Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Unless a recruited athlete I did not get the impression Wes is a good school for “sporty” types.
Yes, a recruited athlete. Why not a good place for sporty types?
Wes has a strong contingent of progressives / blue-haired weirdos who despise sporty types.
Not my Wes progressive weirdo, who is dating an athlete….
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Unless a recruited athlete I did not get the impression Wes is a good school for “sporty” types.
Yes, a recruited athlete. Why not a good place for sporty types?
Wes has a strong contingent of progressives / blue-haired weirdos who despise sporty types.
Anonymous wrote:We toured last summer and it was a bizarre mix of extremely artsy and extremely frat bro. I think what this article describes is probably still accurate?
Anonymous wrote:We toured last summer and it was a bizarre mix of extremely artsy and extremely frat bro. I think what this article describes is probably still accurate?
Anonymous wrote:In the 90s it was very arty and progressive. That identity is still there to some extent, but there have been massive changes recently. This article is very informative: https://slate.com/culture/2017/12/wesleyan-university-football-is-good-business.html
Anonymous wrote:The atmosphere at Wesleyan will be less sporty than those of, say, Williams, Hamilton and Bowdoin. The question may be, then, what level of sportiness does your daughter seek?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Unless a recruited athlete I did not get the impression Wes is a good school for “sporty” types.
Yes, a recruited athlete. Why not a good place for sporty types?
Wes has a strong contingent of progressives / blue-haired weirdos who despise sporty types.