Anonymous wrote:Tens of thousands of babies are alive who would not be without these bills.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Tens of thousands of babies are alive who would not be without these bills.
We can have nuance on abortion and fetal development as a continuum, as without it we'd be banning IVF and keeping fertilized embryos alive indefinitely just because, which is ridiculous.
We don't have laws that force women to donate organs even when it would save their dying child, and so, we also should not have laws that force women to donate their body to sustain another life for 9 months.
And we certainly should NOT have laws that cause doctors to have to pause and consider lawyer input before proceeding to save a life which is how it is in TX and some other states right now. Curious how their exceptions will apply to situations such as a woman who is medically stable, but is diagnosed with cancer. Do we force her to wait for the cancer to spread before we allow abortion? Can't do chemo in the 1st trimester. I'm sure the PP believes the only answer is for a woman to sacrifice her own life as a dutiful sacrificial lamb though.
Anonymous wrote:My cousin and her husband live in TX because they both work at NASA.
She has a high-risk pregnancy, so after her first trimester, she chose to come back to MD to live with her parents just in case something goes wrong. Her husband flies out every week.
What's interesting is that in 2020 they both were Republicans and were Republicans for many years. Now my cousin identifies as independent. I'm not sure what her husband identifies as, but I know in the last election he voted for Harris.
The abortion ban is flipping more GOP members than they realize, IMO.
Anonymous wrote:My cousin and her husband live in TX because they both work at NASA.
She has a high-risk pregnancy, so after her first trimester, she chose to come back to MD to live with her parents just in case something goes wrong. Her husband flies out every week.
What's interesting is that in 2020 they both were Republicans and were Republicans for many years. Now my cousin identifies as independent. I'm not sure what her husband identifies as, but I know in the last election he voted for Harris.
The abortion ban is flipping more GOP members than they realize, IMO.
Iowa has the fewest OBGYNs per capita of any state. Only a quarter of [med students] - just over 40 students out of 163 - will train in Iowa.
Last year [2023], the number of OB-GYN resident applicants in Texas dropped 16%.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Tens of thousands of babies are alive who would not be without these bills.
And a significant number of those babies are unwanted and will grow up to be criminals or at l ast severely damaged.
And lots of women are dead. Oh, I forgot, women don't matter. Only fetuses.
Anonymous wrote:Tens of thousands of babies are alive who would not be without these bills.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Tens of thousands of babies are alive who would not be without these bills.
Jfc you are dumb
DP. Like it or not, for some people, this means something.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Tens of thousands of babies are alive who would not be without these bills.
You want them to be alive so they can be slaves or starve to death.
Or get shot in their classroom, or die from eating contaminated meat, or sent to invade Greenland, or turned into breeding stock at the age of 12. The GOP stops caring once they’re born.
Look at child mortality rates through ancient times through the early 1900s. And child labor, and wars, and violence throughout human history. Obviously mindless gun deaths are tragic and should be prevented but in objective terms, this isn’t any worse of a time to be born than in any other time in human history. I don’t agree with the logic that we should be mass killing fetuses to prevent suffering they may or may not experience later in their lives. If suffering is sooooo bad then let’s just nuke the whole planet and be done with it.
Anonymous wrote:Infant mortality rates have increased in Texas.
Maternal deaths have increased.
Teen birth rates have increased.
All of that bodes so well for the state. /s
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Tens of thousands of babies are alive who would not be without these bills.
You want them to be alive so they can be slaves or starve to death.
Or get shot in their classroom, or die from eating contaminated meat, or sent to invade Greenland, or turned into breeding stock at the age of 12. The GOP stops caring once they’re born.
Look at child mortality rates through ancient times through the early 1900s. And child labor, and wars, and violence throughout human history. Obviously mindless gun deaths are tragic and should be prevented but in objective terms, this isn’t any worse of a time to be born than in any other time in human history. I don’t agree with the logic that we should be mass killing fetuses to prevent suffering they may or may not experience later in their lives. If suffering is sooooo bad then let’s just nuke the whole planet and be done with it.