Anonymous
Post 02/13/2025 17:22     Subject: Have You Noticed
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Women are far more courageous, in general. I know that people will come at me, because men have traditionally been the ones to fight in war. But of course there are many reasons for that that have nothing to do with bravery.
In my own life, it is always the women who stand up, even in matters of violence, while the men do nothing.


Oh please. Women like Ruth Bader Ginsburg didn't have the courage to step down when appropriate. They got us into this debacle.

Ghandi, Nelson Mandela, MLK, Thich Quang Duc....

You are really dumb.


It wasn't Ginsburg's courage that got us into this mess, it was her hubris.
Anonymous
Post 02/13/2025 17:21     Subject: Have You Noticed
Anonymous wrote:Women are far more courageous, in general. I know that people will come at me, because men have traditionally been the ones to fight in war. But of course there are many reasons for that that have nothing to do with bravery.
In my own life, it is always the women who stand up, even in matters of violence, while the men do nothing.


I've found this to be very true. I'm a Doc who specializes in geriatric oncology.

Female patients tend to be braver and stronger fighters than male patients. Female patients who are widowed or unmarried also tend to have a village behind them for support whereas windowed or unmarried men are always going through things solo. Female patients also advocate for themselves more and are more prone to seeking a second opinion when something doesn't feel right to them.
Anonymous
Post 02/13/2025 17:20     Subject: Have You Noticed
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Women are far more courageous, in general. I know that people will come at me, because men have traditionally been the ones to fight in war. But of course there are many reasons for that that have nothing to do with bravery.
In my own life, it is always the women who stand up, even in matters of violence, while the men do nothing.


Oh please. Women like Ruth Bader Ginsburg didn't have the courage to step down when appropriate. They got us into this debacle.

Ghandi, Nelson Mandela, MLK, Thich Quang Duc....

You are really dumb.


Like Hillary Clinton, Ginsburg had the "first girl" syndrome.
Anonymous
Post 02/13/2025 17:19     Subject: Have You Noticed
Anonymous wrote:Women are far more courageous, in general. I know that people will come at me, because men have traditionally been the ones to fight in war. But of course there are many reasons for that that have nothing to do with bravery.
In my own life, it is always the women who stand up, even in matters of violence, while the men do nothing.


Notice that most of the people speaking out against gun violence, violence by illegals, sex trafficking, rape as a weapon of war are women.
Anonymous
Post 02/13/2025 16:39     Subject: Have You Noticed
Anonymous wrote:Women are far more courageous, in general. I know that people will come at me, because men have traditionally been the ones to fight in war. But of course there are many reasons for that that have nothing to do with bravery.
In my own life, it is always the women who stand up, even in matters of violence, while the men do nothing.


Oh please. Women like Ruth Bader Ginsburg didn't have the courage to step down when appropriate. They got us into this debacle.

Ghandi, Nelson Mandela, MLK, Thich Quang Duc....

You are really dumb.
Anonymous
Post 02/13/2025 16:30     Subject: Have You Noticed
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The two women to stand up to trump (Clinton and Harris) both lost and that's why he's in the White House in the first place. Clean up your mess ladies!


You are confused about OP’s post.


OP was the flip side of the same ignorant coin. Gender based bigotry is always ignorant.


It is gender pride.

See Danielle Sassoon. 38 years old, and stood up in a way none of those “powerful” Republican senators have done.

Brava,

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/13/nyregion/danielle-sassoon-quit-eric-adams.html?unlocked_article_code=1.wk4.zVmL.UB4ABbHrVcd-

"Then, when Justice Department officials sought to transfer the case to the public integrity section in Washington, which oversees corruption cases, the two men who led that unit also resigned, according to five people with knowledge of the matter."

2:1, men standing up more than women.

Will you go away now?
Anonymous
Post 02/13/2025 16:27     Subject: Have You Noticed
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Women are far more courageous, in general. I know that people will come at me, because men have traditionally been the ones to fight in war. But of course there are many reasons for that that have nothing to do with bravery.
In my own life, it is always the women who stand up, even in matters of violence, while the men do nothing.


We sent men to fight in wars because they're replaceable. It's not because they're stronger; very little in war requires brute strength that in-shape females can't provide. It's not because they're smarter; women actually have a small lead here. It's because, if mom dies, the family falls apart. If dad dies, that's sad, and would create hardships, but he can be replaced fairly easily.

Not trying to be misandrist, and not saying it's right, fair, or good. But... yeah. That's the reasoning.


You have an extremely narrow view of what war is.
Anonymous
Post 02/13/2025 16:26     Subject: Have You Noticed
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The two women to stand up to trump (Clinton and Harris) both lost and that's why he's in the White House in the first place. Clean up your mess ladies!


You are confused about OP’s post.


OP was the flip side of the same ignorant coin. Gender based bigotry is always ignorant.


It is gender pride.

