Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I thought the article and the pilot were not very compelling since it cherry picked two of the eight schools participating in the pilot, rather than getting a wider variety of perspectives and experiences.
I'm also underwhelmed and unimpressed by the lack of rigor and tangible metrics behind the pilot. MCPS does not know what it's doing when it comes to this stuff and no one seems to demand the level of professionalism and seriousness that you would expect from a school system of our size.
Agreed
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It is illegal to confiscate private property. These busy bodies need to mind their beeswax!
My kids are in a school with this program. Teachers provide pouches/containers for phones - no one is confiscating anything.
One of the most interesting things was that the teachers said the people who send kids the most texts during the day? Parents. That made a lot of sense to me - kids see each other during the day. It made me stop and assess my own behavior.
What are parents texting about??: Did Mr.Larlo yell today in class? Did Mrs.Larla take out her own personal phone from her back pocket 10 times during class to check or text her own children?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It is illegal to confiscate private property. These busy bodies need to mind their beeswax!
My kids are in a school with this program. Teachers provide pouches/containers for phones - no one is confiscating anything.
One of the most interesting things was that the teachers said the people who send kids the most texts during the day? Parents. That made a lot of sense to me - kids see each other during the day. It made me stop and assess my own behavior.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I like how it’s done in my kid’s school—cellular service is blocked and I can’t get wifi either. So the kids are paying attention and not walking around staring at phones.
Check in with us after there is a school shooting and MCPS doesn't communicate with anyone. They are notoriously bad during a crisis.
(I'll tell you about the good old days when you could text your kid crying in the closet to tell them the police on tv say there is no more threat and they told their teacher and friends who had no idea)
Anonymous wrote:I like how it’s done in my kid’s school—cellular service is blocked and I can’t get wifi either. So the kids are paying attention and not walking around staring at phones.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As a teacher, I refuse to touch a student's phone as it may cause an actual meltdown I am not equipped to handle. Also, I'm not prepared to deal with the fallout if said phone gets damaged or lost on my watch. No thanks.
What if students themselves place the phone inside a pouch before it is given to the teacher or front office which holds it until parents come in? How could it be damaged?
Have the participating schools actually been able to enforce consequences? are kids at those schools using it in the hallways as they go to the bathroom to use it some more in bathroom?
Anonymous wrote:It is illegal to confiscate private property. These busy bodies need to mind their beeswax!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do substitite teachers enforce no phones? Or are they also using theirs when they sub?
Probably not but this gives them something to do. These days education is a low priority compared to punishing kids and making schools more prison like.
Anonymous wrote:It has been so much better this year at Silver Creek with the ban than last year. They put a lot of effort into enforcement early in the year -- seizing lots of cell phones and making parents pick them up after the first offense. There is a marked difference this year.