Anonymous wrote:can someone explain the test for me? what is the highest score you can get? only were they tested with same level questions or the questions vary depending on the questions the student got right during the exam?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kids used to drop scores from fall to winter or fall to spring because our supplementing over the summer was more challenging than school during the year.
Are you sure that’s why? There are many reasons why they could’ve dropped scores in that time, completely unrelated to your summer supplementing. For example, my kids frequently drop from fall to winter (although, not this year) and we do absolutely no supplementing during summer months. No idea why they drop, but they do. Maybe bc they’re oftentimes sick in winter. I have zero concerns since they’re dropping from high 90s anyway and iready is a garbage assessment tool.
Anonymous wrote:My kids used to drop scores from fall to winter or fall to spring because our supplementing over the summer was more challenging than school during the year.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kids used to drop scores from fall to winter or fall to spring because our supplementing over the summer was more challenging than school during the year.
Great point! But they shouldn't really regress though, right?
Anonymous wrote:My kids used to drop scores from fall to winter or fall to spring because our supplementing over the summer was more challenging than school during the year.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would not read too much into iReady scores, as there is a lot of variability based on how a kid happens to feel on a particular day. As it so happens, my kids' highest iReady scores were when they went back to in-person learning at their schools. After a year of in-person learning, their scores actually dropped pretty meaningfully.
Interesting. Do you think it was because when they were home you were assisting more with learning?
Same. Kids whose parents supplemented at home didn't not have the "learning loss" attributed to the pandemic. (I think that's where a lot of the "equity" push came from.). Children who were supported learned to read chapter books in preschool, soared in math during, etc. But there will be gaps in other areas unless there was a concerted effort to follow the FCPS curriculum. Those are not nearly as important as a good head start in reaching and math though
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would not read too much into iReady scores, as there is a lot of variability based on how a kid happens to feel on a particular day. As it so happens, my kids' highest iReady scores were when they went back to in-person learning at their schools. After a year of in-person learning, their scores actually dropped pretty meaningfully.
Interesting. Do you think it was because when they were home you were assisting more with learning?
Anonymous wrote:I would not read too much into iReady scores, as there is a lot of variability based on how a kid happens to feel on a particular day. As it so happens, my kids' highest iReady scores were when they went back to in-person learning at their schools. After a year of in-person learning, their scores actually dropped pretty meaningfully.
Anonymous wrote:is this already posted on ParentVue for you??
Anonymous wrote:I posted above about a 2e kid who sometimes can't be bothered to try on iReady, so scores are all over the place, and I don't assign any value to them for that kid anymore.
I also have a neurotypical and bright kid, and she scores better on a relative percentage basis in the fall than in the winter or spring. I think it's because we supplement over the summer with AoPS and reading (maybe 30 minutes of AoPS plus 30 minutes of reading every weekday). A better curriculum plus one-on-one help from an adult (me) wins out over whatever instruction she gets in the school year.