Anonymous wrote:I can’t decide whether I’m mad at Trump for laying off federal employees, or happy he did it because it has turned the public against him. Now Democrats will win in 2026 and 2028 and we can hire everyone back and get the USAID programs back on track. So, fine. But still, was all this turmoil really necessary?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wasn’t Wiles supposed to be a reasonable gatekeeper?
"I don't welcome people who want to work solo or be a star," Wiles, whose boss calls her the Ice Maiden, said by email. "My team and I will not tolerate backbiting, second-guessing inappropriately, or drama. These are counterproductive to the mission."
https://www.axios.com/2025/01/06/axios-interview-susie-wiles-trump
And good at managing Trump?
https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2024/11/08/trumps-chief-of-staff-susie-wiles-00188467
You now have illegal firings, Trump threatening to annex Greenland, sketchy Starlink deals and “First Buddy” Elon tweeting that Hitler didn’t murder millions of people!?!?
https://www.forbes.com/sites/antoniopequenoiv/2025/03/13/musk-retweets-hitler-didnt-murder-millions-message-amid-ongoing-nazi-controversy/
What the heck happened? Is Wiles just MIA? Or, worse yet, does she agree with Trump and DOGE’s tactics? Good grief.
The irony is that all these conservatives are supposedly “originalists,” but they can’t be bothered following the plain language of the law.
Trump, Musk, and Vance are violently remaking America in their own image and all that can occur to your pea brain is to blame the nearest woman.
The abject stupidity, misogyny, and inability to interrogate your own biases that afflict many of the allegedly well educated posters on this forum make me fear more for America than Trump does.
Aren’t you being a bit dramatic and hyperbolic? Where in the quoted response is it mentioned that she’s a woman? Her gender was not discussed in this thread.
Anonymous wrote:I can’t decide whether I’m mad at Trump for laying off federal employees, or happy he did it because it has turned the public against him. Now Democrats will win in 2026 and 2028 and we can hire everyone back and get the USAID programs back on track. So, fine. But still, was all this turmoil really necessary?
Anonymous wrote:I can’t decide whether I’m mad at Trump for laying off federal employees, or happy he did it because it has turned the public against him. Now Democrats will win in 2026 and 2028 and we can hire everyone back and get the USAID programs back on track. So, fine. But still, was all this turmoil really necessary?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Since when is an assistant supposed to guide the Executive branch?
I get how it’s been done, I get how people her in position can have influence. But in the end, she can’t decide things.
I 100% agree with you in lamenting the situation. But what are we expecting?? ‘We think Trump will make bad decisions, do damage, do illegal things. But she will stop him!’
Some people billed her as being a trump whisperer, and possibly able to mitigate his unhinged ideas and behavior. But that hasn’t happened, quite the opposite.
I would think that assume rationality in Trump. This go around, maybe that’s all gone. I’m beginning to think the mental decline/dementia argument may make the most sense. Threatening Greenland, the tariff non-sense, randomly gutting government infrastructure, threaten science capabilities, ‘buying’ a Tesla on the White House lawn. This is all literally insane behavior.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It is now abundantly clear that there are NO adults rendering sound counsel or advice in the White House
This! I was thinking about Susie Wiles today too. She is totally MIA.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wasn’t Wiles supposed to be a reasonable gatekeeper?
"I don't welcome people who want to work solo or be a star," Wiles, whose boss calls her the Ice Maiden, said by email. "My team and I will not tolerate backbiting, second-guessing inappropriately, or drama. These are counterproductive to the mission."
https://www.axios.com/2025/01/06/axios-interview-susie-wiles-trump
And good at managing Trump?
https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2024/11/08/trumps-chief-of-staff-susie-wiles-00188467
You now have illegal firings, Trump threatening to annex Greenland, sketchy Starlink deals and “First Buddy” Elon tweeting that Hitler didn’t murder millions of people!?!?
https://www.forbes.com/sites/antoniopequenoiv/2025/03/13/musk-retweets-hitler-didnt-murder-millions-message-amid-ongoing-nazi-controversy/
What the heck happened? Is Wiles just MIA? Or, worse yet, does she agree with Trump and DOGE’s tactics? Good grief.
The irony is that all these conservatives are supposedly “originalists,” but they can’t be bothered following the plain language of the law.
Trump, Musk, and Vance are violently remaking America in their own image and all that can occur to your pea brain is to blame the nearest woman.
The abject stupidity, misogyny, and inability to interrogate your own biases that afflict many of the allegedly well educated posters on this forum make me fear more for America than Trump does.
Anonymous wrote:Wasn’t Wiles supposed to be a reasonable gatekeeper?
"I don't welcome people who want to work solo or be a star," Wiles, whose boss calls her the Ice Maiden, said by email. "My team and I will not tolerate backbiting, second-guessing inappropriately, or drama. These are counterproductive to the mission."
https://www.axios.com/2025/01/06/axios-interview-susie-wiles-trump
And good at managing Trump?
https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2024/11/08/trumps-chief-of-staff-susie-wiles-00188467
You now have illegal firings, Trump threatening to annex Greenland, sketchy Starlink deals and “First Buddy” Elon tweeting that Hitler didn’t murder millions of people!?!?
https://www.forbes.com/sites/antoniopequenoiv/2025/03/13/musk-retweets-hitler-didnt-murder-millions-message-amid-ongoing-nazi-controversy/
What the heck happened? Is Wiles just MIA? Or, worse yet, does she agree with Trump and DOGE’s tactics? Good grief.
The irony is that all these conservatives are supposedly “originalists,” but they can’t be bothered following the plain language of the law.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Since when is an assistant supposed to guide the Executive branch?
I get how it’s been done, I get how people her in position can have influence. But in the end, she can’t decide things.
I 100% agree with you in lamenting the situation. But what are we expecting?? ‘We think Trump will make bad decisions, do damage, do illegal things. But she will stop him!’
Some people billed her as being a trump whisperer, and possibly able to mitigate his unhinged ideas and behavior. But that hasn’t happened, quite the opposite.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Since when is an assistant supposed to guide the Executive branch?
I get how it’s been done, I get how people her in position can have influence. But in the end, she can’t decide things.
I 100% agree with you in lamenting the situation. But what are we expecting?? ‘We think Trump will make bad decisions, do damage, do illegal things. But she will stop him!’
The chief of staff has always guided the executive branch.
Anonymous wrote:Since when is an assistant supposed to guide the Executive branch?
I get how it’s been done, I get how people her in position can have influence. But in the end, she can’t decide things.
I 100% agree with you in lamenting the situation. But what are we expecting?? ‘We think Trump will make bad decisions, do damage, do illegal things. But she will stop him!’