Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Man, the PTA gifted committee worked so hard to get ELC everywhere and now apparently MCPS is getting rid of it just a few years later. Does that committee even do anything anymore? You would think they'd be more active in trying to fight this...
Omg F off. Why the F does PTA even need to work on this? Are they employees of MCPS? Why can't the system recognize there are students who need higher level curriculum and provide that level while still tending to students who need more assistance in meeting "standards."?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do we know whether schools that want to keep ELC will be given that option? Has anyone emailed aeiquestions@mcpsmd.org or Kristie_L_Clark@mcpsmd.org to ask?
Who is in charge of these decisions? Is it Kristie Clark and the AEI office? Maybe it is not set in stone yet and if a lot of people complain we can ask them to change things?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Man, the PTA gifted committee worked so hard to get ELC everywhere and now apparently MCPS is getting rid of it just a few years later. Does that committee even do anything anymore? You would think they'd be more active in trying to fight this...
I think it's mainly a Facebook mom social club. They aren't serious about engaging with the community or recruiting help or executing projects.
I have not volunteered (shame on me) but I see them recruiting all the time. They begged folks to get involved in the question of differentiating ELA at the MS and early HS levels and I'm not sure anyone ever did.
They are also the only reason we know the "tiers" of schools in CES and magnet MS evaluations, and the cut-offs for each at least for one year.
The problem with an initiative led by parents, though, is that kids grow up or jobs change and people have less time than they used to, and if a new generation of activists doesn't step in, initiatives die.
The problem is MCPS should be doing this Full time job, not parents who do not work for MCPS!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:On the timeline slide, it says "Students identified for enrichment in the Central Review participate in ELC at their local school OR at a regional CES program."
That's the same graphic from last year, they almost certainly just accidentally forgot to delete that.
+1
They removed all mention of ELC elsewhere for 25-26. This looks like an oversight.
They also mention ELC at the very end, and include a link to the ELC website.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:On the timeline slide, it says "Students identified for enrichment in the Central Review participate in ELC at their local school OR at a regional CES program."
That's the same graphic from last year, they almost certainly just accidentally forgot to delete that.
+1
They removed all mention of ELC elsewhere for 25-26. This looks like an oversight.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:On the timeline slide, it says "Students identified for enrichment in the Central Review participate in ELC at their local school OR at a regional CES program."
That's the same graphic from last year, they almost certainly just accidentally forgot to delete that.
Anonymous wrote:Do we know whether schools that want to keep ELC will be given that option? Has anyone emailed aeiquestions@mcpsmd.org or Kristie_L_Clark@mcpsmd.org to ask?
Anonymous wrote:On the timeline slide, it says "Students identified for enrichment in the Central Review participate in ELC at their local school OR at a regional CES program."
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Man, the PTA gifted committee worked so hard to get ELC everywhere and now apparently MCPS is getting rid of it just a few years later. Does that committee even do anything anymore? You would think they'd be more active in trying to fight this...
I think it's mainly a Facebook mom social club. They aren't serious about engaging with the community or recruiting help or executing projects.
I have not volunteered (shame on me) but I see them recruiting all the time. They begged folks to get involved in the question of differentiating ELA at the MS and early HS levels and I'm not sure anyone ever did.
They are also the only reason we know the "tiers" of schools in CES and magnet MS evaluations, and the cut-offs for each at least for one year.
The problem with an initiative led by parents, though, is that kids grow up or jobs change and people have less time than they used to, and if a new generation of activists doesn't step in, initiatives die.