See Danielle Sassoon. 38 years old, and stood up in a way none of those “powerful” Republican senators have done.

Brava,


Because the Republicans support Trump, moron.
Anonymous
Post 02/13/2025 16:12     Subject: Have You Noticed
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The two women to stand up to trump (Clinton and Harris) both lost and that's why he's in the White House in the first place. Clean up your mess ladies!


You are confused about OP’s post.


OP was the flip side of the same ignorant coin. Gender based bigotry is always ignorant.


It is gender pride.

See Danielle Sassoon. 38 years old, and stood up in a way none of those “powerful” Republican senators have done.

Brava,
Anonymous
Post 02/07/2025 22:47     Subject: Have You Noticed
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:That women are more likely to stand up to Trump than men?


Stop this crap. Show me objective evidence. This is part of why Trump won.

I am man who is all over this illegal admin. What about Chris VanHollen, Jamie Raskin? They were some of the first two leaders to start pushing back. Why try to start some BS circular firing squad? We need to come together at this moment and not argue based on BS.


Who were the Republican senators to vote against his wishes (consider what proportion of senators are female).

I am watching the Federal Board members who are suing him. Disproportionately female.

Who was willing to come forward on the record with their complaints against Hegseth ( vs anonymously).

You obviously don’t understand statistics, but it is a clear trend.


That’s funny I don’t see any statistics in your post. Why are you doing this? Men are right there beside you. Why disrespect us like that? How would you feel if someone said the same about women? Grow up. We need to be together for this not against each other.


Dp. I see you out there. I don't think women are fighting back at a higher rate than men.
Anonymous
Post 02/07/2025 22:46     Subject: Have You Noticed
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:That women are more likely to stand up to Trump than men?


Stop this crap. Show me objective evidence. This is part of why Trump won.

I am man who is all over this illegal admin. What about Chris VanHollen, Jamie Raskin? They were some of the first two leaders to start pushing back. Why try to start some BS circular firing squad? We need to come together at this moment and not argue based on BS.


Who were the Republican senators to vote against his wishes (consider what proportion of senators are female).

I am watching the Federal Board members who are suing him. Disproportionately female.

Who was willing to come forward on the record with their complaints against Hegseth ( vs anonymously).

You obviously don’t understand statistics, but it is a clear trend.


That’s funny I don’t see any statistics in your post. Why are you doing this? Men are right there beside you. Why disrespect us like that? How would you feel if someone said the same about women? Grow up. We need to be together for this not against each other.


Bro, you are disrespecting yourself. Instead of whining about how you're not being treated fairly enough, why don't you go re-educate some of your bro brethren and encourage them to do more?
Anonymous
Post 02/07/2025 22:44     Subject: Have You Noticed
Anonymous wrote:That women are more likely to stand up to Trump than men?


We have more to lose, and a disturbing number of these "men" would be happy to see us lose it, so this tracks.
Anonymous
Post 02/07/2025 22:43     Subject: Have You Noticed
Anonymous wrote:Women are far more courageous, in general. I know that people will come at me, because men have traditionally been the ones to fight in war. But of course there are many reasons for that that have nothing to do with bravery.
In my own life, it is always the women who stand up, even in matters of violence, while the men do nothing.


We sent men to fight in wars because they're replaceable. It's not because they're stronger; very little in war requires brute strength that in-shape females can't provide. It's not because they're smarter; women actually have a small lead here. It's because, if mom dies, the family falls apart. If dad dies, that's sad, and would create hardships, but he can be replaced fairly easily.

Not trying to be misandrist, and not saying it's right, fair, or good. But... yeah. That's the reasoning.
Anonymous
Post 02/07/2025 22:29     Subject: Have You Noticed
Anonymous wrote:It appears that OP is not the only person who has noticed a trend.

https://www.charlotteobserver.com/opinion/article284578280.html

https://www.cnn.com/2022/06/29/politics/cassidy-hutchinson-democracy-trump/index.html

https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2021/10/jennifer-rubin-explains-how-women-led-anti-trump-resistance/

(Not saying no men have stood up, but that women have stood up in disproportionate numbers .)


None of those are a statistical comparison and they do not refer to this current situation. Those articles are from years ago. What is the point of this narrative other than bigotry? It’s not scientific and it’s damaging and fuels the MAGA narrative. Why can’t we boost women and profile them without making it about being “better than men”? How ignorant.
Anonymous
Post 02/07/2025 22:25     Subject: Have You Noticed
It appears that OP is not the only person who has noticed a trend.

https://www.charlotteobserver.com/opinion/article284578280.html

https://www.cnn.com/2022/06/29/politics/cassidy-hutchinson-democracy-trump/index.html

https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2021/10/jennifer-rubin-explains-how-women-led-anti-trump-resistance/

(Not saying no men have stood up, but that women have stood up in disproportionate numbers .)