Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In state? Target. OOS and TO with only 8 APs (yes, I know, but instate kids with 10+ great grades and tests scores are being rejected). Not a target. Maybe a little better than a reach though.
WM likes good test scores. And they really, really like demonstrated interest. Did she tour, interview and do the “optional essay” (which is definitely not optional)? If so, it pushes her closer to target.
I think hard target/low reach and I think she has a good chance (70%) of getting in due to demonstrated interest.
Yes she toured, interviewed, did both optional essays, met with the arts faculty, and was nominated for a scholarship.
Anonymous wrote:In state? Target. OOS and TO with only 8 APs (yes, I know, but instate kids with 10+ great grades and tests scores are being rejected). Not a target. Maybe a little better than a reach though.
WM likes good test scores. And they really, really like demonstrated interest. Did she tour, interview and do the “optional essay” (which is definitely not optional)? If so, it pushes her closer to target.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Re scattergrams: Does target mean someone is on the line of average accepted SAT and GPA?
How do scattergrams help if a kid is TO?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would think Target. Test would help, but must be a reason you're excluding. Pricey OOS public
Good but not competitive scores (1350 SAT) due to diagnosed learning disabilities. Intellect and comprehension are high but processing speed is low. Scores don’t match grades so she chose TO. Hopefully submitting AP scores will help a bit.
Come on. How did she get 4s and 5s on the AP tests but a 1350 on the SAT? Slow processing would also apply to the AP tests. Perhaps she didn’t study enough for the SAT. I say this as a parent of 3 ADHD kids.
Anonymous wrote:Re scattergrams: Does target mean someone is on the line of average accepted SAT and GPA?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would think Target. Test would help, but must be a reason you're excluding. Pricey OOS public
Good but not competitive scores (1350 SAT) due to diagnosed learning disabilities. Intellect and comprehension are high but processing speed is low. Scores don’t match grades so she chose TO. Hopefully submitting AP scores will help a bit.
Come on. How did she get 4s and 5s on the AP tests but a 1350 on the SAT? Slow processing would also apply to the AP tests. Perhaps she didn’t study enough for the SAT. I say this as a parent of 3 ADHD kids.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What does your school's Navience data indicate? Better info than crowdsourcing.
Is naviance reliable for this? It lists W&M as a safety for my DC, and I didn’t think it could be a safety for anyone
I wouldn't focus on the labels. Look at the scattergrams from students who applied from your school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What does your school's Navience data indicate? Better info than crowdsourcing.
Is naviance reliable for this? It lists W&M as a safety for my DC, and I didn’t think it could be a safety for anyone
Anonymous wrote:What does your school's Navience data indicate? Better info than crowdsourcing.