Anonymous
Post 01/17/2025 20:04     Subject: Supreme Court to hear case on opting out of lessons with LGBTQ+ books
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:This is just the start of the next four years eroding the long-fought rights of LGBT people. What’s next? We’re only allowed to talk about the achievements of straight white men? Oh, wait.

How is this impacting their long-fought rights? What about my rights? This would be a win-win for everyone.


Seriously? You can't figure that out?

Nope, that’s why I’m asking. I have the right to keep my elementary age kid away from this garbage.


But you are ok with teaching your kid that some human beings are garbage because of the way God made them? That kind of drops the value of your opinion on the subject in my eyes.
Anonymous
Post 01/17/2025 20:00     Subject: Supreme Court to hear case on opting out of lessons with LGBTQ+ books
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:This is just the start of the next four years eroding the long-fought rights of LGBT people. What’s next? We’re only allowed to talk about the achievements of straight white men? Oh, wait.

How is this impacting their long-fought rights? What about my rights? This would be a win-win for everyone.


Seriously? You can't figure that out?

Nope, that’s why I’m asking. I have the right to keep my elementary age kid away from this garbage.


What garbage? The fact 2 women marry?
Anonymous
Post 01/17/2025 19:57     Subject: Supreme Court to hear case on opting out of lessons with LGBTQ+ books
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:This is just the start of the next four years eroding the long-fought rights of LGBT people. What’s next? We’re only allowed to talk about the achievements of straight white men? Oh, wait.

How is this impacting their long-fought rights? What about my rights? This would be a win-win for everyone.


Seriously? You can't figure that out?

Nope, that’s why I’m asking. I have the right to keep my elementary age kid away from this garbage.
Anonymous
Post 01/17/2025 19:55     Subject: Supreme Court to hear case on opting out of lessons with LGBTQ+ books
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Allowing opt out seems like a no brainer.


Do they just want to pretend an entire group of people don't exist?


No child in the US today will escape the knowledge that the LGBTQ+ community exists. It doesn’t need to be taught in schools.


It’s not taught.

They literally don’t want a book with 2 moms.
Anonymous
Post 01/17/2025 19:54     Subject: Supreme Court to hear case on opting out of lessons with LGBTQ+ books
Anonymous wrote:Allowing opt out seems like a no brainer.


They would need to opt out of every book with a married couple.
Anonymous
Post 01/17/2025 19:44     Subject: Supreme Court to hear case on opting out of lessons with LGBTQ+ books
Anonymous wrote:OP have you read this lawsuit in its entirety?

I have they will lose .

It is the worst written lawsuit. The lawyers on the side of the religious zealots should lose their license because of how bad they wrote their side.

It is religious garbage. Worse than that they want add religious indoctrination into public schools.





I never say this but I am gojng to use a dcum phrase —-
Oh, you sweet summer child. If only the merits of the legal case, or the quality of the briefs, mattered. What a world that would be.
Anonymous
Post 01/17/2025 19:29     Subject: Supreme Court to hear case on opting out of lessons with LGBTQ+ books
Anonymous wrote:Allowing opt out seems like a no brainer.


Where is the line between kids not being exposed to gay characters in books and kids not being exposed to gay people in schools?
Anonymous
Post 01/17/2025 19:18     Subject: Supreme Court to hear case on opting out of lessons with LGBTQ+ books
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Allowing opt out seems like a no brainer.


Do they just want to pretend an entire group of people don't exist?


No child in the US today will escape the knowledge that the LGBTQ+ community exists. It doesn’t need to be taught in schools.



Do you realize how dumb that sounds? Everyone knows, but we shouldn't have books with "them" in it or acknowledge them in any way in schools? Why not? What are you afraid of?


They’re afraid that by teaching that gay people exist that gay people will have more rights to… live their lives. Or, gasp, their kid might end up gay.
Anonymous
Post 01/17/2025 19:17     Subject: Supreme Court to hear case on opting out of lessons with LGBTQ+ books
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Allowing opt out seems like a no brainer.


Do they just want to pretend an entire group of people don't exist?


No child in the US today will escape the knowledge that the LGBTQ+ community exists. It doesn’t need to be taught in schools.


Why exactly? Is it less important to know about the assassination of Harvey Milk than that of MLK Jr. just because one was fighting for gay rights and the other for the rights of Black Americans?
Anonymous
Post 01/17/2025 19:17     Subject: Supreme Court to hear case on opting out of lessons with LGBTQ+ books
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Allowing opt out seems like a no brainer.


Do they just want to pretend an entire group of people don't exist?


No child in the US today will escape the knowledge that the LGBTQ+ community exists. It doesn’t need to be taught in schools.



Do you realize how dumb that sounds? Everyone knows, but we shouldn't have books with "them" in it or acknowledge them in any way in schools? Why not? What are you afraid of?
Anonymous
Post 01/17/2025 19:13     Subject: Supreme Court to hear case on opting out of lessons with LGBTQ+ books
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Allowing opt out seems like a no brainer.


Do they just want to pretend an entire group of people don't exist?


No child in the US today will escape the knowledge that the LGBTQ+ community exists. It doesn’t need to be taught in schools.
Anonymous
Post 01/17/2025 19:08     Subject: Supreme Court to hear case on opting out of lessons with LGBTQ+ books
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Allowing opt out seems like a no brainer.

Except the kids being opted out are the ones that need to know it’s ok and normal to be gay or be part of a gay family.


Exactly. Kids need mirrors and windows. Pretending gay people don’t exist leads to kids who feel immense shame for who they are and who try to enforce heteronormativity. Teachers aren’t talking about sex. They’re talking about the fact that some families have two moms, and that’s okay!
Anonymous
Post 01/17/2025 19:01     Subject: Supreme Court to hear case on opting out of lessons with LGBTQ+ books
Anonymous wrote:Allowing opt out seems like a no brainer.

Except the kids being opted out are the ones that need to know it’s ok and normal to be gay or be part of a gay family.
Anonymous
Post 01/17/2025 18:59     Subject: Supreme Court to hear case on opting out of lessons with LGBTQ+ books
Sorry. Asking for a link from the person who asked if OP read the lawsuit.
Anonymous
Post 01/17/2025 18:58     Subject: Supreme Court to hear case on opting out of lessons with LGBTQ+ books
Anonymous wrote:OP have you read this lawsuit in its entirety?

I have they will lose .

It is the worst written lawsuit. The lawyers on the side of the religious zealots should lose their license because of how bad they wrote their side.

It is religious garbage. Worse than that they want add religious indoctrination into public schools.



trainer.

Can you post a link?