Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yay! Let’s go after anyone who ever dared to challenge Trump! Totally not a fascist move.
Who is surprised by this? Our democracy is crumbling…
No. Democracy back in order.
Anonymous wrote:Democrats can suck it up.
Promises made, promises kept.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She really is a dope, who's way in over her head. This may be the only thing that will save us - that most of Trump's appointments don't know what the f they're doing.
Apparently DOJ has brought some kind of civil action about immigration - like what they did against Illinois I guess. But no one's been "charged."
Poor DOJ. There’s a lot of dedicated public servants there who are going to be asked to do things that strain the bounds of credibility and ethics
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Democrats can suck it up.
Promises made, promises kept.
And if Democracy dies in the meantime, at least libs got owned!!!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Democrats can suck it up.
Promises made, promises kept.
And if Democracy dies in the meantime, at least libs got owned!!!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yay! Let’s go after anyone who ever dared to challenge Trump! Totally not a fascist move.
Who is surprised by this? Our democracy is crumbling…
Hahahahaha
How is it crumbling? Being an illegal alien you have broken the law by entering the country. If you are a criminal, that is even worse. Why would a city want to protect people who broke the law? The federal govt has full authority to dictate border security and immigration. A city and state do not have the ability to decline federal laws.
So this is clear cut. A sanctuary city/state violates federal law.
No problem here.
Imagine if cites all over the country could decide to go against federal law for other issues. There would be chaos.
Because it’s not about the immigrants. It’s completely hypocritical to go after NY but not red states who look the other way re: illegal immigrants working on farms or chicken/meat industries. It’s about going after people who criticized Trump.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yay! Let’s go after anyone who ever dared to challenge Trump! Totally not a fascist move.
Who is surprised by this? Our democracy is crumbling…
Hahahahaha
How is it crumbling? Being an illegal alien you have broken the law by entering the country. If you are a criminal, that is even worse. Why would a city want to protect people who broke the law? The federal govt has full authority to dictate border security and immigration. A city and state do not have the ability to decline federal laws.
So this is clear cut. A sanctuary city/state violates federal law.
No problem here.
Imagine if cites all over the country could decide to go against federal law for other issues. There would be chaos.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yay! Let’s go after anyone who ever dared to challenge Trump! Totally not a fascist move.
Who is surprised by this? Our democracy is crumbling…
Hahahahaha
How is it crumbling? Being an illegal alien you have broken the law by entering the country. If you are a criminal, that is even worse. Why would a city want to protect people who broke the law? The federal govt has full authority to dictate border security and immigration. A city and state do not have the ability to decline federal laws.
So this is clear cut. A sanctuary city/state violates federal law.
No problem here.
Imagine if cites all over the country could decide to go against federal law for other issues. There would be chaos.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yay! Let’s go after anyone who ever dared to challenge Trump! Totally not a fascist move.
Who is surprised by this? Our democracy is crumbling…
Anonymous wrote:LOL, they weren't "charged" with anything. At best, this is a civil suit.
She is either an ignorant AG or she us using terminology to make her sound tough because she is a Trump sycophant.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Democrats can suck it up.
Promises made, promises kept.
And if Democracy dies in the meantime, at least libs got owned!!!
You are a fool.
Anonymous wrote:LOL, they weren't "charged" with anything. At best, this is a civil suit.
She is either an ignorant AG or she is using terminology to make her sound tough because she is a Trump sycophant.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Democrats can suck it up.
Promises made, promises kept.
And if Democracy dies in the meantime, at least libs got owned!!!
Anonymous wrote:Democrats can suck it up.
Promises made, promises kept.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yay! Let’s go after anyone who ever dared to challenge Trump! Totally not a fascist move.
Who is surprised by this? Our democracy is crumbling…