Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Have your kid self-assess whether they can study on their own, need a group, or need one on one tutoring. Also it is useful if they self-assess whether time is better spent studying the test concepts or the test design.
Both my kids self-studied but did not approach their study priorities the same way. First kid almost exclusively studied the test design and got a 1550+. Other kid needed to dig in to study math concepts and also spent a bit of time learning about the test design and got a 1450+.
The student cannot self-assess whether they would or would not benefit from tutoring. It is only once you've had the tutoring that you know first hand, what it involves and whether you benefit from it or not. The tricks the tutors tell you are not readily available elsewhere. We checked.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If verbal is the concern I’d plan to do at least one test later in junior year or even summer before senior year. If verbal is not the concern just study over the summer and do it early junior year.
Why?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Have your kid self-assess whether they can study on their own, need a group, or need one on one tutoring. Also it is useful if they self-assess whether time is better spent studying the test concepts or the test design.
Both my kids self-studied but did not approach their study priorities the same way. First kid almost exclusively studied the test design and got a 1550+. Other kid needed to dig in to study math concepts and also spent a bit of time learning about the test design and got a 1450+.
The student cannot self-assess whether they would or would not benefit from tutoring. It is only once you've had the tutoring that you know first hand, what it involves and whether you benefit from it or not. The tricks the tutors tell you are not readily available elsewhere. We checked.
Anonymous wrote:If verbal is the concern I’d plan to do at least one test later in junior year or even summer before senior year. If verbal is not the concern just study over the summer and do it early junior year.
Anonymous wrote:Have your kid self-assess whether they can study on their own, need a group, or need one on one tutoring. Also it is useful if they self-assess whether time is better spent studying the test concepts or the test design.
Both my kids self-studied but did not approach their study priorities the same way. First kid almost exclusively studied the test design and got a 1550+. Other kid needed to dig in to study math concepts and also spent a bit of time learning about the test design and got a 1450+.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Practice test on both. It was explained to me:
25% do better on SAT (kids who have a problem with time, kids who have pretty good reasoning and inferential reading skills)
50% do the same
25% do better on ACT (kids who have trouble with non-calculator math, kids who do better on reading bc no inferential skills are required - the answers are there if you have time to get through them; kids with time extensions do VERY WELL on ACT because time is eliminated as a factor).
My first found SAT to be his natural test. He did not study for ACT.
My second did pretty bad on practice teste for SAT and ACT, but coaching thought ACT was much more teachable. Ended up with a 32.
My third did same on both. Decided to move forward with SAT because had the added advantage of prepping for PSAT as a subset of SAT prep. 1500+ and national merit commended.
Find out your test! Even if your kid hates having to sit at a testing center for 5 hours on a Saturday.
This is the hack used by half the kids we know. ACT with extended time.
YMMV, but the switch to digital SAT was a better fit for my extended time student earlier this year. DC liked the online calculator better for math and preferred the shorter test duration.
I believe the ACT is switching to digital but am not sure about timing and if they are also shortening the test duration.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Practice test on both. It was explained to me:
25% do better on SAT (kids who have a problem with time, kids who have pretty good reasoning and inferential reading skills)
50% do the same
25% do better on ACT (kids who have trouble with non-calculator math, kids who do better on reading bc no inferential skills are required - the answers are there if you have time to get through them; kids with time extensions do VERY WELL on ACT because time is eliminated as a factor).
My first found SAT to be his natural test. He did not study for ACT.
My second did pretty bad on practice teste for SAT and ACT, but coaching thought ACT was much more teachable. Ended up with a 32.
My third did same on both. Decided to move forward with SAT because had the added advantage of prepping for PSAT as a subset of SAT prep. 1500+ and national merit commended.
Find out your test! Even if your kid hates having to sit at a testing center for 5 hours on a Saturday.
This is the hack used by half the kids we know. ACT with extended time.