Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He was due for removal anyways and he is back at his home country. What's the problem? His own govt can handle it.
Was he indeed due for removal? Can you explain or provide a cite (or pt me to the article) . If so, I don’t have a problem. I tried to explain to my husband that most people who came and started working and settled unofficially knew this day was coming . I don’t know about this particular case
My super liberal friends hate it when I say things like that. But it’s true
He was not due for a removal. He was here legally and married to a US citizen and hadn't been charged or convicted of any crimes. His only issue was his ethnicity.
DP. Good lord. Can we at least wait for facts to come out?
The non-white population of the US is approximately 194 MILLION. MAGA is not targeting 194 million people for removal, full stop.
It is intellectually lazy to claim that people are being arrested and deported solely based on their ethnicity.
Anonymous wrote:I had to move out of Maryland because I did not feel safe and my car was stolen twice.
I was followed by a group of men to the metro. Criminals do exist
I hope the innocents who get caught up in this get released soon
But Until you have lived what is going on …
—not everyone is good
Anonymous wrote:I had to move out of Maryland because I did not feel safe and my car was stolen twice.
I was followed by a group of men to the metro. Criminals do exist
I hope the innocents who get caught up in this get released soon
But Until you have lived what is going on …
—not everyone is good
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He was due for removal anyways and he is back at his home country. What's the problem? His own govt can handle it.
Stop lying. Read the article. He was here legally under Temporary Protected Status.
PS. “Anyways” is not a word.
TPS was the scam claiming that coming from safest county in South America? Please .
DP. He might well have been here under TPS since there was a TPS program for El Salvador years ago.
That’s the problem with TPS. In practice, up until now, it has not been temporary, even when country conditions have improved to where it is safe for people to return there. That is the problem.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He was due for removal anyways and he is back at his home country. What's the problem? His own govt can handle it.
Stop lying. Read the article. He was here legally under Temporary Protected Status.
PS. “Anyways” is not a word.
TPS was the scam claiming that coming from safest county in South America? Please .
DP. He might well have been here under TPS since there was a TPS program for El Salvador years ago.
That’s the problem with TPS. In practice, up until now, it has not been temporary, even when country conditions have improved to where it is safe for people to return there. That is the problem.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I see now it seems he had a final order of removal . I really don’t understand the knee jerk reactions
take for instance Like the people who do the co ops to pay for bond. Regular def ended in the us being held in custody. Charities pay for bond for anyone regardless of the crime alleged. They do it on a rotating and lottery
. .
that is so ignorant. Actual victims of crimes exist. These co-op bond release people place their “high values” over the safety of others in the community. I am pretty sure these people took over and took reigns of the non-Potus- party. I just can’t get behind this “forced fantasy of goodness” of the world!
These folks have orders in place
The "final order for removal" was bogus. the man was here legally, is married to a US citizen and hadn't done anything wrong.
You don’t know this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He was due for removal anyways and he is back at his home country. What's the problem? His own govt can handle it.
Was he indeed due for removal? Can you explain or provide a cite (or pt me to the article) . If so, I don’t have a problem. I tried to explain to my husband that most people who came and started working and settled unofficially knew this day was coming . I don’t know about this particular case
My super liberal friends hate it when I say things like that. But it’s true
He was not due for a removal. He was here legally and married to a US citizen and hadn't been charged or convicted of any crimes. His only issue was his ethnicity.
No. We don’t know. I’ll wait for the facts to come out . The statement reads “the removal was carried out in good faith based on the existence of a final order of removal and Abrego-Garcia’s purported membership in MS-13,” “
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I see now it seems he had a final order of removal . I really don’t understand the knee jerk reactions
take for instance Like the people who do the co ops to pay for bond. Regular def ended in the us being held in custody. Charities pay for bond for anyone regardless of the crime alleged. They do it on a rotating and lottery
. .
that is so ignorant. Actual victims of crimes exist. These co-op bond release people place their “high values” over the safety of others in the community. I am pretty sure these people took over and took reigns of the non-Potus- party. I just can’t get behind this “forced fantasy of goodness” of the world!
These folks have orders in place
The "final order for removal" was bogus. the man was here legally, is married to a US citizen and hadn't done anything wrong.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He was due for removal anyways and he is back at his home country. What's the problem? His own govt can handle it.
Stop lying. Read the article. He was here legally under Temporary Protected Status.
PS. “Anyways” is not a word.
TPS was the scam claiming that coming from safest county in South America? Please .
Anonymous wrote:I see now it seems he had a final order of removal . I really don’t understand the knee jerk reactions
take for instance Like the people who do the co ops to pay for bond. Regular def ended in the us being held in custody. Charities pay for bond for anyone regardless of the crime alleged. They do it on a rotating and lottery
. .
that is so ignorant. Actual victims of crimes exist. These co-op bond release people place their “high values” over the safety of others in the community. I am pretty sure these people took over and took reigns of the non-Potus- party. I just can’t get behind this “forced fantasy of goodness” of the world!
These folks have orders in place
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He was due for removal anyways and he is back at his home country. What's the problem? His own govt can handle it.
Was he indeed due for removal? Can you explain or provide a cite (or pt me to the article) . If so, I don’t have a problem. I tried to explain to my husband that most people who came and started working and settled unofficially knew this day was coming . I don’t know about this particular case
My super liberal friends hate it when I say things like that. But it’s true
He was not due for a removal. He was here legally and married to a US citizen and hadn't been charged or convicted of any crimes. His only issue was his ethnicity.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He was due for removal anyways and he is back at his home country. What's the problem? His own govt can handle it.
Stop lying. Read the article. He was here legally under Temporary Protected Status.
PS. “Anyways” is not a word.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He was due for removal anyways and he is back at his home country. What's the problem? His own govt can handle it.
Stop lying. Read the article. He was here legally under Temporary Protected Status.
PS. “Anyways” is not a word.