Anonymous wrote:In those 4 hours, the body wouldn't have started to smell yet. Unfortunately been around a lot of dead bodies.
Regardless, completely unacceptable for this to happen and I can't believe there isn't a plan B for situations like this.
Anonymous wrote:4 hours is nothing. Once the double digits are breached, things start to go south.
Anonymous wrote:My heart goes out to the woman and her family, but honestly, if someone is that large and heavy that multiple flight attendants can’t move her when she literally dies on the flight then they wouldn’t be able to move her either if there was an emergency where all the passengers needed to disembark quickly. This is a major safety issue. People so big and heavy should not be allowed to fly on regular planes. It’s is a hazard to everyone else. If there is enough demand (sadly they probably is) then they can make special planes with wider seats, wider aisles, and perhaps special equipment to help move passengers if need be.
Anonymous wrote:I have wondered how these things play out in the era of "Please bear with us as we have a completely full flight today." My dad was a doctor and I remember him taking care of someone on a plane who had a heart attack. This was the old days and they cleared out a whole row and laid the guy across the seat. I remember seeing a video of a lady giving birth on a plane and they had her laying in the aisle. I wondered if it was because there weren't any spare seats. It seems like a kind of gross public health thing. If someone had norovirus or something, would there be a row they could clear out - or would the guy just basically poop himself and throw out likely covering the people sitting next to him? Honestly seems like there should be some legislation mandating that every plane have an empty row
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It really is no different than sitting next to a sleeping person for 4 hours from the safety perspective. They should have placed the deceased woman as far as they could from other passengers to avoid emotional distress but it's really not a safety issue.
Pretty soon after you die you expel what’s is your bowels. Definitely a safety issue.
Not a guarantee.
Ok then. Another stupid lesson Karen needs to seen for herself.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It really is no different than sitting next to a sleeping person for 4 hours from the safety perspective. They should have placed the deceased woman as far as they could from other passengers to avoid emotional distress but it's really not a safety issue.
Pretty soon after you die you expel what’s is your bowels. Definitely a safety issue.
Not a guarantee.
Anonymous wrote:Couldn’t they have placed the body on the floor of the galley kitchen area?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It really is no different than sitting next to a sleeping person for 4 hours from the safety perspective. They should have placed the deceased woman as far as they could from other passengers to avoid emotional distress but it's really not a safety issue.
Pretty soon after you die you expel what’s is your bowels. Definitely a safety issue.
Anonymous wrote:It really is no different than sitting next to a sleeping person for 4 hours from the safety perspective. They should have placed the deceased woman as far as they could from other passengers to avoid emotional distress but it's really not a safety issue.
Anonymous wrote:First of all, who declared her dead? If she was having a life threatening medical event wouldn't that trigger an emergency landing? Not just "well, she looks dead, let's get to where we're going and then worry about it." Damn.