Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A few years ago there was an article in the NYTimes about mandatory uniforms at NY schools in the 70s or 80s.
It was a leveling socially. Everyone's grades picked up, as did attendance. Then for some reason, the mandate was dropped and yes, the grades went down and so did attendance.
I don't have a link to this to hand, but I'm sure you can find it on google / the NYTimes website.
I always laugh when folks think that uniforms are leveling socially. They are not. There are other ways in which class difference will avail themselves. The shoes kids wear, their bookbag, the trips for break, etc.
The uniforms do not level socially they just remove some distraction from students.
Anonymous wrote:A few years ago there was an article in the NYTimes about mandatory uniforms at NY schools in the 70s or 80s.
It was a leveling socially. Everyone's grades picked up, as did attendance. Then for some reason, the mandate was dropped and yes, the grades went down and so did attendance.
I don't have a link to this to hand, but I'm sure you can find it on google / the NYTimes website.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Uniforms in public schools are for poor urban kids. MCPS parents wouldn’t want anything those kids have!
They cost more.
No they don't. They can be cost effective and less would buy fast fashion. Better yet if uniforms could be bought from sensible soured materials on a mass scale.
I have a kid who doesn’t care about brands so it’s more expensive if you have to buy through specific stores. If you don’t like how your kid dresses do something about it.
Here's that poster who thinks on a micro level. Could having uniforms help reduce clothes going into landfill? Just a thought outside the "if you don't like how your kid..." blah blah blah
No, and I donate, give to friends or sell the clothes. It’s not wasted. I would not dress my kid in someone else’s worn out uniforms.
Yet you're fine to give to friends or sell, presuming that is clothes that have already been worn, to friends. Hmmm...
Anonymous wrote:A few years ago there was an article in the NYTimes about mandatory uniforms at NY schools in the 70s or 80s.
It was a leveling socially. Everyone's grades picked up, as did attendance. Then for some reason, the mandate was dropped and yes, the grades went down and so did attendance.
I don't have a link to this to hand, but I'm sure you can find it on google / the NYTimes website.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Uniforms in public schools are for poor urban kids. MCPS parents wouldn’t want anything those kids have!
They cost more.
No they don't. They can be cost effective and less would buy fast fashion. Better yet if uniforms could be bought from sensible soured materials on a mass scale.
I have a kid who doesn’t care about brands so it’s more expensive if you have to buy through specific stores. If you don’t like how your kid dresses do something about it.
Here's that poster who thinks on a micro level. Could having uniforms help reduce clothes going into landfill? Just a thought outside the "if you don't like how your kid..." blah blah blah
No, and I donate, give to friends or sell the clothes. It’s not wasted. I would not dress my kid in someone else’s worn out uniforms.
Anonymous wrote:I went to school in England and wore a uniform. My kid was in mcps thru 2nd and is now in private. They have a uniform. It’s a polo shirt with school emblem and then any khaki or navy pants they like. I get her pants from the thrift store, the shirts are about $20 each. It’s not expensive to me, including the PE uniform it’s about $100 every 2 years.
I’d love to see all kids in uniforms, itll never we happen here though.
Anonymous wrote:I went to school in England and wore a uniform. My kid was in mcps thru 2nd and is now in private. They have a uniform. It’s a polo shirt with school emblem and then any khaki or navy pants they like. I get her pants from the thrift store, the shirts are about $20 each. It’s not expensive to me, including the PE uniform it’s about $100 every 2 years.
I’d love to see all kids in uniforms, itll never we happen here though.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Uniforms in public schools are for poor urban kids. MCPS parents wouldn’t want anything those kids have!
They cost more.
No they don't. They can be cost effective and less would buy fast fashion. Better yet if uniforms could be bought from sensible soured materials on a mass scale.
I have a kid who doesn’t care about brands so it’s more expensive if you have to buy through specific stores. If you don’t like how your kid dresses do something about it.
Here's that poster who thinks on a micro level. Could having uniforms help reduce clothes going into landfill? Just a thought outside the "if you don't like how your kid..." blah blah blah
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Uniforms in public schools are for poor urban kids. MCPS parents wouldn’t want anything those kids have!
They cost more.
No they don't. They can be cost effective and less would buy fast fashion. Better yet if uniforms could be bought from sensible soured materials on a mass scale.
I have a kid who doesn’t care about brands so it’s more expensive if you have to buy through specific stores. If you don’t like how your kid dresses do something about it.
Here's that poster who thinks on a micro level. Could having uniforms help reduce clothes going into landfill? Just a thought outside the "if you don't like how your kid..." blah blah blah
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Uniforms in public schools are for poor urban kids. MCPS parents wouldn’t want anything those kids have!
They cost more.
No they don't. They can be cost effective and less would buy fast fashion. Better yet if uniforms could be bought from sensible soured materials on a mass scale.
I have a kid who doesn’t care about brands so it’s more expensive if you have to buy through specific stores. If you don’t like how your kid dresses do something about it.
Here's that poster who thinks on a micro level. Could having uniforms help reduce clothes going into landfill? Just a thought outside the "if you don't like how your kid..." blah blah blah
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Uniforms in public schools are for poor urban kids. MCPS parents wouldn’t want anything those kids have!
They cost more.
No they don't. They can be cost effective and less would buy fast fashion. Better yet if uniforms could be bought from sensible soured materials on a mass scale.
I have a kid who doesn’t care about brands so it’s more expensive if you have to buy through specific stores. If you don’t like how your kid dresses do something about it.