Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Their parents were here on a visa. No one is expected to stop living when they come here ona visa. An anchor baby is when someone comes here illegally, has a baby and the relies on the baby as a way to not get deported. And you know this…

+1

x1000. OP title and thread is surprisingly stupid considering dcum is supposedly UMC educated posters.

But they’re also liberal and progressive. So the post makes a lot of sense.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:MAGA here. Children of legal immigrants aren't anchor babies. I dont know why this is so complicated- we aren't against immigrants. We are against open borders with no security. This isnt rocket science and you're unable to comprehend this because you're too devoted to the theory that the right is motivated by racism.

How do you feel about wealthy women on tourist visas from developed countries who come to the US to give birth? Are those anchor babies? Are they worthy of citizenship?

There have been many posts on here where people are complaining about that very scenario: pregnant women coming here on a tourist visa and then giving birth to give their children American citizenship. Now, all of a sudden, MAGA are only pointing out the illegal ones who do this.

ITA with OP. MAGA are twisting themselves in a pretzel, again, due to the many hypocrisies of Trumplandia.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:MAGA here. Children of legal immigrants aren't anchor babies. I dont know why this is so complicated- we aren't against immigrants. We are against open borders with no security. This isnt rocket science and you're unable to comprehend this because you're too devoted to the theory that the right is motivated by racism.

Children born in the US are automatically US citizens.

"The Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees that every child born "within the jurisdiction of the United States" is a U.S. citizen, regardless of their parent's immigration or citizenship status.Oct 16, 2024"

Right. It’s PP who is unable to comprehend. They just made up the non-legal v. Legal requirement of the parents. But that sort of lying is not surprising with MAGA.

Anonymous wrote:If MAGAs didn’t have double standards they would have no standards.

This. Lying, bunch of ignorant hypocrites.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Their parents were here on a visa. No one is expected to stop living when they come here ona visa. An anchor baby is when someone comes here illegally, has a baby and the relies on the baby as a way to not get deported. And you know this…

+1

x1000. OP title and thread is surprisingly stupid considering dcum is supposedly UMC educated posters.

MAGAs want to end birthright citizenship so it’s a very fair question that exposes your double standards.

OP is saying Vivek Ramaswamy and Kash Patel are anchor babies You are conflating anchor babies and birthright citizenship. Educate yourself and come back.

Why don’t you educate us? Your Dear Leader and Stephen Miller were against all immigration legal or not, until President Musk started singing another tune. I know it must be hard keeping your stories straight but at least try.

Anonymous wrote:MAGA here. Children of legal immigrants aren't anchor babies. I dont know why this is so complicated- we aren't against immigrants. We are against open borders with no security. This isnt rocket science and you're unable to comprehend this because you're too devoted to the theory that the right is motivated by racism.

Children born in the US are automatically US citizens.

"The Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees that every child born "within the jurisdiction of the United States" is a U.S. citizen, regardless of their parent's immigration or citizenship status.Oct 16, 2024"

Kids born here when parents live here legally would also get visas or green cards anyway if they didn’t get citizenship. That’s what happens in every other country. After a couple years they would then be eligible for citizenship. I’m one of the people who had a baby here while on green card and I would have been fine with getting the kids citizenship later rather than immediately at birth. It just saves the country administrative costs to do it at birth. Kids born here when the parents are not living here legally are a completely different situation. Even worse is when they try to use those kids as an excuse to not be deported themselves.

This whole thread is dumb and certainly not the gotcha that some people think it is.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Their parents were here on a visa. No one is expected to stop living when they come here ona visa. An anchor baby is when someone comes here illegally, has a baby and the relies on the baby as a way to not get deported. And you know this…

+1

x1000. OP title and thread is surprisingly stupid considering dcum is supposedly UMC educated posters.

MAGAs want to end birthright citizenship so it’s a very fair question that exposes your double standards.

OP is saying Vivek Ramaswamy and Kash Patel are anchor babies You are conflating anchor babies and birthright citizenship. Educate yourself and come back.

Anonymous wrote:If MAGAs didn’t have double standards they would have no standards.

So true. Whatever benefits Trump is their standard.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Their parents were here on a visa. No one is expected to stop living when they come here ona visa. An anchor baby is when someone comes here illegally, has a baby and the relies on the baby as a way to not get deported. And you know this…

+1

x1000. OP title and thread is surprisingly stupid considering dcum is supposedly UMC educated posters.

MAGAs want to end birthright citizenship so it’s a very fair question that exposes your double standards.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Their parents were here on a visa. No one is expected to stop living when they come here ona visa. An anchor baby is when someone comes here illegally, has a baby and the relies on the baby as a way to not get deported. And you know this…

+1

x1000. OP title and thread is surprisingly stupid considering dcum is supposedly UMC educated posters.

Anonymous wrote:MAGA here. Children of legal immigrants aren't anchor babies. I dont know why this is so complicated- we aren't against immigrants. We are against open borders with no security. This isnt rocket science and you're unable to comprehend this because you're too devoted to the theory that the right is motivated by racism.

How do you feel about wealthy women on tourist visas from developed countries who come to the US to give birth? Are those anchor babies? Are they worthy of citizenship?

Anonymous wrote:Their parents were here on a visa. No one is expected to stop living when they come here ona visa. An anchor baby is when someone comes here illegally, has a baby and the relies on the baby as a way to not get deported. And you know this…

+1

Anonymous wrote:MAGA here. Children of legal immigrants aren't anchor babies. I dont know why this is so complicated- we aren't against immigrants. We are against open borders with no security. This isnt rocket science and you're unable to comprehend this because you're too devoted to the theory that the right is motivated by racism.

People on visas aren't citizens so those babies are indeed anchor babies according to MAGA.

Anonymous wrote:MAGA here. Children of legal immigrants aren't anchor babies. I dont know why this is so complicated- we aren't against immigrants. We are against open borders with no security. This isnt rocket science and you're unable to comprehend this because you're too devoted to the theory that the right is motivated by racism.

Y’all want to end birthright citizenship. At least keep your stories straight.