Anonymous wrote:![]()
The costuming is so perfect on this show. These three trigger me so much as you see women like this a lot in the wealthier parts of NOVA and DC. Perfectly toned bodies even in their 50s and 60s, tastefully applied barely there makeup. Smooth skin that belies their age. Expensive perfectly coordinated outfits even to workout!
I want to be them!![]()
Anonymous wrote:Meh. I'd rather look like whatever, wear old boots, drive a Land Rover with a pile of dogs to my generationally owned castle.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Meh. I'd rather look like whatever, wear old boots, drive a Land Rover with a pile of dogs to my generationally owned castle.
Ha, same. Goals…
Anonymous wrote:Meh. I'd rather look like whatever, wear old boots, drive a Land Rover with a pile of dogs to my generationally owned castle.
Anonymous wrote:Aren't these actresses in their 20s-40s? Not their 50s and 60s.
Anonymous wrote:I couldn't believe how gross their interactions (two vs. three), were. That's why I'm shocked anyone would want to be like them. They are bereft of any 'value system', loyalty or authenticity. They seemed pathetic, kind of.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The two on the right look great. The one on the left is the only one that looks basic.
Out with the Birkenstock Crew.
I don’t think you know what basic means. You can look good and basic at the same time. All of them look basic. 2 of them look better than the third. That’s all.
Adding, though, that Carrie Coon is my fave of the three. She’s the best actress for sure.
Anonymous wrote:Meh. I'd rather look like whatever, wear old boots, drive a Land Rover with a pile of dogs to my generationally owned castle.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It is very effective wealth signaling. You have to have the spare time and bandwidth to be hitting the gym 5 times a week. My wife (43) looks like this and, props to her, it's a lot of work. But I definitely appreciate it.
So weird that someone's husband is reading and commenting on the beauty forum. Also, it's not that hard to look good at 43, fyi.
Not as hard as looking good at 60, I grant you. But it's still pretty hard, given how many not hot women I see in their 40s. A lot.
Anonymous wrote:Aren't these actresses in their 20s-40s? Not their 50s and 60s.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It is very effective wealth signaling. You have to have the spare time and bandwidth to be hitting the gym 5 times a week. My wife (43) looks like this and, props to her, it's a lot of work. But I definitely appreciate it.
So weird that someone's husband is reading and commenting on the beauty forum. Also, it's not that hard to look good at 43, fyi.
Not as hard as looking good at 60, I grant you. But it's still pretty hard, given how many not hot women I see in their 40s. A lot.
None of these actors are in their 60s.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It is very effective wealth signaling. You have to have the spare time and bandwidth to be hitting the gym 5 times a week. My wife (43) looks like this and, props to her, it's a lot of work. But I definitely appreciate it.
So weird that someone's husband is reading and commenting on the beauty forum. Also, it's not that hard to look good at 43, fyi.
Not as hard as looking good at 60, I grant you. But it's still pretty hard, given how many not hot women I see in their 40s. A lot.