Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:GT isn’t the flagship, UGA is.
Depends on how you define flagship . . . GT is more selective and more sought-after by high stats OOS students than UGA. GT is obviously more specialized (probably not as good for humanities) but is more prestigious overall.
Doesn’t matter. Show us where GT refers to itself as a flagship.
Does any school refer to itself that way? If so, I'd consider that a sign of weakness and a lack of confidence.
But okay
Anonymous wrote:My DC is waiting to hear from Michigan and Georgia Tech -- both of which have much lower acceptance rates for OOS applicants and, to varying degrees, enroll a (small) minority of out of state students.
What's the OOS experience like? Tuition is much higher for OOS and the median OOS student more qualified. Seems like a bad deal to me, especially if you think that part of what you are paying for is a peer group. Am I wrong?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My DC is waiting to hear from Michigan and Georgia Tech -- both of which have much lower acceptance rates for OOS applicants and, to varying degrees, enroll a (small) minority of out of state students.
What's the OOS experience like? Tuition is much higher for OOS and the median OOS student more qualified. Seems like a bad deal to me, especially if you think that part of what you are paying for is a peer group. Am I wrong?
DS enjoys CS at UMD alot. Would have likely attended UVA if accepted, but I think things worked out for the best.
UMD accepts the same percentage in state as OOS...I gather it has a much larger OOS population vs. GA Tech.
Michigan also I thought was nearly 50/50 instate vs. OOS.
I wouldn't worry about alumni networks and GA Tech. They have grads all over the country. I know a current junior that is interning this Summer in Seattle because companies from all over the country recruit the students.
That said, Atlanta is a cool city and has a vibrant tech scene, so great for that too.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:GT isn’t the flagship, UGA is.
Depends on how you define flagship . . . GT is more selective and more sought-after by high stats OOS students than UGA. GT is obviously more specialized (probably not as good for humanities) but is more prestigious overall.
Doesn’t matter. Show us where GT refers to itself as a flagship.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:GT isn’t the flagship, UGA is.
Depends on how you define flagship . . . GT is more selective and more sought-after by high stats OOS students than UGA. GT is obviously more specialized (probably not as good for humanities) but is more prestigious overall.
Anonymous wrote:GT isn’t the flagship, UGA is.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's not a bad deal if you are full-pay because OOS is still less than full-pay private which is now approaching $96k at privates like USC
OK, but aren't the resources available for students at state flagships significantly lower than at top privates?
And how does it matter that the peer group (and eventual alumni network) is so geographically focused?
Do you know NOTHING about U of Michigan?
Michigan's per student endowment ranks 80th in the US. Far below most privates that are equally selective for non-Michigan students.
Schools with large per-student endowments have lots of money to spend -- on financial aid, on student research grants, on clubs, on better cafeteria food, on faculty salaries, on facilities, on everything. These schools also tend to have the most powerful and committed alumni networks.
Last I had heard Harvard was still refusing to reinstate hot breakfast at all of the dining halls, more than 15 years after cutting it nearly everywhere, despite a student and staff petition to do so. Undergrads tend to not be top priority for endowment support.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's not a bad deal if you are full-pay because OOS is still less than full-pay private which is now approaching $96k at privates like USC
OK, but aren't the resources available for students at state flagships significantly lower than at top privates?
And how does it matter that the peer group (and eventual alumni network) is so geographically focused?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My DC is waiting to hear from Michigan and Georgia Tech -- both of which have much lower acceptance rates for OOS applicants and, to varying degrees, enroll a (small) minority of out of state students.
What's the OOS experience like? Tuition is much higher for OOS and the median OOS student more qualified. Seems like a bad deal to me, especially if you think that part of what you are paying for is a peer group. Am I wrong?
DS enjoys CS at UMD alot. Would have likely attended UVA if accepted, but I think things worked out for the best.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t get it either, particularly if you already live in a state with a “public ivy”. I see appeal of UofM Ross or GT for engineering or a kid that wants to explore a different region, but UNC/UVA I could never justify. I’m also admittedly biased as my DC didn’t want to attend their own flagship so hard to comprehend others paying that much oos.
Not sure if upstate NY and Michigan qualify as the same region. The weather is certainly similar.
Either way, it should be clear to all that SUNY Binghamton offers a very different student experience than University of Michigan. Same with the alumni networks.