Anonymous wrote:It got horrible reviews.

No, actually it didn’t. It got a few mediocre to bad reviews and the rest were actually pretty good. Quotes from the same bad review keep getting circulated in Maga circles.

It got horrible reviews.

It was literally the number one grossing movie in the world last week making 43 million while the next closest movie made 4 million. One thing Maga is really good at is gaslighting.

Anonymous wrote:MAGA won't watch as brown Snow White

Progressives won't watch a midget parade and the Zionist cardboard-cutout actress as Queen

Who is left?

I'm seeing it later this week because my daughter wants to? I disagree with Gal Gadot's politics and her acting is awful, but it won't be the worst movie I've seen with a kid.

Anonymous wrote:MAGA won't watch as brown Snow White

Progressives won't watch a midget parade and the Zionist cardboard-cutout actress as Queen

Who is left?

This made me lol

MAGA won't watch as brown Snow White

Progressives won't watch a midget parade and the Zionist cardboard-cutout actress as Queen

Who is left?

How could anyone watch thie trailer and then want to see the movie?

It's worse than the first live-action Sonic attempt.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iV46TJKL8cU

The best live-action Snow White was 1997's Snow White: Tale of Terror." Amazing cast of Sigourney Weaver, Sam Neill, Gil Bellows and Monica Keena.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The reviews say it’s dreadful.

Have you actually read the reviews or is that what you’re just hearing on Twitter/Fox News? Because the reviews I’ve read are not dreadful at all. I think it’s hilarious how Maga is refusing to go see this movie because of one actresses view, but they give liberals a hard time for wanting to boycott Kennedy Center. Irony at best on both sides.

I’ve read the reviews. The Guardian described it as ‘toe-curlingly terrible’

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I saw it today. I don’t think it’s as bad as the reviews and all the online negativity suggest it is. It’s just mediocre. The best parts of it is what’s a direct recreation of thr original Disney animation. rachel zegler has an amazing voice and has that sweet ingenue demeanour that makes you believe why the woodland creatures would love her.

I didn’t like the addition of the bandits, that was unnecessary, or the CGI of the Dwarfs. [b]F*** Peter Dinklage for browbeating them into not hiring real little people for those roles.[/b] Everyone lost with decision especially the quality of the final product. [/quote]

Why would he do this? Doesn't he want people with dwarfism to get more roles?

[/quote]

He thought it was insulting or something like that. I think it was cruel of him to go after Disney on that point, and cruel of Disney to listen to him. It’s not like there are many roles suitable for such people available. To think that seven people could have had the experience of a lifetime acting in a major film and the studio used CGI instead, it’s just mind-boggling sad. [/quote]

+1. He was enormously privileged to have a role written with him in mind (Tyrion, GOT) and decided to get on his high horse and complain about there not being enough normal roles avaiable to dwarves. First casualty was the use of dwarves as Oompa Loompas in Willy Wonka. Why use dwarves when you can use CGI to shrink and clone normal sized actors to fill these roles?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I saw it today. I don’t think it’s as bad as the reviews and all the online negativity suggest it is. It’s just mediocre. The best parts of it is what’s a direct recreation of thr original Disney animation. rachel zegler has an amazing voice and has that sweet ingenue demeanour that makes you believe why the woodland creatures would love her.

I didn’t like the addition of the bandits, that was unnecessary, or the CGI of the Dwarfs. F*** Peter Dinklage for browbeating them into not hiring real little people for those roles. Everyone lost with decision especially the quality of the final product.

Why would he do this? Doesn't he want people with dwarfism to get more roles?

He thought it was insulting or something like that. I think it was cruel of him to go after Disney on that point, and cruel of Disney to listen to him. It’s not like there are many roles suitable for such people available. To think that seven people could have had the experience of a lifetime acting in a major film and the studio used CGI instead, it’s just mind-boggling sad.

Anonymous wrote:Why are her eyes so far apart?

What's wrong with you? Does it make you feel better to post that?

Why are her eyes so far apart?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The reviews say it’s dreadful.

Have you actually read the reviews or is that what you’re just hearing on Twitter/Fox News? Because the reviews I’ve read are not dreadful at all. I think it’s hilarious how Maga is refusing to go see this movie because of one actresses view, but they give liberals a hard time for wanting to boycott Kennedy Center. Irony at best on both sides.

+1 the only moral boycott is my boycott.

Anonymous wrote:The reviews say it’s dreadful.

Have you actually read the reviews or is that what you’re just hearing on Twitter/Fox News? Because the reviews I’ve read are not dreadful at all. I think it’s hilarious how Maga is refusing to go see this movie because of one actresses view, but they give liberals a hard time for wanting to boycott Kennedy Center. Irony at best on both sides.