Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Veteran status is often given preference, so yes. Like race and disability, they must be qualified first but yes, they will be given preference once that’s established.
When something is given preference, it doesn't automatically equate to DEI.
Someone may be given preference because they graduated college or HS with a high GPA. Or, they may be given preference because they have successfully managed people in another position. Or they may be given preference because they have experience with a particular software or system.
Lots of reason there is preference in hiring. Basing hiring on race, gender, sexual orientation, or other quality that does not equate to experience or merit is DEI.
You people are so uninformed.
You are uninformed. It’s literally called “preference” in HR. You may hate that it’s technically DEI, but it is.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Veteran status is often given preference, so yes. Like race and disability, they must be qualified first but yes, they will be given preference once that’s established.
When something is given preference, it doesn't automatically equate to DEI.
Someone may be given preference because they graduated college or HS with a high GPA. Or, they may be given preference because they have successfully managed people in another position. Or they may be given preference because they have experience with a particular software or system.
Lots of reason there is preference in hiring. Basing hiring on race, gender, sexual orientation, or other quality that does not equate to experience or merit is DEI.
You people are so uninformed.
Anonymous wrote:Military service is not DEI. The US military is incredibly diverse. Less than 50 percent of soldiers are white males. Whatever preference federal hiring may give to former service members, it's not because of their race, gender, orientation etc. It's simply a recognition of their service to the country and to give them a small boost as they transition into the civilian world. I don't think there's anything wrong with that. If people are upset about it, they have every opportunity to serve themselves.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Veteran status is often given preference, so yes. Like race and disability, they must be qualified first but yes, they will be given preference once that’s established.
When something is given preference, it doesn't automatically equate to DEI.
Someone may be given preference because they graduated college or HS with a high GPA. Or, they may be given preference because they have successfully managed people in another position. Or they may be given preference because they have experience with a particular software or system.
Lots of reason there is preference in hiring. Basing hiring on race, gender, sexual orientation, or other quality that does not equate to experience or merit is DEI.
You people are so uninformed.
Anonymous wrote:Military service is not DEI. The US military is incredibly diverse. Less than 50 percent of soldiers are white males. Whatever preference federal hiring may give to former service members, it's not because of their race, gender, orientation etc. It's simply a recognition of their service to the country and to give them a small boost as they transition into the civilian world. I don't think there's anything wrong with that. If people are upset about it, they have every opportunity to serve themselves.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's how JD Vance got into Yale Law School.
I’ve heard that he also used “economic diversity” because he was from WV
Also geographic diversity. Easier to get into Yale from rural WV, they literally lower the qualifications based solely on geography! That is the opposite of merit.
Once again, he graduated from Ohio State summa cum laude.
That probably had something to do with his acceptance to Yale.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's how JD Vance got into Yale Law School.
I’ve heard that he also used “economic diversity” because he was from WV
Also geographic diversity. Easier to get into Yale from rural WV, they literally lower the qualifications based solely on geography! That is the opposite of merit.
Once again, he graduated from Ohio State summa cum laude.
That probably had something to do with his acceptance to Yale.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's how JD Vance got into Yale Law School.
I’ve heard that he also used “economic diversity” because he was from WV
Yes. Rural applications from underrepresented states get preference.
Anonymous wrote:Veteran status is often given preference, so yes. Like race and disability, they must be qualified first but yes, they will be given preference once that’s established.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's how JD Vance got into Yale Law School.
I’ve heard that he also used “economic diversity” because he was from WV
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's how JD Vance got into Yale Law School.
I’ve heard that he also used “economic diversity” because he was from WV
Also geographic diversity. Easier to get into Yale from rural WV, they literally lower the qualifications based solely on geography! That is the opposite of merit.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's how JD Vance got into Yale Law School.
Really? That's what you think?
You don't think that graduating from Ohio State summa cum laude had anything to do with that?