Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OH NO NOT APARTMENT DWELLERS.
Apartments = very high population density of lower income people and exponentially more vehicle traffic cars, thus exponentially more opportunities for litter. Plus apartments have dumpsters, which overfill and blow trash; plus trash haulers spill trash when they're tipping the dumpsters.
You outed yourself with this line. Lower income people do not generate any more trash than higher income people. In fact, probably less, because they consume less.
Lower income people litter more.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OH NO NOT APARTMENT DWELLERS.
Apartments = very high population density of lower income people and exponentially more vehicle traffic cars, thus exponentially more opportunities for litter. Plus apartments have dumpsters, which overfill and blow trash; plus trash haulers spill trash when they're tipping the dumpsters.
You outed yourself with this line. Lower income people do not generate any more trash than higher income people. In fact, probably less, because they consume less.
Anonymous wrote:Falls church city controls its own roads, not VDOT. Call city hall and complain. They have so overbuilt that it’s such a mess now - traffic, unsafe pedestrian crossings, ugly buildings everywhere. The least they could do with all that tax revenue is clean up the streets.
Anonymous wrote:Where's that do-it-yourself spirit that small-government, low-tax conservatives want? Make it a weekly get-together with your neighbors to clean up trash along those major thoroughfares.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OH NO NOT APARTMENT DWELLERS.
Apartments = very high population density of lower income people and exponentially more vehicle traffic cars, thus exponentially more opportunities for litter. Plus apartments have dumpsters, which overfill and blow trash; plus trash haulers spill trash when they're tipping the dumpsters.
You outed yourself with this line. Lower income people do not generate any more trash than higher income people. In fact, probably less, because they consume less.
Anonymous wrote: Whose job is it to maintain roadside litter and trash? Was always perfectly clean 10 years ago.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OH NO NOT APARTMENT DWELLERS.
Apartments = very high population density of lower income people and exponentially more vehicle traffic cars, thus exponentially more opportunities for litter. Plus apartments have dumpsters, which overfill and blow trash; plus trash haulers spill trash when they're tipping the dumpsters.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The lack of any detail in your post is impressive.
+1 Let us know which town it is and perhaps we can help you.
Falls Church City.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You are the growth.
No. Our house was not a new build.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OH NO NOT APARTMENT DWELLERS.
Apartments = very high population density of lower income people and exponentially more vehicle traffic cars, thus exponentially more opportunities for litter. Plus apartments have dumpsters, which overfill and blow trash; plus trash haulers spill trash when they're tipping the dumpsters.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Where's that do-it-yourself spirit that small-government, low-tax conservatives want? Make it a weekly get-together with your neighbors to clean up trash along those major thoroughfares.
How is this a partisan issue? And why in the hell would long-time residents have to waste their free time to pick up a mess the town leadership created and profits from? New retailers = more property taxes. New apartments = more property taxes. Use that revenue to pick the s*** up. You can't 2x a town's population and 5x the retail and expect no downsides. Where does all the tax revenue go? It's like congrats bureaucrats...on making the town worse for everyone. Trash and traffic! Yay!