Anonymous wrote:Of course DC can handle it. Until the last few years, everyone went to the office 5 days a week. And, many private companies are not going back to 5 days a week. I know my law firm is staying at a recommended 3 days in office, although most people are back ~4. It will still be well below pre-pandemic levels. DC, metro included, will adjust, just like it adjusted down in the early days of the pandemic. 5 days in an office was the reality for many of us for decades of our working life. It is not impossible for people or for governments to handle this.
Anonymous wrote:My metro train already delayed this week. Can 270 495 66 all handle feds coming in 5 days a week, which honestly hasn’t happened since pre 2010?
I have my doubts. Will they add more metro trains?
Will DOGE take away transit benefits next?
Anonymous wrote:I get lots of agencies offered some telework before but I've lived/worked in DC for going on 30 years and only started being allowed to telework in 2013. I don't think the volume of people coming in is going to be much different from around 2010. Especially because some agencies are still allowing union workers to telework, some agencies have moved out of DC in the time, and a lot of private employers now offer telework when they didn't back then.
Anonymous wrote:Jump in that slug line!! They were created for this reason.
Anonymous wrote:It would be great if DOGE had a study on missed work, cost of commuters missing work due to traffic, having to use sick leave, etc. I know in my office, most all of us will not sign up for situational telework, which now will only be granted at behest of the Govt, ie snow days, other events.
.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No. It’s never handled it. The commute was HELL. It doesn’t matter where you live, if you can’t walk to work, you are signing up for an hour long commute, minimum.
This.
Of course it matters where you live. I commute downtown and use Metro, the bus or my bike and it is never an hour. But I choose to live close in for this reason. The tradeoff is a small place which most of you couldn’t bear to live in.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No. It’s never handled it. The commute was HELL. It doesn’t matter where you live, if you can’t walk to work, you are signing up for an hour long commute, minimum.
This.
Anonymous wrote:I'm pretty old and have a quite different take. The gentrification drove the federal workforce quite far out. People have always lived far out, yes, but not nearly in these numbers. Many feds had great deals in DC and Arlington, where housing is now affordable on federal salaries. I lived in Clarendon, for example, before anything was there. It was cheap. Times are really different and it will be a mess.