes to their animals. Yes, there should be systems to make things more affordable - we should have a PA level of vet care, like we have with humans; we should have vet nurses who can do more; etc. But come on - these are the furry creates who make every day of our lives better. Stop being a miser about them!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Reasonable
Price wise maybe but the test itself was not routine or nessasary.