Anonymous wrote:I tried offering 2% when I sold and my house sat in a hot neighborhood - pretty sure the local realtors were blacklisting it. Was told by my realtor that I needed to go up to at least 2.5% because 2% simply wasn’t done in the neighborhood. I did and sold within a few weeks, although the buyers agent complained that I wasn’t offering 3%!
Another house in the neighborhood being sold by a discount agent also took much longer than normal to sell and ultimately the buyer was represented by another discount agent. I had been by a top selling agent whom I had interviewed but didn’t hire that she would steer buyers away from discount agents because they and their sellers were “difficult.”
Sample size of 2, but I would be careful out there. I think it’s disgusting, but seems the reality right now, at least certain places.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In NoVA, not MD, but our very aggressive agent is putting down 2.5% buyer agent commission paid by sellers on offers.
Same - 2.5% seems to be the norm for nova for a full-service buyers agent - we had some agents offer to do it for 2% but they made it clear they wouldn't do much except communicate the offer.
Anecdotally we are seeing that a majority of the houses sitting on the market in close-in nova (~$1M) - if otherwise priced decently - are sitting because the seller isn't covering the buyer's agent commission and won't adjust the price to reflect the buyer having to pay the commission out of pocket.
How have you determined this is the reason?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What then is a fair agreement between a buyer and their agent? The new form agreement everyone gets asked to sign wants 3% with the buyer obligated to negotiate this with the seller or pay the difference. Plus another small fee on top. Seems like 2.5%?
I think it really should depend on the amount of work done. Agent takes you to 20 open houses over the course of six months? Or you call agent about a house you saw on Zillow and they write up the offer? Very different amounts of work and should be paid accordingly. But I’m not sure why the seller should pay for it. They’re paying their agent for doing work on their house.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm a buyer and a realtor is asking for 3% commission, negotiated with the seller but it's my job to pay her the difference if the seller doesn't agree.
How are other people handling this? For a $2M home, $30K feels awfully rich for opening a few doors. There's no world where I'm going to pay a realtor 10x more money than I earn per hour.
By saying “no”.
Anonymous wrote:What then is a fair agreement between a buyer and their agent? The new form agreement everyone gets asked to sign wants 3% with the buyer obligated to negotiate this with the seller or pay the difference. Plus another small fee on top. Seems like 2.5%?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm the PP who mentioned some houses are sitting that aren't covering buyer commission at/under $1M list price in close-in nova. I'm not a realtor (lobbyist, so pretty far from a realtor lol) - but am in the market looking to buy a SFH in Arlington right now.
We know the seller not covering the buyer agent commission is why certain houses are sitting because the listing agent is literally telling our agent that directly when our agent calls them to inquire on the property. Not sure if the sellers agent should be doing that (I would assume not??) but they are - I think we've had 5 listing agents so far say the seller will not cover the buyer agent commission and will not take an offer below list that reflects the buyer having to pay the buyer agent %.
But like I said in my original post it's anecdotal and based on my experience - didn't mean to trigger this thread!!
There are fewer than 20 homes in the 1M range in Arlington right now. Half have been on the market for less than two weeks.
I'm not doubting your experience. But I maintain that doesn't make sense. It also still screams a real estate agent trying to scare buyers into offering a commission.
Anonymous wrote:I'm the PP who mentioned some houses are sitting that aren't covering buyer commission at/under $1M list price in close-in nova. I'm not a realtor (lobbyist, so pretty far from a realtor lol) - but am in the market looking to buy a SFH in Arlington right now.
We know the seller not covering the buyer agent commission is why certain houses are sitting because the listing agent is literally telling our agent that directly when our agent calls them to inquire on the property. Not sure if the sellers agent should be doing that (I would assume not??) but they are - I think we've had 5 listing agents so far say the seller will not cover the buyer agent commission and will not take an offer below list that reflects the buyer having to pay the buyer agent %.
But like I said in my original post it's anecdotal and based on my experience - didn't mean to trigger this thread!!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In NoVA, not MD, but our very aggressive agent is putting down 2.5% buyer agent commission paid by sellers on offers.
Same - 2.5% seems to be the norm for nova for a full-service buyers agent - we had some agents offer to do it for 2% but they made it clear they wouldn't do much except communicate the offer.
Anecdotally we are seeing that a majority of the houses sitting on the market in close-in nova (~$1M) - if otherwise priced decently - are sitting because the seller isn't covering the buyer's agent commission and won't adjust the price to reflect the buyer having to pay the commission out of pocket.
Anonymous wrote:I am paying my agent, who has represented me for 30 years, the same 5% I have for decades. I know he will get me a top price in return.
Anonymous wrote:I'm a buyer and a realtor is asking for 3% commission, negotiated with the seller but it's my job to pay her the difference if the seller doesn't agree.
How are other people handling this? For a $2M home, $30K feels awfully rich for opening a few doors. There's no world where I'm going to pay a realtor 10x more money than I earn per hour.