Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:do ecnl national and MLSN 1 practice the same amount of time per week? is it 4 times per week? same number of hours?
is it the same off season (winter and summer)?
is it any different for u13?
I heard vda, Arlington and union all 3 times a week at u13
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:do ecnl national and MLSN 1 practice the same amount of time per week? is it 4 times per week? same number of hours?
is it the same off season (winter and summer)?
is it any different for u13?
Anonymous wrote:do ecnl national and MLSN 1 practice the same amount of time per week? is it 4 times per week? same number of hours?
is it the same off season (winter and summer)?
Anonymous wrote:MLSN has always been > ECNL
This isn't surprising, or new.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:SYC 0 VDA 11
I watched the extended highlights on youtube of this game... there were a lot of good goals by VDA.
VDA s ranked #10 in the country for the 2008 age group and SYC MLS Next is ranked #88 in the country.
A lot of the VDA players were bigger in the video and just overmatched the SYC players. And I have to wonder if SYC was trying out some younger players in that match? Not sure.
It would be great if they somehow faced off one more time before that age group graduates and the kids go their separate ways.
Anonymous wrote:There are discussion threads repeatedly asking and checking if Arlington and NVA will move MLS Next. There are several in the areas already, try out to those.
I'm sure MLS Next isn't trying to follow ECNL and approve to many team in a given area and dilute its brand.
Anonymous wrote:Would be impossible to find any evidence of ECNL over MLS Next as a league. There may be some top ECNL teams that are getting results, but MLSN is clearly the better league. If you can play against MLS Academies then you are in the right place.
However, the top players will get sucked up by the academies whether they are ECNL or MLSN. So, if you have a top baller then it doesn't really matter!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:SYC 0 VDA 11
I watched the extended highlights on youtube of this game... there were a lot of good goals by VDA.
VDA s ranked #10 in the country for the 2008 age group and SYC MLS Next is ranked #88 in the country.
A lot of the VDA players were bigger in the video and just overmatched the SYC players. And I have to wonder if SYC was trying out some younger players in that match? Not sure.
It would be great if they somehow faced off one more time before that age group graduates and the kids go their separate ways.
don't forget 2010 syc still sucks, rolled over by Armour