Anonymous wrote:^^^In case you don’t believe me, check out the list of words NSF is using to flag suspicious research:
https://gizmodo.com/the-list-of-trumps-forbidden-words-that-will-get-your-paper-flagged-at-nsf-2000559661
A few highlights: status, women, systemic, diversify, barrier, excluded
Anonymous wrote:So can someone please explain the IMPACT this will have on T-100 colleges and universities in the short-term (2025-2030)?
Assuming a sharp and massive decrease in federal funding per Musk/Project 2025:
- What will change on the ground at these schools in the next year, in the next five years? How exactly will it affect applicants and undergraduate students?
- Which schools (or types of schools) are likely to be the relative “winners,” and who are likely to be the relative “losers”?
(Assume I have no personal experience with either federally-funded research or college/university budgets. Because I don’t. 😂 But I do have kids applying to college in 2026 and 2029 and am having trouble getting my head around the short-term implications for them.
Thanks!
Anonymous wrote:So can someone please explain the IMPACT this will have on T-100 colleges and universities in the short-term (2025-2030)?
Assuming a sharp and massive decrease in federal funding per Musk/Project 2025:
- What will change on the ground at these schools in the next year, in the next five years? How exactly will it affect applicants and undergraduate students?
- Which schools (or types of schools) are likely to be the relative “winners,” and who are likely to be the relative “losers”?
(Assume I have no personal experience with either federally-funded research or college/university budgets. Because I don’t. 😂 But I do have kids applying to college in 2026 and 2029 and am having trouble getting my head around the short-term implications for them.
Thanks!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:To state it simply, all universities and research institutions will be negatively impacted by this anti-science approach.
Nobody benefits from a world view that values dogma over discovery.
I absolutely agree, of course. This is 100% destructive and terrible.
Maybe because we feels so powerless at the moment, we’re trying to figure out if there’s anything we can or should “do” to reframe our DC’s college research process re 2026.
At the moment, DC is looking at a mix of public flagships and mid-sized privates. Should we be looking at the schools’ financials - endowments, dependence on federal funding etc - to try to identify those that may weather the storm better than others? Or is that like rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not sure why you think STEM research will be spared. The issue isn’t social sciences research—it’s research, period. The list of “forbidden words” includes things like “female” and “inclusion,” words that are used in many contexts and types of research.
A lot of you are not seeing the forest for the trees, here. This is about destroying state capacity, and it’s about eliminating any threats to or competition for Elon Musk’s empire. They are using a sledgehammer, not a scalpel.
Kennedy said he wants to “pause” infectious disease research for four years.
With Avian Flu spreading rapidly!
Anonymous wrote:To state it simply, all universities and research institutions will be negatively impacted by this anti-science approach.
Nobody benefits from a world view that values dogma over discovery.