Anonymous wrote:Question for those w/kids at Banneker:
During my kid's interview, the interviewers mentioned "competition" many times over. And asked my kid if he was competitive enough to meet the school's expectations and to compete w/classmates.
No idea if that was a scare tactic or not, but it was very odd at the time and feels even stranger now.
Would love to hear current parent takes on this!
I’m a current parent. Here’s my take:
Banneker likes to highlight the kids who do well. They rank. Teachers let the class know who had the top score on a test. They highlight great passages from student essays, and identify the authors. There are classroom assignments that feed into broader competitions, like Project Soapbox and Poetry Out Loud. All the freshmen (except pre-IB students) take the national Latin exam, all the sophomores take the AP World exam, all the juniors (except IB students) take the AP Lang exam, and there’s an assembly in the fall where all the names of students who passed those exams are announced. They make a big deal out of kids who qualify for the NHS, kids who qualify for AP scholar awards, etc.
This is all very different from what we might call DCUM culture where it’s considered gauche to mention your grades or scores or rank or other academic achievements. Most private schools don’t rank. Many suburban schools don’t rank. Walls doesn’t rank.
I agree with the other parent that student culture at Banneker is supportive. But because the school itself highlights the best students, even if the other kids are kind and supportive, your kid will learn where they stand. The school is not going to put someone else’s light under a bushel to spare your child’s feelings. I would assume they talk about it in interviews because they want to be sure the kids they enroll will be ok with that.