Anonymous wrote:If the cop car was calibrated as required (I’d want that proof) it only shows HE was doing 70. There’s no solid proof anyone else was, they’re just guessing. If I’m charged with 70, you need to prove I was doing 70, not "around 70". Id fight it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Was this his first time driving that section so he didn’t know the speed changes? 68 is still more than 20% over the speed limit. I’m not sure I’d be too sympathetic to someone going 20% over and arguing over 2 mph.
I believe the penalty brackets are 1-9 over, 10-19 over, and 20 over. So arguing two MPH won’t lower you to a different tier. But you should remind him 5 mph more and it’d be a reckless.
68 is perfectly fine in that section. I go faster there myself.
I’ll have to see if I can google the penalty brackets. Thanks - that was helpful.
Anonymous wrote:There's a chance the officer might not show up in court, so might be worth a shot.
Anonymous wrote:I always go to court. I have a pretty clean record, so I say I’m guilty but I’d appreciate it if I could take a class rather than have points on my license. They always agree, and sometimes they’ll just reduce the charge to a non-moving violation with no points and skip the class. And sometimes
If you appear somewhat normal, can speak coherently and you are polite they will usually be nice to you. Going to court is great people watching, an amazing parade of dysfunctional and weird people. I think judges appreciate it when someone is easy to deal with.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is proof. The police officer said so. If your DH has clean record he can go to court ask for leniency.
Will the ticket go on his record or is it just a fine? If it’s just a fine, might be cheaper just to pay it.
The cop wasn’t using a radar detector. There isn’t any physical evidence.
I assume it will go on his record. Don’t all in-person speeding tickets?