Anonymous wrote:Six year old Honda Pilot. I am wondering if I should fix minor dings from new driver?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No. I was the victim of a hit and run 10 years ago and have a visible mark all down the left side, both doors. We treated it for rust, that's all. I am not spending more than I have to on a car. It needs to be functional, that's all.
Insurance fraud
PP you replied to. Why????
Not the PP you're responding to But presumably the PP got money to repair the damage, then just took the money and didn't repair the car.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No. I was the victim of a hit and run 10 years ago and have a visible mark all down the left side, both doors. We treated it for rust, that's all. I am not spending more than I have to on a car. It needs to be functional, that's all.
Insurance fraud
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No. I was the victim of a hit and run 10 years ago and have a visible mark all down the left side, both doors. We treated it for rust, that's all. I am not spending more than I have to on a car. It needs to be functional, that's all.
Insurance fraud
PP you replied to. Why????
Not the PP you're responding to But presumably the PP got money to repair the damage, then just took the money and didn't repair the car.
Is that fraud? The insurance paid the cost to the car back to its condition before the accident. If the owner chose to keep it in its busted post-accident condition and keep the money, that seems like it’s up to them. They’re entitled to the value of the repair, are they actually required to get the repair done?
They’re not required to repair the car, but this strategy makes zero sense if the damage is from your own new driver. You’ll lose money filing claims because your insurance premiums will go up.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No. I was the victim of a hit and run 10 years ago and have a visible mark all down the left side, both doors. We treated it for rust, that's all. I am not spending more than I have to on a car. It needs to be functional, that's all.
Insurance fraud
PP you replied to. Why????
Not the PP you're responding to But presumably the PP got money to repair the damage, then just took the money and didn't repair the car.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No. I was the victim of a hit and run 10 years ago and have a visible mark all down the left side, both doors. We treated it for rust, that's all. I am not spending more than I have to on a car. It needs to be functional, that's all.
Insurance fraud
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No. I was the victim of a hit and run 10 years ago and have a visible mark all down the left side, both doors. We treated it for rust, that's all. I am not spending more than I have to on a car. It needs to be functional, that's all.
Insurance fraud
PP you replied to. Why????
Not the PP you're responding to But presumably the PP got money to repair the damage, then just took the money and didn't repair the car.
Is that fraud? The insurance paid the cost to the car back to its condition before the accident. If the owner chose to keep it in its busted post-accident condition and keep the money, that seems like it’s up to them. They’re entitled to the value of the repair, are they actually required to get the repair done?