Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I had an evening wedding, adults only. Way before instagram. I was paying, so didn't want rando kids. We provided babysitting. It wasn't a problem for anyone as far as I know. My sister got mad because "her kids love weddings and they are well behaved". It was really her DH who wanted them there because he can't converse with adults and uses the kids as a crutch. He ended up in the bar watching the ballgame the whole reception anyway.
Nieces and nephews are different. If any of our sisters didn't invite our kids, I likely would not show up and it would start a war in our families. It's such a show of disrespect. We only have one sister each though. I think people expect nieces and nephews to be invited even when no other kids are.
Anonymous wrote:I think not inviting close relatives of any age is a dumb idea. Family is family, not matter the age and a wedding (to me) is an important family event. I can understand not inviting all the kids of your current friends or less close relations, because not all weddings are for kids.
But some people get so blinded by "NO KIDS" they alienate their sister for life over a 12 year old's attendance. It's silly.
Anonymous wrote:I usually don't participate in silly debates about who is invited to weddings, and certainly never get hot under the collar about these things. But I'll just state here that I can't particularly relate to people who exclude kids at their weddings.
We have West European and East Asian families, and no one has even thought about having kid-free weddings. The point is to celebrate as one big family, and kids have always been cherished guests. I've never seen a kid have a tantrum or be otherwise disruptive at any wedding I've been to. My oldest went to plenty of weddings when he was a toddler and preschooler (that was our time for multiple weddings), and he sat in silence for the ceremony, ate his meal, laughed, danced on the dance floor, and then slept like a log. Like all the other kids!
I believe the kid-free wedding concept to be a mostly Anglo one (US, UK, Australia, NZ). The rest of the world tends to be a lot more family-friendly.
Anonymous wrote:I had an evening wedding, adults only. Way before instagram. I was paying, so didn't want rando kids. We provided babysitting. It wasn't a problem for anyone as far as I know. My sister got mad because "her kids love weddings and they are well behaved". It was really her DH who wanted them there because he can't converse with adults and uses the kids as a crutch. He ended up in the bar watching the ballgame the whole reception anyway.
Anonymous wrote:But yeah, I wanted it to be a grown-up affair (e.g., open bar, live band). I didn't understand the kid thing.
At Italian weddings they always have these things plus lots of kids.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think it brings up a lot of complicated feelings. Weddings have always been traditionally family event with two families coming together and a new family starting. But a few years ago, there was a change to make everything perfect, Instagram worthy and aspirational so out with imperfect kids. I also think it goes hand-in-hand with parents, not parenting their kids which is a huge incentive to not have kids at a wedding.
Personally, I would rather have kids at my wedding, then have a perfect wedding, and I would definitely rather be inclusive of kids than lose and alienate family members.
Likewise family members should understand when a couple chooses to only have an adult only ceremony and not break relationships because they can’t bring their kids
The bigger shift is the couple paying for the wedding. If mom is paying, the grand kids and nieces and nephews are part of the deal because wedding have traditionally been family reunions
That is also a very good point. Adding to that, people are spending more than they can afford on a wedding and many times that goes to make things picture perfect even if it’s over budget and it takes precedence over inviting relatives.