Anonymous wrote:Why does he want his kids and grandchildren to live in dictatorship? It’s really mind boggling that he wants to take away their livelihood, their heath, their security, and their freedom. They’ll all be looking over their shoulders. That’s how life is in China and Russia. If he gets on someone’s bad side, he’ll be sent to the gulag. Happens all the time.
He must be sick in the head. It literally makes no sense.
Anonymous wrote:It is clear that Trump/Johnson do not think the SCT is going to agree with them on all these illegal orders (and there isn't even a gray area on most).
Just appeal and live the results. But they are worried because it is so egregious so go ahead and just eliminate federal courts.
Anonymous wrote:Only Scotus is constitutional. Congress can add, delete or modify each district court
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Mike J is an unremarkable man.
He looks like a little leprechaun. I am surprised they picked him to lead.
Anonymous wrote:Wait, didn't liberals want to expand the Supreme Court because they did not like the current makeup and rulings?
Anonymous wrote:Wait, didn't liberals want to expand the Supreme Court because they did not like the current makeup and rulings?
Anonymous wrote:Mike J is an unremarkable man.
Anonymous wrote:It’s like kindergarten. If you can’t win fairly you change the rules.
Or maybe you could not do illegal things.
Tough choices.
Anonymous wrote:MAGA is so undemocratic I just can’t anymore…
Facing pressure from his right flank to take on judges who have ruled against President Donald Trump, Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., on Tuesday floated the possibility of Congress eliminating some federal courts.
“We do have the authority over the federal courts, as you know. We can eliminate an entire district court. We have power of funding over the courts and all these other things,” Johnson told reporters on Tuesday. “But desperate times call for desperate measures, and Congress is going to act.”
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/speaker-mike-johnson-floats-eliminating-federal-courts-rcna197986
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maybe Roberts would like to chine in to defend his part of the government?
EXCUSE me, but why do you think the Chief Justice should “chine (sic) in”? Yes he is the “head” of the Judicial Branch as a whole but that is just ceremonial. He can’t “chine (sic) in” on matters that might come before SCOTUS.
Plus, don’t you realize he would AGREE that troublesome courts need to be eliminated? Not to mention other Judicial organizations that cause problems. The Federal Public Defenders constantly undercut the rest of the Judiciary with their demands for more more more. Wouldn’t it make sense for the most wasteful, like the ones who drag out death penalty cases, to get eliminated or go through some things? I’m sure the Chief Justice thinks so, but he’s supposed to “chine in”?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wait, didn't liberals want to expand the Supreme Court because they did not like the current makeup and rulings?
Hey, stay on script. Anything Democrats do is inherently pro-democracy, you see. Only Republicans are capable of being dishonest, partisan, hypocritical hacks.